Officer yanks student out of desk, throws her a cross room.....

My point exactly. And he also might face criminal charges. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Other than calling for a "female officer" .... what do you suggest ....

... bribing the student with __________________?

Or __________________

(And before you answer, please remember the other students are watching and learning by the experience .... in other words ...... what they will get if they tell the LE to kiss their little asses.

then how come the "administration" didn't handle it? did they just take the easy path and punt it to the Police?

sounds suspiciously libtard to me. to the libtard ilk, it's always someone else's problem to solve. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

It is the howl from the right blame someone else. Call a friend maybe they will explain it to you.

Given the first comment above, the 2nd one is understandable.

Not many folks would "quite get where" you're :coming from on this"!!!!!

Other than you NOW want yet another set of laws ....

"We" already have folks wanting one set for Minorities and one for the "Majority"

Now you want one set for males and one set for females.

Does the phrase ... Equal Protection of the Law mean anything to you? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Unfortunately, it means nothing to me because it is ignored in any situation where I could benefit from it. Blacks get equal protection of the law and then some.

Fuck you racist bitches on this thread . The issue is not black or white , it's the absurdity in the amount of force used . God forbid you guys are still living during the race war . I feel sorry for you . Originally Posted by Caramel Kisses

You should feel sorry for us because we are on the losing end of the race war. We get beat over the head with race any time it is convenient for the hateful and angry left to do so. Black people have a special pass from the government they can pull out and demand satisfaction in any situation.

That is hilarious - fired for letting go of her when he threw her across the room? Originally Posted by DSK

They "partly" might have just needed an escape goat so that another Ferguson didn't happen.

You don't know much about school districts and law enforcement, do you?

School districts and the "juvenile justice system" have educated children at an early age that screaming "police brutality" will "get you off" the criminal charge, and a threat of a civil rights damage suit will get the district employee terminated or otherwise disciplined. I see you agree with that "philosophy" ...

..it really is a simple "parenting" concept. One does not reward bad behavior. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I did not say I knew about school districts and law enforcement.

I said the officer should have handled it differently because now he has been fired.

You sure like to twist what has been said.

My point exactly. And he also might face criminal charges. Originally Posted by Jackie S

I understood your point...LL is the one having trouble.

Other than calling for a "female officer" .... what do you suggest ....

... bribing the student with __________________?

Or __________________

(And before you answer, please remember the other students are watching and learning by the experience .... in other words ...... what they will get if they tell the LE to kiss their little asses. Originally Posted by LexusLover

He could have asked everyone to leave and then sat down and tried to reason with her. I know that sounds like a novel idea to you but she may have a mental condition or having a bad day or any number of things.

Or he could have done just as you support and gotten fired.

I did not say I knew about school districts and law enforcement.

I said the officer should have handled it differently because now he has been fired.



I understood your point...LL is the one having trouble. Originally Posted by WTF

Oh, yea?

So you don't know about "school districts" and "law enforcement," but you want to criticize LE on how they handle a student in the classroom when called to intervene on behalf of the school district personnel ...

.. is that sort of like you talking shit about jury selection in murder cases?

You don't know shit from Shinola on a subject, but you want to spew venom!

That's what happens when you spend too much time trying to impress Bimbos. Haven't I explained that to you? You talk shit about things of which you know nothing.

He could have asked everyone to leave and then sat down and tried to reason with her. I know that sounds like a novel idea to you but she may have a mental condition or having a bad day or any number of things.

Or he could have done just as you support and gotten fired. Originally Posted by WTF

Like I said .... you know nothing about "school districts" and LE.

For instance: Where where the other students going to go, AND WHO WAS going to supervise them while they were "gone" to this unknown location?

She obviously had a "mental condition" .... lack of respect for authority!
She obviously was "having a bad day" ..... not wanting to give up her phone!
..

"or any number of things" ... see the "obvious things" above!!!!!!!

Reasoning: Officer: "Ma'am you know you are not supposed to have a phone at the school (or using it in the classroom), and since you won't obey the rules at the school give it to me and you can get it when your parents come to the school and have a counseling session with the teacher and the assistant principal." Officer extends hand so student can place phone in his hand.

Officer extends hand so student can place phone in his hand. Originally Posted by LexusLover

To which the little bitch probably would have said........"fuck you, pig".

To which the little bitch probably would have said........"fuck you, pig". Originally Posted by Jackie S

uuhhhh ... yes, that's what they say on this board!!!!!

And when the "young lady" popped out of the womb ... she didn't!!!

Which brings me to a solution:

If the school district has a no-phone policy, then if the little turd gets caught at school with a phone the parent(s) get charged with the CRIME of allowing their child to go to school with a phone with a minimum MANDATORY FINE of $1,000 for the first offense in a school year, 3 days in jail plus $2,000 minimum for 2nd, and the 3rd offense 10 days, plus $3,000 minimum, etc.

That way the parents can fight the little turd at home for the phone ...

and let the other students who are there to learn ... continue with their education instead of them having to put their education on hold while a police officer has a "counseling session" with the little turd to explain about LIFE!

Would the female officer have gotten a ... "fuck you, sow"?

Oh, yea?

So you don't know about "school districts" and "law enforcement," but you want to criticize LE on how they handle a student in the classroom when called to intervene on behalf of the school district personnel ...

.. is that sort of like you talking shit about jury selection in murder cases?

You don't know shit from Shinola on a subject, but you want to spew venom!

. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Spew venom...All I said was that he is now fired. Had he not wanted to be fired, he should have handled it differently.

I suggested others ways it could have been handled. That is not spewing venom.

That's what happens when you spend too much time trying to impress Bimbos. Haven't I explained that to you? You talk shit about things of which you know nothing. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Who are you trying to impress...Officers of the Law?

Try being a little less hostile LL. Not everyone is out to out you. Maybe if you would try and quit hinting at outing others you'd understand that. Who are these Bimbo's you continually refer to?

If the school district has a no-phone policy, then if the little turd gets caught at school with a phone the parent(s) get charged with the CRIME of allowing their child to go to school with a phone with a minimum MANDATORY FINE of $1,000 for the first offense in a school year, 3 days in jail plus $2,000 minimum for 2nd, and the 3rd offense 10 days, plus $3,000 minimum, etc.

That way the parents can fight the little turd at home for the phone ... Originally Posted by LexusLover

I like your idea of the fine for the parents and that might/will stop a lot, but someone like this "might" just go buy a burner phone at the local convenient store or get one another way. Even then, in this case, it is too late and doesn't deal with the insubordinate student. Also, a lot of school districts are changing their policies on cell phones because of attacks on schools. At least one district in my area has changed from no phones to "please bring it but it needs to stay off and in your pocket". They get in trouble if the teacher can hear it vibrate/ring from a text or call They even informed us that it was partly because of the attacks.

Spew venom...

Maybe if you would try and quit hinting at outing others you'd understand that. Originally Posted by WTF

Yes! Spew venom. You trying to build a case, or what? Where did I


.. "HINT" at "outing others" ... ??? I don't out people. So, stuff it.

You'd rather climb a tree to tell a lie than stand on the ground and speak truth!

Do you fabricate shit in the RW OR JUST ON THE BOARD?

............ and do you do it when you start losing a discussion?

Back to your idea of emptying the classroom of students to deal with one, and some ridiculous notion of a "counseling session" by LE ...

Description of the video content: "When the officer puts his hands on her initially, she reaches up and she pops the officer with her fist," he said.

uuhhhh ... yes, that's what they say on this board!!!!!

And when the "young lady" popped out of the womb ... she didn't!!!

Which brings me to a solution:

If the school district has a no-phone policy, then if the little turd gets caught at school with a phone the parent(s) get charged with the CRIME of allowing their child to go to school with a phone with a minimum MANDATORY FINE of $1,000 for the first offense in a school year, 3 days in jail plus $2,000 minimum for 2nd, and the 3rd offense 10 days, plus $3,000 minimum, etc.

That way the parents can fight the little turd at home for the phone ...

and let the other students who are there to learn ... continue with their education instead of them having to put their education on hold while a police officer has a "counseling session" with the little turd to explain about LIFE!

Would the female officer have gotten a ... "fuck you, sow"? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Great idea for kids who want to get their parents in trouble.

I bet you think Capital punishment has prevented murders.

So LexusLover is for more State involvement and more law.

Might you be a liberal? Wanting me to bear the cost of prosecuting parents...tisk tisk.

You might want to try and understand this concept:

unintended consequences


A term used to describe a set of results that was not intended as an outcome. Though unintended consequences may be anticipated or unanticipated, they should be the product of specific actions within the process. The concept of unintended consequences is part of the Six Sigma philosophy and encompasses three types of results: positive effects, potential problems that may result in a reduction of quality, and negative effects.

Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/de...#ixzz3pz18L8MT