I watched a documentary last night about pimps & I started to wonder. With all the control pimps exert over his "hoes" do people still believe an escort agencies are just as bad?
My argument is this: agencies don't "recruit" ladies, especially minors.
Agencies don't take all their $.
Agencies don't keep their ladies in their sight at all times.
Agencies don't slave drive or force women to work. They work by choice.
However:
I can see how the two are similar in other ways. Any thoughts?
Thanks
Originally Posted by ali*cat
Well escort agencies aren't nearly as bad as pimps are. I think everyone reading this thread realizes that. I've used agencies in the past and my experience with them has been fair, so to say.
My biggest complaint on agenices is when they give a description of a lady, their usually WAY OFF! Up-selling was never really an issue from an agency girl. The client never knows what he's gonna get when using an agency unless you've seen a girl multiple times.
In the past I would talk to ladies who worked for an agency and would ask them if I could see them while "cutting out the middle man" (the agency). An overwhelming number of women would agree and I think I only had one that said, "no call the agency if you want to see me." I think she was pimp controlled to say the least. I'd much rather give a woman everything vs. having a 3rd party involved! BTW, I don't see agency girls anymore. That ended a long time ago.
It seems as if agencies are for ladies just starting out in the hobby and don't know much about the game, cause if they did, they wouldn't be there! It doesn't make any sense for a woman to be under the thumb of a pimp.
Sadly to say women will continue to be pimped by men and women and I don't see that changing anytime soon! Times have changed though since the days of the internet and so has hobbying evolved!