FAKE BAD REVEIW

Can't we all just get alone and have hot, sweaty, fun!!

Oh Well.... as they say.... "Here's Your Sign! "

Wasn't aiming that at you, Commander.... I'm just not very surprised by any of this.

Don't worry brother, I didn't take it that way. :-)

I did think Londons Idea was a good one for future refrences and still do. Thanks again for that idea girl! AGAIN BOTTOM line the reveiw is a flake, Why is that so hard for yall to beleive that??? Im not going to sit up here and claim a fake reveiw. You can pick it apart and look it in out and around, it will not change the fact that its FAKE.

One quick way to clear up the suspicion that it is another provider here is to do a simple check of the date the suspected provider joined ECCIE, and compare it with the date of the reviewer. That would at least clear up that idea fairly quick seems to me anyways.

If unworthy detective may postulate briefly. If activities outlined were activities advertised, no surprise should have occurred. If dissatisfied, disappointment part of payment. Would hobbyist contract for what was already known not to be menu of choosing to submit dissatisfactory review? If so, prank expensive. Only motive in asking for dissatisfactory service is vengeance. If man dislike lady enough to waste 200$ on only hobby experience in 8 months, identity would be well known to victim. That much hatred hard to hide.
If this were Charlie Chan movie, now would unmask murderer. Unfortunately may only narrow down. Suspect is:
1. Man who pay 200$ for known deficient menu to write bad review.
2. Honest reviewer who belong to board for 8 months or remain blissfully unaware of all said in same time.
3. Person intending to get even with accused for real or imagined slight and have bogus account set up for own reason. Could be man or could be non-man.
If BabyDallas would now be looking at who join ECCIE at least 8 months ago who now have axe to grind.
Also would have ass that would make linen suit fit strangely.

Another lady WOULD have been much harsher. Like the ad that was put up on BP about me just a couple of hours ago.. NOW THAT WAS ANOTHER LADY!! lol. Funny, I can actually laugh about this BP stuff nowadays.

One quick way to clear up the suspicion that it is another provider here is to do a simple check of the date the suspected provider joined ECCIE, and compare it with the date of the reviewer. That would at least clear up that idea fairly quick seems to me anyways. Originally Posted by ali*cat

Why would you even respond to this thread? That makes NO sense, just like you. Do you recall back last Jan 2010 you told me about your male account? ummm...I really thinks its YOU. You and I both know You send me emails and texts daily talking shit for no reason! Telling clients of mine lies about me, saying I work for Le, and that I have bad company..really? You was the bad comapny and I dropped you because your full OF DRAMA. Its funny how the reveiw says "thick thighs" and back when we worked together at Jonnsons when I used to post your pics for you on BP you told the other girls that my thighs where too thick! With that, and all the texts and emails you send daily it points at YOU, Then its funny how I just sent you an email back for the first time after your 5th email this week, talking really bad about you so I guess you figure this will be payback, Then my bp ad did say * dont get with these ducks, get with this swan...Maybe you thought I was aiming it at YOU??..then not even 5 minutes after that, here goes this magic bad reveiw....Do better than that mama. Not like you would be woman enough to admit it, I dont expect that. I see through you like windex MAMA! You live for this kinda of stuff, that is why everyone who you have dealt with in the past ends up in a fight with you...Wonder why?? Says alot about you!

The mods can determine who wrote the fake review. Whether or not it was another insecure provider trying to slyly sabotage another provider. Still my votes on the provider.

Baby Dallas KEEP YOUR CHIN UP. You don't sugar coat anything, you keep it real.

Not even going there, sweetie.

geez..let it go..first this thread about BP..it for once is actually about eccie..so drop that bullshit or stay in the thread so wonderfully started about..geez really

and second..

just cuz the guy hasn't posted more reviews doesn't mean he isn't active.. he could be seeing girls more than any guy here..

also..since i can't read all the review perhaps some are talking about unseen stuff..

but for all any of the girls know that don't have a WK lap dog reading details to them.. it seems he could have just given a NO based on he just didn't like the service..

it may not have been the menu..it may not have been the price..it may not have even been her looks.. believe it or not.. guys can give a no.. some have balls enough to stand up and do it.. he may have just not liked the overall experience and would not recommend her.. there is no wrong in that..now if its something said i can't read then so be it..

facts are.. this thread has now resorted to a girl saying the review is a fake.. she CAN'T PROVE it is fake..just like he CAN'T prove it isn't.. neither one really has a way to do it..

the review can stand.. my goal if i was being reviewed would be to hussle my ass and see if i can't get more positive ones and let the negative one move to the next pages.. i wouldn't point more attention to the situation.. have my say.. ask for the thread to be locked and move on.. let the guys draw their own conclusions

but.. that wouldn't gain attention from the WK lap dogs.

that wouldn't gain attention from the LWK (lady white knights)..

some i truly believe abide by the "any attention is good attention" and the ever popular "haters make me famous" advertising guidelines..

much more would have been gained by waiting.. then notifying the mods that hey i am fixing to post..can u lock it as soon as i do so i can have my say and move on..

then work to make sure that every review is a good one and that will prove more to the nay sayers then this "he said she said" that is occurring

Like I said compare join dates for "said" provider. It will clear things up asap.

Another lady WOULD have been much harsher. Like the ad that was put up on BP about me just a couple of hours ago.. NOW THAT WAS ANOTHER LADY!! lol. Funny, I can actually laugh about this BP stuff nowadays. Originally Posted by ali*cat

LOL RIGHT ALONG WITH YOU!

OMG.. really.. i witness people ban for less..were warnings not handed out in public about this high schoolish ghetto bullshit..

fine ya'll worked at johnsons.(which for the unknowing speaks volumes)

fine ya'll dislike each other

whatever whatever.. she said this about me 18 yrs ago..she said this about me last week..

geez..get it off the fucking board..NO ONE GIVES A SHIT!!!

i believe now the truth shines thru.. baby d u wanted to accuse her all along.. ali you have been waiting so you could jump..

mission accomplished by both..now you both look even more foolish and its just more reason to avoid you both

geez..let it go..first this thread about BP..it for once is actually about eccie..so drop that bullshit or stay in the thread so wonderfully started about..geez really

and second..

just cuz the guy hasn't posted more reviews doesn't mean he isn't active.. he could be seeing girls more than any guy here..

also..since i can't read all the review perhaps some are talking about unseen stuff..

but for all any of the girls know that don't have a WK lap dog reading details to them.. it seems he could have just given a NO based on he just didn't like the service..

it may not have been the menu..it may not have been the price..it may not have even been her looks.. believe it or not.. guys can give a no.. some have balls enough to stand up and do it.. he may have just not liked the overall experience and would not recommend her.. there is no wrong in that..now if its something said i can't read then so be it..

facts are.. this thread has now resorted to a girl saying the review is a fake.. she CAN'T PROVE it is fake..just like he CAN'T prove it isn't.. neither one really has a way to do it..

the review can stand.. my goal if i was being reviewed would be to hussle my ass and see if i can't get more positive ones and let the negative one move to the next pages.. i wouldn't point more attention to the situation.. have my say.. ask for the thread to be locked and move on.. let the guys draw their own conclusions

but.. that wouldn't gain attention from the WK lap dogs.

that wouldn't gain attention from the LWK (lady white knights)..

some i truly believe abide by the "any attention is good attention" and the ever popular "haters make me famous" advertising guidelines..

much more would have been gained by waiting.. then notifying the mods that hey i am fixing to post..can u lock it as soon as i do so i can have my say and move on..

then work to make sure that every review is a good one and that will prove more to the nay sayers then this "he said she said" that is occurring Originally Posted by DeAnna Luv

WHY DONT YOU USE YOUR FAMOUS LINE & * LET IT GO*

NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT UNSEEN STUFF, I KNOW I WAS NOT IN BRYANT AT AN INCALL. THAT IS WHAT SET IT OFF RIGHT THERE. I LOOK OVER YOUR STUFF ENOUGH, BUT SOMETIMES ITS LIKE DAMN! WOULD YOU TAKE CREDIT FOR A REVEIW A BAD ONE AT THAT, THAT YOU NEVER DID?! YOU WOULD BE CRAZY TO JUST LIKE YOU SAY " LET IT GO" IF YOU DONT LIKE WHAT IS GOING ON STOP RESPONDING TO IT WITH YOUR CHAPTER LONG COMMENTS...THEY TAKE UP TOO MUCH ROOM IN MY THREAD!