Is this Obama's "Eisenhower Moment?"

Don't have much of substance to post, do you? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Bigkotex can post its similarities to Nixon's "Checker's Speech." Originally Posted by gnadfly

I see the two Lovebirds were roosting together again last night.

I'm late to this ball game but I see one very important distinction between Eisenhower and Obama Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

And they brought along Turdfly's Idiot cousin to play 'em a tune.

How romantic!

What would those be, pray tell, Simple Jack?

How do I know that you're not JL/Marshall/Jane/IBIdiot/Rocky?

How does anybody?

Spell check, dipshits. I couldn't find Ynssap anywhere. Even in a mirror.

And get over it, Whiny, he ain't Jewish. He's probably RWW cultist who thinks he's Jesus. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

There is no doubt that Hanoi COG's ATF "Sweet Ass" IIFFY is not Marshy.

Marshy is smarter than "Sweet Ass", the Idiot Twins (IB & JD) as well as their offspring, the Moron named Turdfly. Probably collectively!

With all of that said, even Marshy is dumber than a box of rocks! You guessed it, that is a very low threshold! Originally Posted by bigtex

Good point BT. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I see the two Lovebirds were roosting together again last night.
Originally Posted by bigtex

. . .

Another conversation far above the cranial ceiling of our resident shit-smearer.

Dumber than a bag of hammers, IBIdiot, ain't cha?

How romantic! Originally Posted by bigtex

Still no substance to post.

Because Clinton did it ... Bill ... that is.

Remember? The "factory" .... milk that is. The thought of milk reminded me ...


Why does "Russian" come to mind? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Is that like the folding last page in Mad Magazine? You know, the one where the image changes to something different? Perhaps if one mushes the two together we see something else. Although, under (under, get it ) I might not be looking at the tat, but at the naughty bits on either side.

Still no substance to post. Originally Posted by LexusLover

That's rich! The master of lies, bullshit and deception is desperately searching for a substantive post.

I suppose he is wanting to read one because he knows he is incapable of producing a substantive post on his own.

Earth to LexiLiar, if substantive is what you're looking for, don't read your own posts. If you do, I promise you will soon be disappointed.

You probably should refrain from reading the posts of the Turdfly roosting on your perch, as well. His posts are even less substantive than your garbage!

That's rich, the master of lies, bullshit and deception is desperately searching for a substantive post. Originally Posted by bigtex

Still no substance I see. You almost as bad as Obaminable on deflecting ...


.. what did he say overseas ...? He didn't draw the red line?

He's sinking quickly ... so are you, BT. Did you start this thread?

Still no substance I see. You almost as bad as Obaminable on deflecting ...


.. what did he say overseas ...? He didn't draw the red line?

He's sinking quickly ... so are you, BT. Did you start this thread? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Still searching for a substantive post?

Try on this "substantive post" for size!: MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Truth hurts, doesn't it LexiLiar?

As for Obama sinking, give me a shout when his approvals dip down into "the most unpopular (and incompetent) President in modern history'" (Dubya's) category. You know the category I am speaking of, it is more commonly referred to as the mid 20's.

We can talk about it then!

As for Obama sinking, give me a shout when his approvals dip down into "the most unpopular (and incompetent) President in modern history'" (Dubya's) category. You know the category I am speaking of, it is more commonly referred to as the mid 20's.

We can talk about it then! Originally Posted by bigtex

In the meantime, you'll just post nonsubstantive remarks in order to divert attention away ..

.. from the topic ... the incompetence of the ones for whom you voted ...


Obaminable and Carrie.

In the meantime, you'll just post nonsubstantive remarks in order to divert attention away ..

.. from the topic ... the incompetence of the ones for whom you voted ...


Obaminable and Carrie. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I can say with 100 percent certainty that I have never voted for anyone with the last name of either "Obaminable" or "Carrie."

As it relates to me voting for "incompetence." It wasn't me who voted for the individual who earned the title of "The most unpopular (and incompetent) President in modern US history."

Shall I provide the link?

On the other hand, you not only voted for the individual who would become "the most unpopular President in modern US history," (George W. Bush). You did so at least 4 times!

How dumb was that?

I can say with 100 percent certainty that I have never voted for anyone with the last name of either "Obaminable" or "Carrie." Originally Posted by bigtex

A stickler for factually correct statements I see...

.............................. .least you be judged by your own standards.

And you know how I voted on any given election how?

And you know how I voted on any given election how? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Well, tell us yourself. Did you or did you not vote for George W. Bush? It is a simple question!

As for me personally, I can truthfully say that I have never voted for GWB for US Congress, Texas Governor or POTUS. To take it a step further, I never will! LL, can you truthfully make that same statement? Or are you ashamed to admit that you actually voted for the individual who was soon to become "the most unpopular President in modern US history."

I anxiously await your response!

Is TEX still telling that lie? He knows better but maybe he is suffering from senility.

Is LexiLiar still telling that lie? He knows better but maybe he is suffering from senility. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Fixed it for you, no charge!

To answer your questions in the order asked:

Yes, LL is "still telling that lie." Why do you think he is named LexiLiar? Duh!

Yes, LL has a tendency to forget things! Thus, there is a high probability that he is "suffering from senility."

Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

Yes, LL has a tendency to forget things! Thus, there is a high probability that he is "suffering from senility."

Thanks for pointing out the obvious. Originally Posted by bigtex

Yea, which is why I thought I recalled you having taken an unscheduled swim in the Canal, before you bought a new Mustang ... am I at least "close"?