And don't cite articles ...
... cite the union bosses!
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Damn, you are a demanding ol' cus, aren't you? It seems as though you are now trying to tell me who I can and can't cite as sources. After all of these years, do you really believe I am going to start listening to you now? Why would I? Need I remind you that from the very beginning, you clearly steered me wrong on the WMD issue! And that is just one of countless examples!!!!!
Before I go any further, what exactly is a "union boss?" I looked on the AFL-CIO website and found no job title, job description or mention of anyone with a title of "union boss!" Is this an official title or designation or is it just another of your so called "terms of endearment" that you have become so famous for? Something along the lines of "Obamanible!" ROTFLMAO
What "policies" have the unions criticized? And don't cite articles ...
Originally Posted by LexusLover
You want examples? How is this for a start? Since there is no such person (or job description) who is otherwise known as a "union boss," why don't we refer to a prepared statement by the AFL-CIO, which was found on their website? Meanwhile, I long for the day when the AFL-CIO will designate an official (or unofficial) "union boss" for me to quote.
Until then......
Statement by AFL-CIO on the Proposed Colombia Trade Agreement
April 06, 2011
We are deeply disappointed that the Obama Administration has signaled that it will move forward to submit the proposed U.S.-Colombia Trade Agreement to Congress for a vote in the near future. In our view, the situation in Colombia remains unacceptably violent for trade unionists, as well as for human rights defenders and other vulnerable populations. In addition, Colombian workers face enormous and indefensible legal and practical hurdles in exercising their rights to organize unions and bargain collectively.
We appreciate the efforts of the Obama Administration to negotiate a separate Action Plan with the Colombian government to address some of the concerns we have raised over many years with respect to human and labor rights for workers, murders of trade unionists, and impunity for the perpetrators of violence. We understand that the proposed Action Plan lays out some important benchmarks in terms of increasing the level of protection for workers, addressing some flaws in the labor code, and improving enforcement of labor laws.
However, the Action Plan does not go nearly far enough in laying out concrete benchmarks for progress in the areas of violence and impunity, nor does it address many of the ways in which Colombian labor law falls short of international standards. There is no guarantee that the terms of it will in fact lead to a reduction in violence, and no backup plan to delay implementation if the violence and impunity continue. Furthermore, the Action Plan is a stand-alone agreement, not connected to the benefits conferred in the trade agreement. Once the trade agreement is ratified by Congress and implemented, the U.S. government will have no leverage whatsoever to enforce its terms in the event that the terms are not implemented as agreed.
The Colombian government has failed in enforcing the rule of law and protecting the safety of its citizens as they exercise their internationally recognized human rights to form unions and bargain collectively. These problems are deeply ingrained and longstanding, and they cannot be solved by commitments on a piece of paper. Concrete progress on the ground with respect to violence, impunity, and labor law reform needs to be demonstrated over a sustained period of time.
Colombia remains the most deadly nation in the world in which to be a trade unionist. In the past 25 years, more than 2,850 trade unionists have been murdered in Colombia. Last year alone, 51 trade unionists were murdered, an increase over 2009. Six trade unionists have been murdered so far this year, including two in the past week. The conviction rate for union murders and other violence is in the single digits, and even where prosecutions have occurred, many perpetrators have been charged in absentia and are still on the loose. Union density in Colombia is below 5 percent, and even fewer workers can exercise their right to bargain collectively. We have no doubt that if 51 CEOs had been murdered in Colombia last year, this deal would be on a very slow track indeed.
We are consulting closely with our union counterparts in Colombia and will continue to consult with the Obama administration about the terms of the Action Plan and its implementation. But, on the basis of the information provided to us at this time, we remain strongly opposed to the Colombia trade agreement.
