Providers who have been run off the board by trolls...

What you are describing is less concrete than bullshit and more like smoke and mirrors with selective spotlighting.

Switzerland sure is nice this time of year. Originally Posted by YummyMarie
I still don't see anyone posting any solid evidence. Absent that, and given that WTF has admitted to not having evidence ... what conclusion can you draw? That's it's speculative bullshit.
hornfreak's Avatar
The WK force is strong tonite......
The WK force is strong tonite...... Originally Posted by hornfreak
I don't have any reason to WK for anyone. I'm asking people to prove their allegations and no one has been able to do so ... Nothing more, Nothing less.
I honestly don't see SF's stance as WKing. He's being objective, rather than subjective. The truth is probably somewhere in between.
I'll take that under advisement sir...I'll just scroll through your reviews and see which one of them spa hunnies I could procure.

Originally Posted by Island_Gent
LOL! G, those are just throw-aways. Nice & easy ... no scheduling, no screening, get a massage and your relaxation and no retaliation when you write a review. Sometimes I much prefer a good massage+ than a fuck and you get PA for the review. So, tell us all about how you got outed ...
OJ was acquitted, if you saw the newsflash.
Just because OJ was acquitted, does not mean he didn't do it
The "How'd you know" could just as easily have been a smartass sarcastic comment, not an admission of anything, but someone turning your own comment back on you...

The fact of the matter is simply ... you are basing everything you are saying on pure speculation upon speculation and you have no facts ... it's all bullshit. Plain and simple. Originally Posted by StinkyFingers
It's really not as plain and simple as you would like to think. And definitely not all bullshit. True the FACTS are behind the pink curtain, and even if we could see there, we wouldn't be able to post it here. So there is no proof to satisfy you're anal retentive mind. But there are behavioral patterns that substantiate what's been said. There are multiple reports of her seeking information on multiple members. Collaborating statements, not fact, not enough for a conviction. But like OJ, just because she not convicted, doesn't mean she didn't do it.

Basically, this is not am attempt to get anyone banned or outed, this is just a headsup to anyone who cares about keeping their personal information confidential. Proceed at your own peril.
Pretty sure providers do the same shit..whatever she posted about you could have been posted in public no?No nothing was posted in public at that time
Did Suzy Q get banned??pointed?? No Check again

Speaking of Suzy Q ..you somehow seem to believe she is NM's alias but can't provide any proof
It could be anyone.. even one these guys u constantly beef with(with access to the ladies private area. Originally Posted by NubianPrince
Check again friend, Suzy Q is banned. It took awhile to find out who was pulling her puppet strings, but that account it's not active today. The person behind it is still kicking though. For Now.

I honestly don't see SF's stance as WKing. He's being objective, rather than subjective. The truth is probably somewhere in between. Originally Posted by YummyMarie
Nope, the truth is I have no reason to WK for NM whatsoever.

I am simply calling out those making allegations to prove it up and no one has presented any concrete evidence ... All we've heard is: "some have said" and "I speculated" ... There's no in between if no one can present evidence to prove their case ... especially if "the source" is from an area of the Board to which they do not have access.
dearhunter's Avatar
I honestly don't see SF's stance as WKing. He's being objective, rather than subjective. The truth is probably somewhere in between. Originally Posted by YummyMarie
No it is not..........but, you and I know the truth.........so, we are not allowed to play.

You could pull a Lexi and clear things up..........heh
It's really not as plain and simple as you would like to think. And definitely not all bullshit. True the FACTS are behind the pink curtain, and even if we could see there, we wouldn't be able to post it here. So there is no proof to satisfy you're anal retentive mind. But there are behavioral patterns that substantiate what's been said. There are multiple reports of her seeking information on multiple members. Collaborating statements, not fact, not enough for a conviction. But like OJ, just because she not convicted, doesn't mean she didn't do it.

Basically, this is not am attempt to get anyone banned or outed, this is just a headsup to anyone who cares about keeping their personal information confidential. Proceed at your own peril. Originally Posted by H.Hardhat
LOL! I may be anal retentive in demanding facts, but I sure as hell am not the one who is crying about being outed. Maybe you ought to learn how to pucker up your mouthhole a little bit.

So, have you seen direct evidence to support your allegation?

... or did someone just tell you from behind the pink curtain about what you allege?
No it is not..........but, you and I know the truth.........so, we are not allowed to play.

You could pull a Lexi and clear things up..........heh Originally Posted by dearhunter
LOL! Does that mean the Pink Panther peeks behind the Pink Curtain?
Regardless of truth/lies/speculation/outting/acquittals...I think the bottom line is "think before you act." Weigh the pros and cons of the possible outcomes then proceed with the appropriate level of caution accordingly. In an unregulated industry, it's up to the individual to decide which direction the next step- or lack of- should be in.
No it is not..........but, you and I know the truth.........so, we are not allowed to play.

You could pull a Lexi and clear things up..........heh Originally Posted by dearhunter
No thancks. I enjoy my paycheck.
rduke4923's Avatar
502 in and heading nowhere fast.
irony is strong in this thread.
LOL! G, those are just throw-aways. Nice & easy ... no scheduling, no screening, get a massage and your relaxation and no retaliation when you write a review. Sometimes I much prefer a good massage+ than a fuck and you get PA for the review. So, tell us all about how you got outed ... Originally Posted by StinkyFingers
Not to cast aspersions on how any of you mongers get down, but we hobby differently bruh.

I thought I'd gone on ad infinitum on this, I log in on e and see my shit in public, for no apparent reason. Didn't argue with anyone, didn't call anyone any names...just out there for no reason. Those are the facts.

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-05-2015, 11:12 PM
OJ was acquitted, if you saw the newsflash.

The "How'd you know" could just as easily have been a smartass sarcastic comment, not an admission of anything, but someone turning your own comment back on you.

. Originally Posted by StinkyFingers
OJ was acquitted but was guilty as fuck. That is the part you do not understand. This is not a court of law it ia a court of public opinion lot lower standard ...kinda like the Civil Trial where OJ was found guilty.

And Natalia did not make a sarcastic comment....she put an alert out about infoshare! She alerted ladies not to post in there! Do you understand how fucking stupid that was? It means you do not have to believe me, believe her response.

Look....I'm not going to be speculating about the ladies vindictiveness place of hate called infoshare any more because the powers that be do not like my psychological advantage it seems I have over these thin skinned females. I will continue to retract your Johnny Cockran bullshit in how you are trying to spin this.


.