Why Unions need to be destroyed

"Sweet Ass" IIFFY's understanding of a reputable link about America's Unions is UnionFacts.com.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Union_Facts

"Sweet Ass", where did you find those links? Breitbart?

How do you spell IDIOT? "Sweet Ass" IIFFY, of course! Originally Posted by bigtex

What do you mean when you say this? Are you dreaming in the throes of a fever or are you laboring under a madness?

What do you mean when you say this? Are you dreaming in the throes of a fever or are you laboring under a madness? Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

That's worthy of a revisit!

"Sweet Ass" IIFFY's understanding of a reputable link about America's Unions is UnionFacts.com.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Union_Facts

"Sweet Ass", where did you find those links? Breitbart?

How do you spell IDIOT? "Sweet Ass" IIFFY, of course!

Is this the product of the over active and highly prejudiced imagination that I previously referenced? If not, please provide a reputable link to the actual definition of "union boss."

Key word, reputable, not prejudiced! Originally Posted by bigtex

Reputable is a relative term, but you quoted CNN as a matter of fact in this thread you started so you must think they are reputable: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=845072&highlight=

The following is a strict site search of CNN with the term "union boss", that reveals 7,140 articles on union bosses, the same reputable source that you post from.

https://www.google.com/#q=%22union+boss%22+site:cnn.com

If after reading all 7,140 articles, if you still don't know what a union boss is, I will be glad to try and help you further in figuring it out.

From the Urban Dictionary:

"union boss isn't defined."

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...%20boss&page=4

Double Post

'Union boss' is generally a slang term used primarily by the media, usually to designate the national president of a union. Union officer however, if not specifically defined by, is referred to in legislation, notably the LMRDA which lays out regulations for the election of 'Union Officers'.

The OP advocates that "Unions need to be destroyed."

He never really explained HOW this DESTRUCTION would be accomplished?

Decertified maybe. Outlawed maybe. Improved for sure. But DESTROYED?

I suppose we must prepare for the coming of Gozer!

Not destroyed, but some changes perhaps. Personally, I look at them as being a necessary evil. Something in place to keep us from going back to the workplace of the 19th century. Not to burst anyone's bubble, but a union does not guarantee better quality in the workplace, I found that out firsthand when I worked in aerospace between my first stint in restaurants and getting into IT. What I saw is one reason I prefer to drive rather than fly if possible.

Why Unions need to be destroyed Originally Posted by therock18

Shall we return to those glorious days of yesteryear when workers had no voice against corporate America's overreach?

Yes, what a great idea!

Not destroyed, but some changes perhaps. Originally Posted by chefnerd

I can live with positive changes in all aspects of American society. We all could and should get better, including our unions.

But to destroy America's Unions, you've got to be kidding?