Judge Napolitano of Fox has been saying for weeks that Trump committed obstruction of justice with this example. Originally Posted by adav8s28
Judge Napolitano of Fox has been saying for weeks that Trump committed obstruction of justice with this example. Originally Posted by adav8s28He's certainly been saying that, but often in a rather wishy washy, it was somewhat "indirect" obstruction, but under strict rule of law could be considered obstruction, but really couldn't be convicted in court so the House would need to do it through impeachment.
Of the ten examples that Mueller listed, this one would be the easiest to prove. Even though McGahn did not carry out the request, you can be guilty of obstruction by making an attempt. I don't know if the case that Pelosi is trying to build will have anything stronger than this one example. Judge Napolitano of Fox has been saying for weeks that Trump committed obstruction of justice with this example. Originally Posted by adav8s28Yep, three testimonies should do it, Mcgahn, Annie McDonald and Mueller. Combover Caligula knows he obstructed because he was advised against making the multiple attempts to remove Mueller. He asked Mcghan and KT McFarland to falsify documents to cover his lying ass.
So it is a God give right?That's exactly what the fuck the Founding Fathers declared in the Declaration of Independence when they wrote: "... endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights ..."
And what about guilty defendants, do they get a God given right? Originally Posted by WTF
That's exactly what the fuck the Founding Fathers declared in the Declaration of Independence when they wrote: "... endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights ..."Who the fuck is your creator? God? You believe in a fucking God? Does he talk to you? Could you ask your imagery friend to write these things do for all to see?
.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Who the fuck is your creator? God? You believe in a fucking God? Does he talk to you? Could you ask your imagery friend to write these things do for all to see? Originally Posted by WTFI have yet to see someone who believes as you do explain the origin of life without referencing a "belief" in some undocumented event at some point in an unknown past which no one witnessed or can actually explain.
Poor bastard will be shunned now by Fox News~FYI, this nation's sheep voted for hildebeest.
Originally Posted by WTF