I am new, but not naive. I'm sure she could have got somebody to post a reply to his review on her behalf.
Originally Posted by slinmo
Well, let's see. She has her friend Joe Blow put up a post that says, "no, no, no, she doesn't do
[some acronym]." I read the thread. I think: well, so-and-so wrote the review; he was there; he's apt to know more than Joe Blow does about what Polly Provider did or did not do.
Or, Joe Blow posts, "Hey, Polly says to tell you guys that she doesn't do
[some acronym]." I think that would be seen by a moderator as Polly using Joe to circumvent the rules.
Or, if we really want to go off into lead-balloon territory, maybe Polly just starts another ECCIE account using a male name? Yeah, don't think that would end well, either.
And now, sir, if you'd like the last word, be my guest. You can be right, and I'll be wrong. What a deal!