since we can not comment on our reviews

Not a good idea because it will lead to providers saying, he had a big cock or a small cock etc and then other hobbyist would shy away least they find out that they couldnt satisfy her after reading that the other guy did. This is the fastest way for your business to go up in smoke Originally Posted by macbeth1000

i don't think so, because most girls still have to keep it classy for the other clients, but it would make it easier in terms of refrences, you can just look up their reviews


I think i'm going to look into making a site for reviewing clients from established boards.

The problem with doing reviews on the men is Discretion, I'm not sure many guys would want to see a lady if she is doing reviews on them. You can write about visits in a blog and be discreet of their identity.

I think the "hobbiest review" would be more about what the provider expects. You show up on time, clean, fresh breath, bring the agreed amount of money, don't haggle (the agreed price vs menu at time appointment was set) if you want extras not previously discussed be prepared to pay extra for them. That kind of stuff. No ROS unless there is a problem like falling asleep during the deed or at the end and running over time.

No crap like:
Saw Remote and his handle should be needle dick the bug raper.
Saw Remote well a little of him.
Saw Remote so old he was around when dirt was in R&D.
Saw Remote so old his cum was dust.
Saw Remote only muscle still working was his tongue.
Saw Remote paid in $1 bills said he was used to seeing strippers.
Saw Remote when he arrived his motorcycle set off every car alarm in the parking lot, but no bells for me.
Saw Remote "When I told him he was out of shape," he said "Round is a shape."

Post like this would be unacceptable and require a large discount on the next visit.

Remote

i don't think so, because most girls still have to keep it classy for the other clients, but it would make it easier in terms of refrences, you can just look up their reviews


I think i'm going to look into making a site for reviewing clients from established boards. Originally Posted by Wulf_Princess

I can only imagine how your reviews would read if the client is on your bad side, this idea although noble is a very bad one and you think a busy provider is going to take time to write a review, not everyone is as out spoken and quick to ignite like you Cj.

The problem with doing reviews on the men is Discretion, I'm not sure many guys would want to see a lady if she is doing reviews on them. You can write about visits in a blog and be discreet of their identity. Originally Posted by Sami

Write whatever you want about me. As long as it is true.

If your going to lie about me at least say I was average size or Ok in bed.

I'll admit I'm not good at this Sex thing. I've bee practicing for many years and plan to keep at it until I get it right.

Hobbist reviews would keep some people on their best behavior. It would also encourage honesty, because based on some reviews alot of you providers cum a dozen times in 1 hour all Adonis has to do is wink at you, and your knees buckle, you swoon and cum all at the same time. If he so much as breathes on your clit you climb the walls and hang from the ceiling in rapture. I know from reading these reviews I'm a poor lover. My several decades of practice do not include any women that came more than 2 possibly 3 time in an hour.

I still like the idea of providers being able to review hobbiest.

I can only imagine how your reviews would read if the client is on your bad side, this idea although noble is a very bad one and you think a busy provider is going to take time to write a review, not everyone is as out spoken and quick to ignite like you Cj. Originally Posted by macbeth1000

I would say a lot of Hobbiest don't write reviews either. I only write reviews on ladies that are looking for more visits. If they ask me not to tell anyone about what we did I respect that and don't review.

But then again I mainly do the strip club sceen. So the reviews bring them more hobbiest looking for extras and willing to pay. If they don't preform up to agreement or standards I don't write a review because after all it's a strip club. Hunting is part of the thrill.

I think the "hobbiest review" would be more about what the provider expects. You show up on time, clean, fresh breath, bring the agreed amount of money, don't haggle (the agreed price vs menu at time appointment was set) if you want extras not previously discussed be prepared to pay extra for them. That kind of stuff. No ROS unless there is a problem like falling asleep during the deed or at the end and running over time.

No crap like:
Saw Remote and his handle should be needle dick the bug raper.
Saw Remote well a little of him.
Saw Remote so old he was around when dirt was in R&D.
Saw Remote so old his cum was dust.
Saw Remote only muscle still working was his tongue.
Saw Remote paid in $1 bills said he was used to seeing strippers.
Saw Remote when he arrived his motorcycle set off every car alarm in the parking lot, but no bells for me.
Saw Remote "When I told him he was out of shape," he said "Round is a shape."

Post like this would be unacceptable and require a large discount on the next visit.

Remote Originally Posted by Remote

You should pay in pennies (bring a jar and count them out one by one). That shit would be hilarious!

Your original post made me laugh. Thanks!

i don't think so, because most girls still have to keep it classy for the other clients, but it would make it easier in terms of refrences, you can just look up their reviews


I think i'm going to look into making a site for reviewing clients from established boards. Originally Posted by Wulf_Princess

I like that idea providers could track Hobbiest and see their "record" No Shows, Alerts, ect. As long as hurtful remarks weren't alowed like: Couldn't get me off if I standing on the edge of cliff ready to jump and he was pushing."

Hobbiest would want to look at their own reviews so the would know what the providers were saying and they could improve on perfarmance or dispute remarks. Such as Yes I was a No Show but I called an hour before and explained that my boss left for the day and fergot to unchain me from my desk, or Yes I was a No Show because I bailed. When I arrived I saw her getting out of a pimpmoble and hiding a 9mm where I had planned on planting my 6mm, or I bailed without paying because this new pretty youg girl had a dick bigger than mine!

Maybe if providers could post on their own reviews it would be a good comprimse. Hobbist post: We agreed on anal but during the sesion she refused.
Provider post: We did agree on anal but he showed up the a dick bigger than a horse and I had to say no because I planned to use that hole for the rest of my life. I did not give him a discount because he did not warn me that his friens call him Tripod for obvious reason.

You should pay in pennies (bring a jar and count them out one by one). That shit would be hilarious!

Your original post made me laugh. Thanks! Originally Posted by SD2011

Your Welcome, glad I could brighten your day.

If you are paying me then go ahead and write a review about my skills oh wait ladies are not paying us unless it's her pimp so why in the hell should we hobbyist be reviewed. Ijs

Carry on with the belly aching threAD

If you are paying me then go ahead and write a review about my skills oh wait ladies are not paying us unless it's her pimp so why in the hell should we hobbyist be reviewed. Ijs

Carry on with the belly aching threAD Originally Posted by Thatdude

He makes a valid point.

I still like the idea. It would be great to finally read more truth than fiction in reviews.

Recommendation: FUCK NO WAY!!!!!!! TELL HIM TO TAKE A HIKE!

If CJ starts such a site, would she start calling people obnoxious? I think she used that on me. I am all down for such a site, and if she is allowing outcalls, I dont mind being reviewed by CJ for another visit, if she drops the term "obnoxious"

If you are paying me then go ahead and write a review about my skills oh wait ladies are not paying us unless it's her pimp so why in the hell should we hobbyist be reviewed. Ijs

Carry on with the belly aching threAD Originally Posted by Thatdude

You do not evaluate your clients at work? Do they pay there invoices in full or they on time. Do they change spec in the middle of the job?

You do not evaluate your clients at work? Do they pay there invoices in full or they on time. Do they change spec in the middle of the job? Originally Posted by Remote

What exactly are your trying to say, this whole statement made Zero sense