ATTN Providers – Most Hobbyists Hate Tattoos

an honest question for the guys ...

you are looking for a companion to take to an upscale social event, Black Tie/Little Black Dress.

Would you pick a girl with full sleeve/legging ink or a girl with no ink? Originally Posted by CJ7

I think I would look at tattoos as no more than a tie-breaker, assuming they are nicely done, not trash/gangsta. There is a huge difference.

A lady's ability to hold a conversation, act refined, etc., are far more important in those circles in my mind.

I have taken ladies with visible tattoos (not full arms, etc., but some visible artistic ones) to upper end restaurants, Lincoln Center opera, and black tie dinners with dignataries. No issues because of the ink.

Personally I do not like them if they are:
1) in prominent places that are not covered by clothes
2) large
3) multiple

Maybe I am old-school, but when I see a 50-60 yr old with a droppy razor-wire tattoo on a flabby bicep/tricep, I always wonder if they ever regret getting that done.... a friend is a dermatologist in FL and has a thriving business on the laser removal of body art - he gets referrals from tattoo shops all the time when former customers ask about tattoo removal

Wow OP your far reaching theory of everybody hates tat was quickly dismantled... Next time try not to paint us all with such a broad brush.

an honest question for the guys ...

you are looking for a companion to take to an upscale social event, Black Tie/Little Black Dress.

Would you pick a girl with full sleeve/legging ink or a girl with no ink? Originally Posted by CJ7

Haha I would pick a girl with ink and buy her a dress that shows just a hint. Of course, garter belt and no underwear would be nice. But I digress

You are reading more into my post than is actually there, but that's okay. Just an observation: I read a few of your recent reviews to see what comments there were about your tattoos, and the first 2 that mentioned them said "She has a few tattoos BUT are nicely done." and ". . . various tattoos including wrist, back, upper leg, BUT nothing distasteful." Why do you think reviewers almost always include a "but"? Originally Posted by Gecko

Because they're giving a heads up to other guys that I have tattoos. But, I don't hide the fact I have them, I'm always honest about them. As I said, my clients like my tats.

My wrist tattoo is a pink ribbon because I survived breast cancer. My back piece, well....that's just something that needs to be seen in person to appreciate the art work.....upper leg? I have one on my hip....eagle feather because I'm Native American Indian.

None of my clients are paying to fuck my tats and my tats aren't sucking their dicks.

Thanks for speaking on behalf of "MOST" the men.

None of my clients are paying to fuck my tats and my tats aren't sucking their dicks. Originally Posted by MsElena

That sounds like a whole new kink

an honest question for the guys ...

you are looking for a companion to take to an upscale social event, Black Tie/Little Black Dress.

Would you pick a girl with full sleeve/legging ink or a girl with no ink? Originally Posted by CJ7

My tats are purposely placed in areas that can be covered for upscale social/ black tie events. No sleeves or tit tats. I dont date tat a mans name on my body. My tats are actually artistic.

[quote=CJ7;2256068]

the very upscale low volume (high class, if you will) providers who have rates exceeding $1000 for social events dont wear any ink.

Ive been attended such events and rates higher than that to attend... on all occassions the gentlemen found it quite exciting that my tats were easily covered in my formal dress and i looked like a classy good girl...... and then when we got bcd.. and exposed the tats it went from good girl to bad girl with tats.

That sounds like a whole new kink Originally Posted by Graycoat

I'm always up for trying something new.

As someone that has seen Elena's tatoos I can say they are done in good taste and in no way detract from her body or her ability. If she has a large rubber penis in her hand that however is fucking scary. lol Dis boy don't do dat.

I have never been distracted by tattoos. I don't have any, but I don't care. It is just a fad that will pass, but unlike other fads this is pretty much permanent.

+1
I don't mind at all.

It's the woman I'm fucking...not her tattoos. Originally Posted by john353

Preach brother....

It’s a fact that in MOST guys’ opinions, tattoos tend to make a girl look less educated, less pretty, less sexy, cheaper, more ghetto, more trailer trashy, and/or rougher than girls with no tattoos. Of course there are exceptions to everything, such as young guys with no money and plenty of tattoos of their own who will tell you they love tattoos. But guys with money, who are generally older and more educated (the hobbyists who are willing to spend more money on you), view them as a turn-off. I’m one of them and actually willing to pay a premium for girls with no tattoos.



I’m sure lots of guys just put up with tattoos because it’s getting harder to find girls who don’t have them. So if you’re a guy who claims you don’t mind them, I would ask, would you prefer your ATF didn’t have them? Originally Posted by Gecko

I think the OP is out to lunch on this one. Trailer trash is trailer trash, you don' need a tattoo to qualify.

To me it does not matter if a girl has tattoo's or not, but if she does, for me it should be tasteful. If a girl has a tattoo or two that is tasteful and classy, they look more sexy and hotter in my opinion. I have two SP's that I see fairly regularly, one has a very classy & sexy tattoo that is a full back and down one thigh that I find extremely hot and yummy and she is a favourite of mine. Another girl is a pinup model and UTR, she has a few tattoo's, and while they are not what I would choose, she looks hot and is a killer provider when she is working.

It is the person, not the tattoo, that makes you, "less educated, less pretty, less sexy, cheaper, more ghetto, more trailer trashy, and/or rougher. You can take the girl/client, out of the trailer, but you can't take the trailer (trash) out of them.

For the record OP,I would be one of those guys, like you, with money, am older, educated and willing to spend money to see a lady I want and I view the girls I see with tattoos, such as the two listed above as very classy, sexy and a turn on.

There is much more to a woman than some tattoos, a pretty narrow outlook IMHO.

Well said the.namssa.

I think it is an age thing. I'd like to know the OPs age. I'm in my 40s, and I detest tattoos for all the reasons mentioned by the OP. Those from my generation and probably most of those older than me are old school. Tattoos are for truck drivers, the Navy, bikers and criminals. Never once for those in my generation would we ever expect to see a lady with a tattoo. It just never happened. Now for those of a younger generation, they have seen those old school ideas wash away. From about the early to mid 90s, they became more fashionable. So for those under 35 or so, Tattoos probably are not an issue and there is probably no stigma associated with having a tattoo. For me, I've reluctantly have come to accept the fact that the pool of tattoo -free providers is probably dwindling. I can over look a couple of non-distracting tattoos. However, it is a major deciding factor for me. I will look at photos specifically to see if the gal has a tattoo. The one tattoo that I utterly dislike is the tramp stamp. If I know a provider has a tramp stamp, I most likely won't see her because for me, it is a distraction during doggie style.

Tattoos are for truck drivers, the Navy, bikers and criminals. Originally Posted by Cpalmson

I know more than a few people that would agree with this. This is exactly how I felt before I entered the hobby. Also a few guys I've spent time with have told me they felt like it was disfiguring. I personally don't think it make sense to write on my body with ink. I once considered it but I thought to myself "what's this going to look like when I'm 50?" I would get one of those fake tattoos in a heartbeat but a real one? Nah. lol. To each their own I guess.