Not about censorship at all. The press is free, but no press is required to publish YOUR content. You are free to start your own press and publish what you wish.
What I am saying is that for example, prosecutors are building a case against a capital invader who you agreed should be prosecuted, and discover that he/she is a frequent poster on this thread that advocates extreme measures and hatred. Maybe they decide to investigate other posters that agree with extreme views? Maybe they decide to investigate the whole site and it's ownership, perhaps using it's hobby orientation as an excuse?
If I owned this site I wouldn't chance the exposure and would limit to primary site subject at hand. Hobby might even be legalized under Biden.
Ellen- ALL those that entered the capital were complicit and should be prosecuted. Like saying I was part of the gang that invaded your home, but didn't take anything.
Finally, I'm very aware of the 4th dimension. I'm also very aware of the 5th Dimension. Marilyn McCoo was hot.
Originally Posted by reddog1951
Comment - no One forces any poster to post here, read here, or remain here on this site, and/or in this forum.
If poster 'r' is afraid that another posters opinions may cause issues for the Site - "he/she is a frequent poster on this thread that advocates extreme measures and hatred. Maybe they decide to investigate other posters that agree with extreme views? Maybe they decide to investigate the whole site and it's ownership, perhaps using it's hobby orientation as an excuse?" - poster 'r' has options to take in support of poster 'r' and his point of view.
It is clear that poster 'r' and other posters - find teh referred to opinions objectionable.
Question - if poster of which 'r' defines as 'advocating "extreme measures and hatred" -will cause 'they' to 'investigate the whole site and its' ownership" - I would ask what is poster 'r' afraid of???
Does poser 'r' fear shutdown of other parts of this site due to an investigation 'they' initiate from political discussions on this forum?
Evidently So.
Poster 'r' - please further define 'they' of whom there is fear.
Would poster 'r', or others , please show the quotes of 'extreme measures and hatred".
would poster 'r' please define what poster 'r' regards as" extreme measures and hatred".
Would poster 'r' please define why such opinions of 'extreme measures and hatred" would cause an investigation by an unknown 'they" - and what consequences poster 'r' fears.
Would poster 'r' please define why such posts are in contravention of teh first Amendment , and the rules of the Forum
Would Poster 'r' please define why such posts are a valid reason for action against the poster whose posts poster 'r' and other find objectionable.
Would poser 'r' please define why such 'objectionable posts' - are 'objectionable ' to poster 'r' and other posters of like mind?
'r' - there is yet a First Amendment - and political discussions are legal in
America - even Conservative points of view.
I see No One advocating illegal acts, or 'crying fire in teh movie theater"!
Is this post below an example of what may be 'objectionable opinions " - characterized by complaining poster(s) as 'hate and spam", including 'extreme measures and hatred"?
Please remember that Donald J Trump defeated H.... in teh Presidential election of 2016.
The DPST/cp party, its minion LSM - have made every effort to persecute,impede, and destroy President Donald J Trump since that moment. They have even impeached and started a trial of a the departed from office President Donald j Trump - after their senile . corrupt POTUS fiden 'won' an election characterized by many , many allegations of voter fraud ( an area of expertise for the DPST/ccp party).
I have yet to see any 'evidence" of the accusations nazi Pelosi forwarded - and to my knowledge - there is no evidence of any kind included in teh Articles of Impeachment forwarded to the Senate by nazi Pelosi. President Trump was Impeached with no hearings ( not even giving schiff and nadler a chance to lie on the world stage again) , no evidence presented, and a disgraceful, UnConstitutional peformance by nazi Pelosi as speaker of teh house- which has made our system of rule of law under teh Constitution a laughingstock to Xi, Putin, and the world.
An Impeachment trial of a departed POTUS is such a ridiculous concept as to be entertained only by those truly blinded by personal hatred of former President Donald J Trump.
Speaker nazi Pelosi has made her, and her parties' hatred of teh former President clear, and their rage at the defeat of their lying. hag of a candidate in 2016.
Speaker nazi Pelosi is about hatred and revenge for the DPST/ccp party election loss in 2016 - Pure and Simple.
End of example.
I strongly suspect that poster 'r' - and others in this thread - are using the terms 'hate and spam' to try to force a removal of a poster whose opinion opinions they find objectionable , and possibly offensive - as such - an example of possible said opinions is presented above.
Is the opinion presented above regarding teh DPST/ccp party and its hatred of former President Donald J Trump, and desire for revenge, qualify as 'extreme measures, hatred, and spam" - and a reason to remove a poster from the site?
Is such opinion a reason to expect 'investigation" from an unknown, undefined, 'they"???
And how , or why, would such as 'they' find such opinions, and classify such opinions as a reason to Investigate" the site and forum?
What danger to the national structure is posed by such opinions, to cause investigation and intervention by the unknown, undefined 'they"?
Are such opinions not protected under the First Amendment - and teh Rules of teh Forum - as presented?
Or, are those poster(s) in such fear of opinions other than their own, that they behave as did nazi pelosi in her desire for revenge on former President Donald J Trump - and advocate for removal of a poster whose opinions are objectionable to the complaining poster(s)?
Finally 'r' - and other posters - when complaining about 'hate' - I would remind teh poster(s) that the DPST/ccp politician AOC advocates "re-education camps for reprogramming of Conservatives". Parenthetically - those of my 'ilk'.
The AOC ( a leader of teh DPST/ccp party) concept is reminiscent of teh Holocaust - and a concept which is anathema to all Conservatives/republicans everywhere!
Is that not a 'hateful" concept towards those of a different political opinion?
If NOT- then please define "What Is".
A final thought - "And when they came for me, there was no One to speak for me"!
Thank you - valued poster(s)
If teh Moderator choose to shut down this thread - I am not in opposition to the decision.