It was wrong when Obama did it, but because Obama did it, it's therefore right when Trump does it. But if it's now right, doesn't that mean it was also right when Obama did it. So what were the complaints about?
So which one is it: Is it wrong or right? Or is this a way of admitting that it is wrong, but we'll allow it because Obama did it? Because that would mean that you essentially sold out your personal moral values and no longer care about right vs wrong. Which is a bad thing when the left does it, but is now ok because the left did it?
And doesn't this mean that everything Obama did is either right, or potentially correct if Trump ever also decides to do it? Is anyone comfortable making that claim?
Ones sense of logic to essentially boils down to a crappy computer program:
If Trump did it, it = right.
If Obama did it, it = wrong.
If Trump and Obama did it, it = <brain broken; begin trolling>
This is what happens when you no longer have any personal values. Must be a living nightmare.
Originally Posted by jayjaychrome
Hey JJ, good post! You walked us through the logical contradictions involved here. I mean, weaponizing the federal government to go after your political opponents is nasty and objectionable and wrong - no matter WHO does it, correct? We all know two wrongs don't make a right. This is like getting into a fight with your brother when you're 6 years old. You try to tell your mother "But HE started it!" as if that somehow makes you blameless. So she scolds you for reacting to his provocation and urges you to take the high road. (She doesn't tell you she is secretly proud of you for fighting back, because otherwise your brother would just keep on provoking fights lol.)
It seems like Republicans (at least some of them) are engaging in private soul-searching over this. Should we seek "retribution"? Or will that make us look and feel as slimy and unprincipled as the Democrats were when they invented lawfare? If we do nothing, what will deter the Dems from weaponizing government against us again & again whenever the opportunity arises in the future?
Here's an idea, JJ - why don't you apply your superior powers of logic to getting inside the head of those Democrats who persecuted trumpy relentlessly in the first place? How did THEY justify weaponizing the powers of the federal government and abusing the judiciary for partisan political purposes? They had to know it was wrong. Weren't they outraged and indignant when Nixon tried to do the same during the Watergate era? At least Tricky Dicky felt ashamed and apologized.
How did Democrats justify their misconduct? Did they convince themselves that trump is a nazi fascist authoritarian existential threat to democracy, who must be stopped at all costs - even if it means bending all the rules and lying to the Congress and the public about it?
Does the end justify the means? We must destroy the village in order to save it - remember that one? Help me out here, JJ. How do the soulless Dems sleep at night? Is their thinking logical at all?