Yep, O'Blunder Cares About Jobs...riiiigghht.

Really lots of excuses for the Senate not working on a budget. None of it helps. If the Senate doesn't like the House budget, at least vote on it. They can also mark it up and send it back to the House through the reconciliation process.

Facts are, they don't want a budget, because they will have to be on record for supporting either increased spending or decreased spending, and it gives the Democrats in the Senate political ammo to use against Republicans, and finally, it leaves no restrictions on spending. Spending is what wins votes. And spending is how you reward your contributors and your owners.

See how neatly it works to not have a budget?

Or increased taxes on the top 1%

If you're such a fucking expert Unaliar, then how did Romney get waxed? I think you predicted a different outcome, no? ,

No, I predicted an Obama win, Assup. I did originally predict a landslide, but later thought it might be narrower, but I always predicted an Obama win. Why are you continuing to tell lies about me, Assup? Oh, I remember, you're the . . .

DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR 2013

ASSUP!!!

Really lots of excuses for the Senate not working on a budget. None of it helps. If the Senate doesn't like the House budget, at least vote on it. They can also mark it up and send it back to the House through the reconciliation process.

Facts are, they don't want a budget, because they will have to be on record for supporting either increased spending or decreased spending, and it gives the Democrats in the Senate political ammo to use against Republicans, and finally, it leaves no restrictions on spending. Spending is what wins votes. And spending is how you reward your contributors and your owners.

See how neatly it works to not have a budget? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Exactly. Yet the liberal media can't figure it out....or doesn't want to.

Really lots of excuses for the Senate not working on a budget. None of it helps. If the Senate doesn't like the House budget, at least vote on it. They can also mark it up and send it back to the House through the reconciliation process.

Facts are, they don't want a budget, because they will have to be on record for supporting either increased spending or decreased spending, and it gives the Democrats in the Senate political ammo to use against Republicans, and finally, it leaves no restrictions on spending. Spending is what wins votes. And spending is how you reward your contributors and your owners.

See how neatly it works to not have a budget? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Spot on, COG. Budget = Accountability.

As per law, Obama has submitted a budget for each fiscal year he’s been president -- fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012, according to a quick check on the Government Printing Office’s website, where the documents are posted. It’s as simple as that.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...itted-budgets/




http://www.gpo.gov/help/about_budget...government.htm Originally Posted by CJ7

True, Obama has eventually submitted a budget, late (which violates the law in itself) but eventually. My point was that Uncle Harry has failed to push it through the Senate, or even let it be brought up for markup/reconciliation...whichever.

April 22, 2010 – The Budget Committee completes action on a mark-up and reports a budget out of committee, but the Democrat majority chooses to keep its own plan from being offered on the Senate floor. This is the last time the Majority conducted a legally required markup.

May 18, 2011 – Majority Leader Reid says it would be “foolish” for Senate Democrats to offer a budget.

May 25, 2011 – The Senate rejects President Obama’s FY 2012 budget by a vote of 0-97. They don't even bother with a markup

February 3, 2012 – Days after Chairman Conrad promised to hold a budget mark-up in committee, Majority Leader Reid declares that the Senate would not consider a budget for the third straight year.

April 29, 2012 – Three years pass since Senate Democrats adopted a budget.

And now Obama is going to be late (again and in violation of the law) submitting a FY2014 budget.
Keeps on kicking the can.

Exactly. Yet the liberal media can't figure it out....or doesn't want to. Originally Posted by gnadfly

The are VERY well aware it, the general American population is not. And many couldn't care less, as long as that check(s) shows up every month.

Or increased taxes on the top 1%

If you're such a fucking expert Unaliar, then how did Romney get waxed? I think you predicted a different outcome, no? , Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

He got beat because of indifference by the repubs, and all the lazy cocksuckers on the government tit, and fucking feel good libtards like you sup.

He got beat because of indifference by the repubs, and all the lazy cocksuckers on the government tit, and fucking feel good libtards like you sup. Originally Posted by seedman55

Lazy? You have no fucking idea, do you?

You gotta job, seedy? Please don't tell me you're an English professor.

Catholic priest? I'd believe that!

He got beat because Obama beat him. It certainly wan't because all the teabaggers weren't in a proper froth. God knows that the high-pitched whine of Chicken Littles from coast to coast coated the airwaves, the commercial networks, etc., from the dawn of the campaign.

Romney got beat because he was a lie. The GOP was a lie. The people spoke.

Period.

I suppose there's just that many more LIBTARDS in America than Neanderthal mouth breathers like you, Seedy.