New Screening Requirements. Guess its time for me to retire!

This thread seems to keep getting replies, as it keeps getting bumped back to the top of the list. I'm not even sure why this is an issue at all. If some person asks me for info I'm not keen to provide, then they will be met with silence, and if they are particularly insistent on extracting the info from me, they will probably be told to take a hike at minimum.


If the info a provider is asking you for makes you apprehensive, then go look for another provider. One and done. I assure you, of the tens of millions of SW active all over the world at any given moment, not all of them will have identical protocol when it comes to the info they want from prospective customers.


I'm not going to get into too many details.... but within the last month I sent a message through a site to a delicious Hispanic woman in her late '20s. I mentioned that I'm aware short notice is not easy to accommodate, but asked her if she might be available for an appointment in about 6 hours or so from the time I was contacting her. She responded with glee, stating another client had just cancelled on her for essentially the same time slot, and would be thrilled to see me. She was able to view whatever info she felt like she needed through the site I contacted her on, and did not ask me to provide anything else other than the address of the hotel I was staying at, that's all. Didn't ask to see my ID, and didn't ask for my last name, and neither of those were visible on the site.


I didn't have a problem. She didn't call my hotel room land line, ask me what I looked like, or engage in any other behavior that felt like she was invading my privacy. And honestly, combined with everything else that happened between the afternoon before I saw her, and the afternoon of the next day, I wouldn't trade that entire 24 hour experience for anything - well, not anything I can think of at this point in my life. And NO I will NOT write a review about this woman; that's like sharing the location of a secret gold mine.


Just look for another girl who isn't as invasive, that's it. If there aren't any other girls up to your standards in your area, then travel to another city. And if you can't find one, well, sorry, I don't have any other advice to give you. I guess you could buy a love doll as an alternative; no screening required and an open key, pure cash transaction. That's about all I can say. Pangolier over and out.

I agree, I got super lucky and asked through PM to arrange for a meeting with a young lady and she asked just minimal non invasive questions and used mostly my contributions to the site as screening material. I have since seen her 6 times and 5 have been overnight. No way in hell will I review because of our special arrangement but point is quality providers are out there without a lot of unnecessary BS.
However, no need to bash a provider for asking anything she wants for her screening. If it doesnt fit your style then politely decline and look somewhere else. There is no reason to be anything other than nice. That's my .02 cents.

This thread seems to keep getting replies, as it keeps getting bumped back to the top of the list. I'm not even sure why this is an issue at all. If some person asks me for info I'm not keen to provide, then they will be met with silence, and if they are particularly insistent on extracting the info from me, they will probably be told to take a hike at minimum.


If the info a provider is asking you for makes you apprehensive, then go look for another provider. One and done. I assure you, of the tens of millions of SW active all over the world at any given moment, not all of them will have identical protocol when it comes to the info they want from prospective customers.


I'm not going to get into too many details.... but within the last month I sent a message through a site to a delicious Hispanic woman in her late '20s. I mentioned that I'm aware short notice is not easy to accommodate, but asked her if she might be available for an appointment in about 6 hours or so from the time I was contacting her. She responded with glee, stating another client had just cancelled on her for essentially the same time slot, and would be thrilled to see me. She was able to view whatever info she felt like she needed through the site I contacted her on, and did not ask me to provide anything else other than the address of the hotel I was staying at, that's all. Didn't ask to see my ID, and didn't ask for my last name, and neither of those were visible on the site.


I didn't have a problem. She didn't call my hotel room land line, ask me what I looked like, or engage in any other behavior that felt like she was invading my privacy. And honestly, combined with everything else that happened between the afternoon before I saw her, and the afternoon of the next day, I wouldn't trade that entire 24 hour experience for anything - well, not anything I can think of at this point in my life. And NO I will NOT write a review about this woman; that's like sharing the location of a secret gold mine.


Just look for another girl who isn't as invasive, that's it. If there aren't any other girls up to your standards in your area, then travel to another city. And if you can't find one, well, sorry, I don't have any other advice to give you. I guess you could buy a love doll as an alternative; no screening required and an open key, pure cash transaction. That's about all I can say. Pangolier over and out. Originally Posted by Pangolier

Meeting with someone who don't screen is just as unsafe

Meeting with someone who don't screen is just as unsafe Originally Posted by LustyBustyGina38FF

Exactly
And, why do some think that screening requirements are new?
I remember bar meets before internet.

Actually it goes farther back then that. Anybody remember Usenet Newsgroups? They were the original internet bulletin board. There was an alternative discussion area there that was open to all venues. The one mentioned above was "alt.sex.prostitution.discussi on" hence the abbreviation ASPD. When bandwidth increased in availability and websites became the norm ASPD moved from usenet to it's own website. Unfortunately the original founder of the site (she was from Houston) passed away many years ago. Now those were the OLD days! Originally Posted by fly

And what does 'ECCIE' stand for?

Sounds like she doesn’t want to catch a case.. but I guess the guys like taking those chances these days lol every girl has their own protocol. My clients like that I screen which I love. To each it’s own.. good luck

And what does 'ECCIE' stand for? Originally Posted by RetiredSubmariner

Escort Client Community Information Exchange

Hey, let's exchange each other's RW name and whatnot.

Oh, wait...you ladies don't want to do THAT?? Oh, dang.

Why not??

When providers stop getting raped, robbed and murdered maybe they can lighten up the screening requirements. Until then either retire like you said (best bet) or find someone who doesn't screen. It's hilarious to me that "hobbyists" bitch and complain about one particular girls requirements instead of just finding someone that requires less info. There are literally a million other women out there yet you want to scrutinize one?

The fact you balk at her requirements is exactly the kind of person she doesn't want to see. This makes screening really easy. Red flags all over..

Most providers spend time working on their websites, web presence, having positive reviews and have plenty of information online for you to decide on BEFORE you see them...we have nothing to go on but your name and information to tell us that you're not a crazy psychopath..you have no right to tell someone else what should make them feel comfortable.

It's definitely time for you to retire.

PS. Providers are getting hurt alot more often then clients getting outed. Let's be real and cut the bullshit.

True.

Most providers spend time working on their websites, web presence, having positive reviews and have plenty of information online for you to decide on BEFORE you see them... Originally Posted by NaughtyMaddy

Screening is obviously necessary for escorts. I would be very concerned if no screening was used by an escort. Usually 2 or 3 references from other escorts that know you are sufficient so no personal info is required.

Her screening requirements are exactly the same that us providers are subjected to earn the “verified” status. Same requirements for Eccie, Private Delights, P411, Tryst and I’m not sure on OH2

No we will not. And we don't need to. You literally just missed the point Phoenixx who posted right above you clearly got across. To be accepted on the more well-regarded advertising venues like Slixa, Private Delights, Preferred 411, etc we already had to submit our drivers license over and over and hence, we're already verified. Even here on ECCIE if a companion didn't already have a long track record before SESTA/FOSTA, she has to send an ID to become verified.

Furthermore, for some of us companions who are now getting into making content for sites like OnlyFans or Many Vids, we have to submit not just our drivers licenses but our SSN as well.

You can't have it both ways. If you want to visit verified companions you have to prove that seeing you will not pose a risk to them. If you wan't to see those who are unverified so you can attempt to get away with providing as little screening information as possible, that's your choice. Originally Posted by Lena Duvall

I agree with the fact you are giving your information to those sites and you have every right to expect a client to give what you request for your screening.

But please do not expect me to agree that if you are requesting our real world info we do not have the right to request also. We are walking into the same unknown as you. Just because a site knows your a real person, who cares? They do not share that info with us. You want my info and license and job info to feel safe. Sure!! But I've been robbed at the meet before. Pony up yours also. You don't get your cake and eat it too.

https://privatedelights.ch/USA/Calif...naPrincesaxx22

Is this where the hobby is at? The screening requirements for this lady are unreal. Anyone else seen requirements like this?

Screening Requirements:

If you would like to meet me, please Text or Email:

1. First and last name.

2. Photo i.d. You can hide any information except your face and full name.

3. Sticky note with today's date. Please use the sticky note to hide your information except your face and full name.

SMH. I am all for screening requirements and everyone feeling comfortable, but this is taking it to a new level. If this is what the hobby has come to, guess its time for me to retire. Originally Posted by Fizley

If anyone thinks LE does not have an ID with a picture that the code, id number and address can be covered and have a sticky note near by with a pen to write something on it
BULLY FOR YOU!
The ONLY way right now to ensure no one gets in trouble is if the hobbier sends a deposit of any amount it could be as low as $25 bucks for her showing you to work twitter/ or any other website help in computer guidance.. NOTHING ELSE! Then when she is looking over your shoulder to learn or show you how to work said site and as her left boob accidently on purpose touches your left shoulder and sparks fly and xxxx happens because the 2 of you are consenting adults and you lay $$ or $$$ out on the table just to help her pay her hotel, rent car, air, rent, phone etc. etc. etc.
NOT ONE WORD SPOKEN about what she expects not one word what you will pay.. THAT Is the only way you are completely safe on both parties.....And well in a perfect world women could wait after to get the proper gift and men would get everything they think they should get for that...
We do not live in a perfect world. BUT as far as safety LE CAN NOT SEND YOU MONEY AHEAD OF TIME... FOR NOW....! Any Amount! just fyi and if the new rules do ever come to pass they can not send money for a computer tutor session..JS
Currently I can show people how to work my site my hands teach very well on the key board...LOL HA HA HA

Due to my job in the entertainment industry, I will be screening HARD. I will not be showing my face nor sending face pics EVER. I learned my lesson from years of F ups and involving myself in situations that could've been prevented if I had screened properly. If a gentleman doesn't want to be screened and wants to haggle my donations, NEXT! I do understand how gents feel about this one, but we screen for a reason. No one wants to be outed, hurt or killed. I was drugged back in 2007 by a client and almost got outted by one a few years ago. Another tried to stab me so guess what? I'm screening properly, no one gets a free pass with me. And if a gentleman wishes to not see me because of this, then that's fine. No hard feelings.

Many do not want to be screened because they were blacklisted due to bad things they did or have something more sinister to hide. I care about the safety and well-being of my family, friends, and clients. If I don't screen and let my business become a free-for-all, then I have no business being a provider.