You're nuts if you think the US coulda, shoulda or woulda gone to war any sooner than we did in 1941.
And what are you suggesting anyway? The lesson of WW2 was appeasement doesn't work. Chamberlain's 1938 land-for-peace surrender at Munich only whetted Hitler's appetite. Yet you want to appease Putin in the same manner, trading eastern Ukraine for some ephemeral promises he will behave better in the future?
Know your history, chungy.
Originally Posted by lustylad
The problem is that China and India are buying oil from Russia.
Saudi is not increasing production.
So those three seem to be in Putin's corner.
I actually agree that Putin needs to be stopped....I'm just pointing out the difficulty.
How much will the American consumer be willing to pay to defeat Putin?
Because if they are not aware and not only aware but willing to pay more....they will vote in pro Putin politicians, like Trump.
Trumps America first means he does not care about Putin, Europe or anyone else. He will only care about lower oil prices. That means appeasing Putin.
So CT 's point may be "why wait?". Make a deal now.
CT can correct me if my assumption is wrong.
Look...I'm in agreement with you but how will Realpolitik play out.
That is my prediction. If Biden does not appease Putin and oil prices remain high...and Trump runs and he wins, he will appease Putin.
I know that is a lot of if's and ands but that is how I see this possibly playing out.