Who in here would still have invaded Iraq in 2003? We know JD , LL and LustingGayAss would!

IIFFY, even though you rarely have anything meaningful to contribute ... thanks for the bump!

Bigkotex isn't thru until his wife takes the empty bottle of Chardonnay out of his dead drunk fingers, raises his forehead off the keyboard, changes his Depends, takes a model Boeing airliner out of his ass and rolls him onto a remote, tropical couch.

"Carry On!" Originally Posted by gnadfly

You're thinking of Admiral Turd Cutter

LLIdiot, are you ready to answer the "simple question" yet?

We're "still" waiting!

Yes, BigKotexLiar, let's keep this thread on the top of the forum. It shows how stupid you, WTF and the Austin Reacharound Crew are!

JCM can we get a pin to the top of the forum? Thanks!

Yes, BigKotexLiar, let's keep this thread on the top of the forum. It shows how stupid you, WTF and the Austin Reacharound Crew are!

JCM can we get a pin to the top of the forum? Thanks!

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Thanks for the bump Turdy and keep up the good work!

LLIdiot, answer the "simple" question before your smelly ol' offspring Turdfly has a friggin' heart attack!

Question of the day: Do Smelly ol' Turdflys have a heart? Or just a smelly ol' rectum?

This is the question in question... Still no answer. No guts. No class. No integrity.

NO SHIT,

This is the question in question... Still no answer. No guts. No class. No integrity.

NO SHIT, Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I am left to wonder, what in the hell does LLIdiot have to hide ... It's just a "simple" yes or no question ...

What say you, LLIdiot?

Is your answer yes or no?

He's got at least two simple questions to answer...

Two things: Your distortion is this: You, BigTits, were ONLY OPPOSED to the timing of the invasion, because you wanted some additional time for inspections, but you were not opposed to the invasion. Just the timing. What you would not say, and still not say, is how much time needed to pass for you to agree to starting the invasion. And you still have not made that commitment. So you are literally wrong when you say you were "n opposition."

Your second distortion is my position. I have repeatedly stated that given the information that was reportedly available to the decision makers of the time and the overall basis for the invasion AT THE TIME the decision to invade was the proper decision .... thus my criticism of you repeatedly of your "20-20 hindsight xray" vision, because you have repeatedly claimed you were correct there were no WMDs found.

WTF has also repeatedly stated "no WMDs were found," so we should not have conducted the invasion. Again 20-20 hindsight. WTF may have been opposed to the invasion no matter what was found afterwards. Frankly, I do not recall WTF posting on the issue in the ASPD days. If he did.

To put that in context of today's reality ... look at Iran. #1: Does Iran have a functional, deliverable nuclear warhead? #2: Does Iran have a functioning program with facilities to develop a deliverable nuclear warhead? #3: How long will it take Iran to develop a functioning, deliverable nuclear warhead.

Neither you, BigTits, nor WTF can post a link in which I stated ..

"Knowing what is known now then I would have agreed with the invasion of Iraq in 2003."

And to be extremely specific with you guys, who delete, modify, distort, and interpret what people say to make your points ... "then" was the day before the invasion began .. and "now" is May 25, 2015.

And as far as I am concerned if you all cannot produce that link, either Eccie or ASPD, you are both liars. Don't put YOUR INTERPRETATIONS ON IT or DELETE PORTIONS OF WHAT I POSTED .... and give a link that is functional.

The purpose and motivation of this thread is one: To marginalize and vilify those persons who are listed in another effort on both your parts to discredit them with, again, distortions and misrepresentations. And you do it with your assertions of "100% certainty" .... As I said, my recollection of your position, BigTits, is the correct one, and you have so acknowledged on Eccie.

Logically, had WTF been opposed to the invasion regardless of what was found AFTERWARDS, then it would not be important for him to continually argue that Bush-Cheney LIED and that no WMDs were found. He would be ON RECORD PRIOR to the invasion that he was opposed to it REGARDLESS of what Iraq may be doing or what may be found.... after the invasion.

As it relates to current events: On YOUR CURRENT ANALYSIS of Iraq, you both, BigTits and WTF, would be opposed to military action against Iran to stop its WMDs programs BEFORE they develop a functioning, deliverable weapons system. Originally Posted by LexusLover

He's got at least two simple questions to answer... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Go back to watching people drown in Austin flooding without doing anything about it.

Nope. That's not an answer. It's an explanation and a criticism of the question posed to you, you blithering idiot.

The answer is either yes or no, not hundreds of words justifying why you won't answer it.

And you should be ashamed of making light of the deaths of six innocents in a lame attempt to be glib. You are neither smart enough nor clever enough.

You're just an asshole, an the biggest taker on ECCIE.

BigTex King of the Idiots Bump!

You're NO George Zimmer, SLOBBRIN.

AND ANOTHER BUUUUUUUUUMP!

LLIdiot, quit duckin' & dodgin' and answer the "simple" question.

Q) Knowing then ... what you know now ... would you "still" support ... (your man) the Wilted Shrub ... ill fated and ill advised ... Spring of 2003 invasion ... of Iraq?

And before I forget ... MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Yeah, LL, ANSWER THE QUESTION! WHO IS THE 2016 IDIOT OF THE YEAR?