Tiny: With full respect for you and your choice I say . .
.I think that you missed my point entirely. I was trying to encourage voters to cast their ballots based not on the relative merits of Biden or Trump, as neither one is a man I would hold up as a role model of manhood to my grand son. Rather, I was suggesting that a voter look at what the Democrats seem to stand for this time around.
In my view, bone of the Democratic presidents since 1932 would have endorsed any part of the party platform this year. I think the activities of Antifa and Black Lives Matter would also have been opposed by most Democratic politicians from President Roosevelt up through President Clinton. The support for the anarchist chaos given by state and local Democratic officials, passive and active, would never be endorsed or encouraged by any Democrat prior to Clinton either.
My point is, do not vote for or against either man, but instead make your choices based on the overall actions or inactions of the Democratic Party overall.
Originally Posted by ICU 812
ICU, I actually didn't misunderstand, and have replied to your point in other threads. I was being a little sarcastic, sorry for that.
Replying to the above and your OP, I disagree with some of your statements. Jimmy Carter is and George McGovern would be very comfortable with Joe Biden as president. People like Angela Davis, Stokley Carmichael, H. Rap Brown, Bobby Seal, and Abby Hoffman have not taken over the Democratic Party. I'm not at all worried about anarchy or marauding hoards if Democrats win. That said, I do not live in Houston like you. My locality is run by Republicans politicians. I do think the Republican Party does a better job of running things at the local and state level. It's the party of businessmen. The Democratic Party is the party of the Plaintiff's lawyers, who are good at suing people and not much else.
My main concern though is economics. I hinted at this in a couple of replies to SpeedRacer earlier in this thread, that no one probably read because they were technical. But Biden and Democratic Congressmen and women want to increase the size of government. They want the USA to be like, say, France. Government spending as a % of GDP in the USA is 35%, compared to 55% in France. And largely as a result, GDP per capita in France is 28% lower than the USA. I don't want us to go there, that is, to become poorer.
I don't think Biden would take us all the way there, certainly not in 4 years. His proposals according to independent analysts would increase government spending by about 4% or 5% of GDP. But Kamala Harris and the up and coming Democrats like Warren and AOC would take us there and further. I do not believe their policies would result in the USA becoming another Venezuela. But Argentina would be a strong possibility.