Your principle carried forward would mean that you don't read reviews because you wouldn't rely on them. Nor do you write reviews because you don't want others to rely on them. After all, we should all "think for ourselves." But hold on, that would mean this board serves no purpose, and that only after a session commences will we be able to determine whether we're getting value for our money. Uh-uh, I don't buy it.
Originally Posted by ShysterJon
"Carried forward" = exaggerated to an extreme strawman? Nice rhetorical trick, and I also indulge myself occasionally, but not all slopes are slippery.
I imagine you understand my real position, but for those who don't:
Yes, reviews are valuable, to the extent they provide accurate
information. Often, their value isn't very high, because most people don't do it well and the result is more about bragging (or providing a masturbatory fantasy) than providing information. But they have value and certainly shouldn't be done away with.
No, I don't think a review that simply expresses an opinion or conclusion -- "Best I've ever had! You should absolutely see her!" have even that much value. WALDT, and I've found at most one or two guys whose preferences are close enough to mine that I would see someone based simply on his recommendation without more.
But the focus of my ridicule had two specific qualifications. First, by guys who hadn't even seen the lady in question. So, when they haven't experienced the service, what value is their evaluation? Second, abount what they would pay for a given service. Since the "how much I'm willing to pay" decision depends not only on the WALDT question but also budget and a host of other factors, what value does that provide? Would it be
useful for me to proclaim that I'm not willing to pay as much for wine as TTH does, or for a sugarbaby experience as you do? Your and his descriptions of the experience may be helpful to others, but would anyone really decide how much they would pay for that based on my opinion? God, I hope not.
Want to discuss rates? Have at it, although too often it is done in a gratuitously cruel or misogynistic way, and that's not necessary. But I find amusing, if not ridiculous, the inevitable responses (and I don't mean yours, SJ) to threads like this that claim such comments are valuable
information. They're an opportunity to vent, perhaps reassurance from seeing that other people have similar values (although a confident person wouldn't attach that much weight to others' opinions), maybe even a way to try to pressure the ladies into lowering their fees (foolish, because it's the level of their business rather than rhetoric by a few guys on a SJMB that will influence that; I've never seen such comments have any effect). Maybe it's just some way to pass the time. *shrug* But let's not overstate how important and valuable they are. Yet some people have an over-inflated sense of the contributions they make by those comments.