If Biden Were Sure of His “Victory”, He’d Welcome Transparency.

YR is the one whining!!!

YR is the one whining!!!


Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Does he do anything else?

YR is the one whining!!!


Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Waaabhhh. Waaaahhhh waaahhhh!

Suck it up buttercup.

Biden are yo President.

Waaabhhh. Waaaahhhh waaahhhh!

Suck it up buttercup.

Biden are yo President. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Insulting and rude remark yssup

It is fact you showed no evidence.
It was also just a matter of time until you used the claim any evidence offered would be denied. You're a joke.
Your position is no evidence is needed. No due process needs to be involved. Only your claims of guilt are required..

In other words, you're a fascist.

Just another trait you project.
You want a do-over "with observers to detect dpst voter fraud".
The fact that there were observers from both parties is well established. Your quote below is well disproven by your posts.

"i welcome cogent and constructive debate from all parties!!"

Tough to have a debate when someone props up a many-time-debunked lie. You claiming no observers, in the face of all findings, hearings, and available sources shows you want no debate.
You waited for trump to blaze the trail for openly lying about virtually anything and you leaped on his band wagon and never looked back. Just like trump, you consider the truth about you and your actions to be attacks.

hardly - however - you are entitled to your own opinion.

a 'right" - after the First Amendment - wjocj IMHO the DPST party seeks to erode and restrict daily.



and - no matter what 'evidence" was placed in front - it would be denied by those invested in a different opinion, and restricting opinions to that of' 'teh' DPST political narrative. Originally Posted by oeb11

Remember Rosie Ruiz? She "won" the Boston Marathon in 1980 only to have it stripped away when allegations of fraud and cheating emerged. The good liberals of Boston wanted to get to the bottom of whether she did or did not really win the race. Remember, liberals now. They looked for witnesses, they looked for photographs, they went over her medical records and training program. After all, a woman cannot train and stay in her basement and then come out and win the Boston Marathon. Her physical conditioning would not be the same as a real runner. Her resting pulse rate, her endurance were all insufficient to the experts to indicate that she was capable of running a marathon much less winning the Boston Marathon.
They never really PROVED that Ruiz did not win the Marathon but all the anecdotal evidence supported such a conclusion and she was stripped of the title.

It is fact you showed no evidence.
It was also just a matter of time until you used the claim any evidence offered would be denied. You're a joke.
Your position is no evidence is needed. No due process needs to be involved. Only your claims of guilt are required..

In other words, you're a fascist.

Just another trait you project.
You want a do-over "with observers to detect dpst voter fraud".
The fact that there were observers from both parties is well established. Your quote below is well disproven by your posts.

"i welcome cogent and constructive debate from all parties!!"

Tough to have a debate when someone props up a many-time-debunked lie. You claiming no observers, in the face of all findings, hearings, and available sources shows you want no debate.
You waited for trump to blaze the trail for openly lying about virtually anything and you leaped on his band wagon and never looked back. Just like trump, you consider the truth about you and your actions to be attacks.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

A fascist wants to use every conceivable constitutional and legal challenge? That's how you define fascism? You need to go sit in the corner with this tall pointy hat Munchie. You're failing common sense.

A fascist wants to use every conceivable constitutional and legal challenge? That's how you define fascism? You need to go sit in the corner with this tall pointy hat Munchie. You're failing common sense. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

57 court losses. 2 SC losses. Every lie that has attempted to be substantiated has been disproven. An upcoming embarrassing attempt to throw out elector slates from multiple states.

All proves one thing

I think Trump supporters are dumb AF fuck and will believe any crackpot conspiracy theory. Originally Posted by oeb11

No wonder the Republicans fought lawsuit abuse for so long ... they suck at it!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[QUOTE=Jam3768;1062315172][/COLOR]

We just had one. 8 weeks ago.
I love these moronic senators and congressmen that are going to challenge the election results on Jan 6. And of course only in certain states. I can't imagine what would possess them to tie their anchor to such a sinking ship and watch their career go down in flames.

According to the polls, the majority ( by a large margin ) believe, rightly or wrongly, that election fraud was real and Trump was cheated, so continuing to "push back" is exactly what most Republicans want. Don't make the mistake of substituting your idea of right and wrong from somebody else's right and wrong. Taking this stand will be supported by the majority of Republicans. Since I am not a Republican, this action doesn't matter to me, only whether it is constitutional and it appears to be or how else could the action be taken on Jan. 6th? If it is un-constitutional, the SC will say so and invalid anything that comes from it OR NOT!

https://www.courant.com/politics/hc-pol-q-poll-republicans-believe-fraud-20201210-pcie3uqqvrhyvnt7geohhsyepe-story.html

Quinnipiac Poll: 77% of Republicans believe there was widespread fraud in the presidential election

There was as fair of an election as we have ever had.

That goes against the prevailing theory that the more mail in votes produced, the more fraud is likely. Don't believe me, ask the New York Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/u...elections.html

Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises

Yet votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth, statistics show. Election officials reject almost 2 percent of ballots cast by mail, double the rate for in-person voting.


“The more people you force to vote by mail,” Mr. Sancho said, “the more invalid ballots you will generate.”


The trend will probably result in more uncounted votes, and it increases the potential for fraud. While fraud in voting by mail is far less common than innocent errors, it is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention, election administrators say.
[/QUOTE


So, while questioning whether fraud can be proven in a court and it hasn't so far, the prevailing wisdom is that the more mail in votes you get the more "likely" the fraud.

There is certainly no reason to make these ridiculous attempts to upend the constitution and overturn the results of this election.

If over turning the results of this election is provided for in the Constitution and I believe it is whether it should be or not, then this is a legitimate use of time to further examine the results in debate that the Republicans will surely lose. So let them have their last grievance, constitutionally provided to them and this will be done and everybody can pull their panties out of the cracks of their ass.

Oh and by the way -- the results are not going to be overturned. Somehow I think all of you are aware of that fact.

I believe that will be the outcome so why all the ringing of hands?

So oebbie, it would seem to me that you should be way more concerned about President Cheeto and his attempts to invalidate the Constitution instead of spending all your time being so worried about people that do not happen to agree with you.

If his attempt to invalidate the constitutional is un-constitutional, the SC will; tell us that. The facts as I understand them, is that the constitution provides this measure that will be taken Jan. 6th. If it is not constitutional, the SC will say so. If it is constitutional, than it was put in the constitution for a reason, that one more full debate in Congress must be had before the matter is settled. Sit back, relax and watch the constitutional process play out as it was laid out. Biden will be President.

That is not true. It’s an opinion tainted by Trump’s seditious poison.

You fell for a Jedi mind trick, grasshopper.

Great pull. An 8-year-old story! From a source you and your pals regularly discredit as fake news and Trump calls an enemy of the state.

Typical flailing Trump loyalist.

Joe Biden R yo president!

HAHAHAHAHAHAAH!

Like I said a month ago, the fact the Steal-o-crats don't want an open audit is a tell. Especially in Georgia. Originally Posted by gnadfly

The election in the state of Georgia was run by Republicans from top to bottom. The head of elections for Georgia (the guy who did all those press conferences) he VOTED for TRUMP. If there was any cheating, you don't think he would have said something?

The Supreme court of the USA ruled on the case introduced by the Atty General of Texas. What did they say/ write? There are 6 republicans on the Supreme court. Trump put 3 of them on there.

"Texas has no Standing"

Rudy G and the female lawyer that represents Flynn and looks like Frankenstein struck out. The ball game is over. Trump and Pence are going home on 1-20-21.

Like they say at closing time in bars, you don't have go home but do you do have the leave. This would apply to Trump and Pence on 1-20-21. LOL.

HF the silly dreamer. I’m sure his heart breaks all little more with each Trump loss. First the courts and now in the halls of congress. However, unlike Tiny, I hope to see the Republican conference destroyed by their inability to tell Trump it’s over and go sit down.

I love Trumps newest phone call by the way. Indefensible but I’m sure the Idiot Crew will try.