. Originally Posted by Austin DudeYou really are pathetic, millsy.
You mean this completely discredited dossier???Fake News on your part. You said completely discredited... It wasn't completely discredited. It has actually been proven that parts of it are true.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ussian-collus/
You know, Comey offered $50,000 for it...
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-...trump-dossier/
Can you believe that idiot was FBI Director???
What a dumb-ass! Originally Posted by gfejunkie
You really are pathetic, millsy. Originally Posted by gfejunkieHahahaha show the bias that a dumbass tried to use as a defense and instead of responded to that, you have to call me someone else and pathetic.
You're a moron. The Daily Caller is a right wing outlet. Not to mention the bias and conflict of interest. If you are citing a story on the Daily Caller about CNN, maybe think about the fact that the it's run in part by a guy who works for the direct competitor of CNN. If fact people have quit the outlet because Tucker Carlson had refused to publish their articles because it went against the right wing ideology. So yeah, that's the BOOOM you just dropped on all of us. An article by a site that's founded/ran by a guy who works for the competition of the company being talked about. Originally Posted by Austin DudeHere you go, jack-ass!
You mean this completely discredited dossier???
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ussian-collus/
You know, Comey offered $50,000 for that piece of crap ...
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-...trump-dossier/
Can you believe that idiot was FBI Director???
What a dumb-ass! Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Here you go, jack-ass!Thank you. You made my point for me. Anyone who doesn't have their head up Trump's ass can read the Daily Caller article compared to the other one and see the difference. Here's a hint. Read the last few paragraphs of the Tucker Carlson one. Hell look at the headlines. Botched v. retracted article. See the difference there. Or do you get lost with in the nuance of the words being used? The Daily Caller just happened to talk about Trump calling CNN Fake News. I wonder why Tucker Carlson would approve of that? If showing how hilariously idiotic you are makes me a jack-ass. I will gladly be the jack-ass. You're a dumbass.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/medi...cle/index.html
Since you're so particular where you get your facts from. Straight from CNN FAKE NEWS. You eat that shit up. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Interesting development...Just remember that O'Keefe is a conniving rat fuckin' proven liar (ACORN, Planned Parenthood, etc.) and that connections between the Trump campaign/administration and Russia are still under active investigation.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...t_ratings.html
Vindication. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Just remember that O'Keefe is a conniving rat fuckin' proven liar (ACORN, Planned Parenthood, etc.) and that connections between the Trump campaign/administration and Russia are still under active investigation. Originally Posted by ObservingAwesome... O'Keefe strikes again!
Awesome... O'Keefe strikes again!ACORN?
He's a conniver, ain't he? He connives with ACORN and Planned Parenthood and CNN to get them to tell the truth!
Originally Posted by lustylad
You reduced Dan Greenfield's devastating essay against those so-called MSM "fact-checkers" to a one-word rebuke. Originally Posted by lustylad
No. The losers are over at CNN and the New York Times. What's left of'em.You honestly expect to be taken seriously when you quote the Daily Caller, Breitbart and Russia News and your sources?
Originally Posted by gfejunkie