No.good grief
He posted links to opinions.
Not the same. Originally Posted by pfunkdenver
good grief Originally Posted by winn dixie
funkyd has a point. a weak one but a point none the less. they are opinions .. from uber leftist opinion writers on uber leftist sources labeling Joey Corn POOP Biden a ...Now don’t go getting your feeling hurt, but ...
RACIST!
so of course funkyd has to disavow the far leftists branding Beavis Butt-Head Biden as the racist punk he is.
BAHHAAAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
actually .. there is! and it's on Joey Corn Poop Biden!A charity funded by Michael Bloomberg started the petition, not Sleepy Joe. From the link:
even Al Sharpton has said banning menthol smokes is racist!
so Mumbles Biden is a racist bigot!
BAHHAAAA
A Menthol Cigarette Ban Would Perpetuate the Racist War on Drugs
https://cei.org/blog/a-menthol-cigar...-war-on-drugs/
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
A charity funded by Michael Bloomberg started the petition, not Sleepy Joe. From the link:That doesn't shock me at all. Bloomberg thinks he knows best for everyone, the fucking despot.
In 2013 a coalition of health “charities” funded by former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, initiated a citizen petition requesting the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ban menthol cigarettes. But, after years of ignoring the petition,
Bloomberg also wanted to ban 2 liter bottles of Soda in New York city. Originally Posted by adav8s28
You are seriously clueless why they want to ban menthol cigarettes, has nothing to do with children, but has a lot to do with addiction to nicotine, with menthol making nicotine addiction easier to get hooked on and harder to get off.If they cared about your safety they wouldn't make the shit. They also wouldn't use a chemical process with the use of Ammonia called "Impact Boosting" to render Nicotine more easily absorbed, which renders it more addictive. The warning labels are for liability purposes for the "Seven Dwarfs" (Tobacco Companies). They can be sued put they never seem to lose.
You're right if you want to harm yourself fuck just do it. you don't think that tobacco companies put warnings on cigarette packs for your safety, LOL... it's to keep you from suing them, you can't say you didn't know this may harm you since they tell you so on every single pack this shit is bad for you, that's why no one is suing them these days since they been doing this since the late 60's, you have to been a smoker before then to be able to sue, and most of them are dead now who could. Originally Posted by dreamvacationdates
Wait a minute . . . .All this menthol ban talk refocuses the anti-tobacco hype of the last few decades .I think marijuana smoke is less harmful to the lungs. They put all type of chemicals into tobacco to make it palatable. Have you ever tried smoking pure, unadulterated tobacco? I have. You can't even smoke that shit. It's like an American Spirit times one thousand. Tobacco also absorbs radioactive isotopes, for some reason.
For thirty years or more, we have had serious activist campaigns directed at banning tobacco consumption in all forms but mostly smoking, forced on us. Its been pretty effective too. Light one up now about anywhere and you are castigated as an anti-social bad actor.
And yet in the same time period, over half the states have legalized Marajuana consumption in all forms. Aside from the recreational effects, what makes Marajuana smoke any less deleterious to one's health than tobacco smoke? Anyone looked in the bottome of a pipe the morning after the night before?
How is Marajuana tar any less harmful to the lungs? What about secondary smoke? Originally Posted by ICU 812