The Mueller report

I B Hankering's Avatar
After Corney publicly confirmed the existence ofthe FBT's Russia investigation on March 20, 2017, the President was "beside himself' and expressed anger that Corney did not issue a statement correcting any misperception that the President himself was under investigation. The President sought to speak with Acting Attorney General Boente directly and told McGahn to contact Boente to request that Corney make a clarifying statement. The President then asked other intelligence community leaders to make public statements to refute the suggestion that the President had links to Russia, but the leaders told him they could not publicly comment on the
investigation. On March 30 and April 11, against the advice of White House advisors who had informed him that any direct contact with the FBI could be perceived as improper interference in an ongoing investigation, the President made personal outreaches to Corney asking him to "lift the cloud" ofthe Russia investigation by making public the fact that the President was not personally under investigation.

Through out Volume ll are incidents of Putin’s punk requesting that members of his swamp cover his fat lying ass. McGhan, McDonald, McFarland, Coates, Cohen, Comey, Sessions were all approached by Lardass to falsify documents, make public statements of his innocence and join his obstruction campaign. They all refused to cover for the lying piece of shit while he barked “Fake News”.
Originally Posted by Jaxson66

^^^^^^^^^^^^^DELUSION^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^

.....................REALITY
˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅



“I have long believed that a President can fire an FBI director for any reason, or for no reason at all,” Former FBI Director James Comey.
Jaxson66's Avatar
Corner stone of this country is "INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY" The liberal socialist what to change that little fact to ""Its what we say""

And very sadly its clear some people don't understand that statement ...... Originally Posted by rexdutchman

Horse shit, it’s crystal clear who has read the report and who hasn’t. The so called Freedom Caucus showed their ignorance of facts yesterday and displayed their loyalty to trump and Russia. It’s like they don’t give a damn that Russia cyber attacked this Country.
Jaxson66's Avatar
^^^^^^^^^^^^^DELUSION^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^

.....................REALITY
˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅˅
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Yeah sure, and the devoted followers of trump believed Mexico was going to pay for their wall.

Is Barr giving internet lessons on cherry picking....
I B Hankering's Avatar
Horse shit, it’s crystal clear who has read the report and who hasn’t. The so called Freedom Caucus showed their ignorance of facts yesterday and displayed their loyalty to trump and Russia. It’s like they don’t give a damn that Russia cyber attacked this Country. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
You're a case study proving that "reading" and "comprehension" are not synonyms.

Yeah sure, and the devoted followers of trump believed Mexico was going to pay for their wall.

Is Barr giving internet lessons on cherry picking....
Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Barr underscored Mueller's findings wherein Mueller reported: “… the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference” and “... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...”
Jaxson66's Avatar
You're a case study proving that "reading" and "comprehension" are not synonyms.



Barr underscored Mueller's findings wherein Mueller reported: “… the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference” and “... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...” Originally Posted by I B Hankering
The report didn’t exonerate the fat lying bastard either. Once again you cherry pick to protect your messiah and feed the deep state conspiracy bullshit.
bambino's Avatar
The report didn’t exonerate the fat lying bastard either. Once again you cherry pick to protect your messiah and feed the deep state conspiracy bullshit. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Hey Jax, I guess you missed Pelosi’s presser today. She said there’s not enough Democrat votes to impeach Trump. Guess why? They don’t have evidence of a crime. Neither did Mueller.
I B Hankering's Avatar
The report didn’t exonerate the fat lying bastard either. Once again you cherry pick to protect your messiah and feed the deep state conspiracy bullshit. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Your notion that Trump needed to be "exonerated" when nary a single charge was leveled or prosecuted in an American court of law is intellectually flawed.

The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is the American standard; always has been.

Anyone who believes differently is the true traitor to the American way of life.
Hey Jax, I guess you missed Pelosi’s presser today. She said there’s not enough Democrat votes to impeach Trump. Guess why? They don’t have evidence of a crime. Neither did Mueller. Originally Posted by bambino
The plan is to impeach President Trump closer to the 2020 election. Evidence or no evidence. That's why Lawfare drug out the Mueller report until after the 2018 election accompanied by relentless media blitz.
Jaxson66's Avatar
Hey Jax, I guess you missed Pelosi’s presser today. She said there’s not enough Democrat votes to impeach Trump. Guess why? They don’t have evidence of a crime. Neither did Mueller. Originally Posted by bambino
So..big fucking deal. She is referring to today’s count not thirty days from now.

No evidence my ass, the bloated one can’t allow his minions to view that evidence. That’s what obstruction looks like.
bambino's Avatar
So..big fucking deal. She is referring to today’s count not thirty days from now.

No evidence my ass, the bloated one can’t allow his minions to view that evidence. That’s what obstruction looks like. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
I’ll give you credit for being tenacious. About what, I don’t know.,
I B Hankering's Avatar
So..big fucking deal. She is referring to today’s count not thirty days from now.

No evidence my ass, the bloated one can’t allow his minions to view that evidence. That’s what obstruction looks like.
Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Thirty days from now the Republicans will still be in control in the Senate. Trump's supporters understand what bloated hilebeest minions are too stupid to understand. An innocent man protesting his innocence against bogus allegations is not obstructing a damn thing.
bambino's Avatar
Thirty days from now the Republicans will still be in control in the Senate. Trump's supporters understand what bloated hilebeest minions are too stupid to understand. An innocent man protesting his innocence against bogus allegations is not obstructing a damn thing. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
We’ll soon find out the investigation was a crime.
rexdutchman's Avatar
Delusional don't understand - Insufficient Evidence , followed by Innocent till proven guilty.
Jaxson66's Avatar
We’ll soon find out the investigation was a crime. Originally Posted by bambino
Sure you will, but are you prepared for the truth. If that fat lying bastard is innocent so was OJ Simpson.
bambino's Avatar
Sure you will, but are you prepared for the truth. If that fat lying bastard is innocent so was OJ Simpson. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
Oh, I’m always prepared for the truth. You obviously are not.