Actually is verified before any payout occurs. And hospitals get money for services provided, not deaths.
is that before or after they get their covid death stipend? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
When one receives supplemental income and tax break/credits for reporting certain "facts" based on the number of "facts" reported, then there is a motivation to "over" report the "facts" particularly when the reporting party has control of the documentation to substantiate the "facts" reported.
There is a distinctive scientific/medical difference between dying OF Covid (or any disease/illness) and dying while having been tested "positive" for Covid (or any disease/illness).
Now ... one of the physician-scientist-experts posting on Eccie .. please list the physical parts of the body that Covid attacks to result in the death of any given person. Thank you!
That academic exercise is similar to the medical examiner rendering an opinion as to "the manner" of death as opposed to a physician rendering an opinon as to "the cause" of death. There is a distinction with a difference. A critical difference.
Another completely different topic:
"Omicron" .... the CommunistSocialistDNC newly created "PANDEMIC" to justify controlled elections.
I heard a report just the other day that a person died of it in Houston! Died of "Omicron"!!!!
That will be a "scientifc-medical" historical event .... someone died of a sore-throad. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Is determination always an opinion? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
What are you babbling about? Originally Posted by LexusLover
��BREAKING NEWS
UK Government admit that the vaccines have damaged the natural immune systems of the double jabbed.
The British government has spilled the beans about that fact that once you get double jabbed, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity against Covid variants - or possibly any virus.
So let’s watch the ‘real’ pandemic begin now!
In its Week 42 “COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report,” the U.K. Health Security Agency admitted on page 23 that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” It goes on to explain that this antibody drop is basically permanent.
What’s this mean?
We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).
What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.
In the long term, people who take the vaccine will be far more vulnerable to any mutations in the spike protein that might come along, even if they have already been infected and recovered once, or more than once.
The unvaccinated, meanwhile, will procure lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being infected with it naturally even just once.
Read it for yourself.. Page 24.
https://assets.publishing.service.go...rt-week-42.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.go...rt-week-42.pdf Originally Posted by bambino
I ask a five word question, and I'm babbling? You mention a supposéd report and you go on about a "soar-throad", but I'm babbling.You're just being silly Eccieuser. "Is determination always an opinion?" Of course not. A determination is, however, an opinion when it conflicts with Lexus Lover's prejudices.
I thought the red was the most important part of your post. I guess you didn't.
A medical examiner is a physician.
Are determinations just opinions? Or medical facts? Are Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
All deaths can be attributed to Trump, none to Biden.I don't buy that. A lot of what happened would have happened regardless of who was president. The virus, the mutations, the actions of the CDC and FDA, state and local health departments, state and local governments, and the willingness of the populace to take measures to prevent the spread of the disease -- all were largely beyond the purview of the president.
In comparison this is how I look at it. What if a national disaster like a nuclear accident or heck a limited nuke war happened when trump (or any president) was in office. A disaster like this could take lives for several years past due to exposure. So is the next president responsible for deaths from the previous disaster? Nope, it happened on the watch of the president during their time in office.
People are still dying from exposure at the 9/11 site. Those Obama's fault? Trump's fault? Nope, Bush is still killing people from his mistakes. Originally Posted by royamcr
The USA was 10th in the world in terms of COVID deaths per capita. Originally Posted by TinyIs that based on your "science" degree expertise?
There has been ZERO verfication of the cause of death or even the presence of Covid in any deaths. Originally Posted by LexusLoverYou still haven't explained why 503,000 more people died, of all causes, in 2020 than 2019. Since you won't click on any links that conflict with your prejudices, purportedly because they contain viruses, I'll break this down for you, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2778234
You and yours keep regurgitating stats published by Bittens bullshit agencies to justify another round of shutting down, requiring more shots, and isolation to facilitate voter fraud ... AGAIN! Originally Posted by LexusLoverThe federal government should not enforce shut downs, more shots, or isolation in the private sector. Most of the population has some immunity from COVID through vaccination and/or previous infection. We should be OK for the most part going forward, especially those who exercise good judgement by getting the vaccine, and by wearing N95 and KN95 masks and social distancing when appropriate.