Biden Family Crime Syndicate

The article doesn't say what you say it says. No apologies necessary because you're lying. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
... And you're wrong... It's that simple.

... Let's settle the dispute - why don't you tell
us all what's wrong with the article and what's wrong
with what I revealed.

And furthermore - why don't you surely LOOK BACK
at what's been revealed in this whole thread
- most of it from James Comer and The House
Oversight Committee - and tell us again how
their revelations are all lies.

... We'll simply wait here.

But whatever else you do - please Stay Tuned!

#### Salty
Already addressed what the article says and doesn't say. As well as how you lied in your statement.

Just stop lying.
Precious_b's Avatar
... No speculation here -... Originally Posted by Salty Again
Oh. It's ALL speculation. Not ONE court case showing indictment for crime. Which reminds me, when you having the Mod changing the title to this thread to Whataboutism et al?

No evidence. Just accusations. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
No joke. Continually refuses to present proof of what he states. Not for the lack of us asking.

And I have been so kind by presenting the definition of crime and giving examples.

So, let me be helpful in showing that these are examples of crimes by donny&co. Please note, the article dismisses alot of convictions.

Salty doesn't have a clue what he's talking about. He just makes up stuff or parrots silliness from websites with zero credibility. He's not once provided a link to back up anything he's stated. The reason is pretty simple, there are none from anything even vaguely similar to a reputable source. That's why he doesn't even bother to provide a link because he knows they are bullshit garbage support for his even worse crap statements.
... Originally Posted by 1blackman1
Wish he would just show us one link to a court case that joey lost that proves what the current title of this thread is.

Come On Salty! I know you can.
Can we have a group chant to help NaCl along into posting such?

Did you actually read the article or did you just peruse the title. It's completely misleading.

The actual data shows that then vice-president Joe Biden's office communicated via email thousands of time over multiple years. It doesn't actually claim to show any proof of wrongdoing other than the number of emails. They don't even show that they all came directly from Joe Biden.

As I said earlier a lot of sturm und drang but no actual proof of any kind. Please get back to us when you find the singing fat lady. Originally Posted by txdot-guy
Oh, he has a very long standing habit of deflecting from the truth so as we won't notice he is standing as naked as the king without clothes.
eyecu2's Avatar
So give us a reasonable explanation for the Shell corporations that the Biden family has that they were taking foreign money from China, Syria, and Ukraine. What expertise did the family businesses have that resulted in 10 MIL payouts? Originally Posted by texassapper
Nobody has to prove their innocence in the USA. You're presumed innocent till PROVEN guilty. Which nullifies the need for hypothetical situations of impropriety or validation of the dispersal of funds.

BUT
What hasn't happened is the Comer crew of farmer boy and wrestling coach-jock strap Jordan being able to identify a crime and payment to Joe Biden.

There is no smoking gun or secret decoder ring to this whole charade that the GOP has cooked up. Jesus, they can't even balance a checkbook, or a budget, or figure out how many votes they gotta bribe to get Jordan in as speaker. How will two dumbass hicks like that connect all the rest of the "supposed" dots?

I'll give you a hint-they were never going to do that - intent was simply to damage Biden, but instead of succeeding, they are looking like a bunch of ass clown monkeys fucking a football. Fairly certain that Comer has a family of raccoons living in his brain, and finally chewed through all the wires - because every time he starts to talk he sounds like something inside is gone terribly wrong.

What a pant load!
biomed1's Avatar
Members are more interested in arguing with one another, than debating the issue without insults, attacks or rudeness . . .


Thread Closed
  • #1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.
  • #3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.
  • #4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.
  • #6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.