You don't have a clue about the law regarding negligence and the standards of care required for ALL government employees, especially including Cabinet members. Take a lesson from someone else who posts in this forum and understands classification rules much better than you do... he is appalled at Hillary for being "gross(ly) negligent and (showing) willful disregard for highly sensitive material... that puts US security superiority at very significant risk--a borderline treasonous act. Anything less than a long jail sentence is a joke."Lad, from your link. I guess you forgot to read this part.
http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1058216943&postcount=49 Originally Posted by lustylad
This was copied from the link that was posted by LAD in Post #395.
The analysis also showed that the practice of using non-secure email systems to send sensitive information was widespread at the department and elsewhere in government.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...html?tid=a_inl
May I remind that this is from your link LAD. Mishandling of sensitive information was widespread at the state department and elsewhere in government.
Good luck getting an indictment with this. The FBI has had the emails for nine plus months. So far a grand jury has not been convened.
Originally Posted by flghtr65
Don't hold your breath. The case with the mistress and Petraus is just another example of how widespread the mishandling of classified information is in the government. Those UFC rules were put in place so that classified information did not end up in the hands of a spy, not to catch a sitting SOS in gotcha moment trying to communicate with staffers.
