Supreme Court Nominee

  • DSK
  • 03-17-2016, 09:28 AM
Republicans are fueling the Trump campaign by their silly, partisan behavior. One could argue that under McConnell and Boehner, the GOP created the Trump campaign.

Just St wait until The Drumpf nominates one of the Kardashians.... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
The Kardashians are too fucking liberal - I hope Mr Trump doesn't nominate one of them.

You are an anti-Semite for not supporting Garland, by the way.
bambino's Avatar
They aren't representing their constituents, Lambino... majority (58% according to a news poll) says the Senate SHOULD open up hearings on the nominee.

"Let the people decide...?" Yertle and Repubes don't give a FUCK what the people decide...

And Bitch McConnell actually says it doesn't matter if the Pres. is a Repube or a Demagogue.., we should wait...
BULLSHIT. Originally Posted by Prolongus
Now Prolapseanus, why so angry? Is this really a big deal? 7 months? The country has functioned without 9 justices for longer periods of time. Garland will not be confirmed. Even he knows it. Get over it.
The cat is out of the bag, so to speak.

He is anti 2d Amendment. Period. He is one of thos "moderates" that thinks the Right to keep and bear arms is about duck hunting.

Fuck him. He can sit in his Ivory Tower, and converse with his other compatriots in academia, and discuss among themselves how they, as the ruling class, know what's best for all of us "serfs" toiling in the fields.

This nomination is about one thing, period. The 2d Amendment. Not abortion, not dipshits refusing to cook a cake for a couple of old queens who want to get married, or any other asinine social grievances that need to be rectified.

It's about the Bill of Rights.
Show him the door.
18 months is a long time to block a nomination. Shame on Schumer. Originally Posted by DSK
What's the difference between blocking it for 8 months and 18 months? What is the arbitrary amount of time it is okay to block a nomination? I'm curious. It seems to me that the arguments being put forth allow for blocking of nomination until the next election whenever a seat opens up, which could be 4 years.
I B Hankering's Avatar
What's the difference between blocking it for 8 months and 18 months? What is the arbitrary amount of time it is okay to block a nomination? I'm curious. It seems to me that the arguments being put forth allow for blocking of nomination until the next election whenever a seat opens up, which could be 4 years. Originally Posted by eatfibo
Because your ilk are pathetically making an issue out 8 months, eatbibeau, when your ilk was hypocritically pushing to block appointments for 18 months.
Because your ilk are pathetically making an issue out 8 months, eatbibeau, when your ilk was hypocritically pushing to block appointments for 18 months.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
What will your ilk do if Hillary is elected, and nominates a real liberal???
I B Hankering's Avatar
What will your ilk do if Hillary is elected, and nominates a real liberal??? Originally Posted by i'va biggen
The Senate isn't required to confirm any of the dildos a dim-retard might nominate, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
The Senate isn't required to confirm any of the dildos a dim-retard might nominate, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
How do you know republicans will be in charge dildo breath? They may go down with Trump.
bambino's Avatar
How do you know republicans will be in charge dildo breath? They may go down with Trump. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
And Hillary might be indicted.
I B Hankering's Avatar
How do you know republicans will be in charge dildo breath? They may go down with Trump. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
The Republicans are currently in charge, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and will be until at least next January, you ridiculously moronic jackass. Regardless of what happens in the election, the Republicans still have a lame-duck session before any new president takes office, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. In the event the Republicans do capture additional Senate seats, they can damn well tell a dim-retard president to take his nominees and go to hell, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.


And Hillary might be indicted. Originally Posted by bambino
+1

"[C]urrently [Hildabeast has a FBI investigation and] at least 38 lawsuits, including one filed by The Associated Press."
Now Prolapseanus, why so angry? Is this really a big deal? 7 months? The country has functioned without 9 justices for longer periods of time. Garland will not be confirmed. Even he knows it. Get over it. Originally Posted by bambino
Angry? A little, Bambi. More like sick and tired of these congress welfare fucks serving decades and doing 20 minutes of actual work, all paid for with our tax dollars. That, and smiling while getting lobbyist cash up their ass, globe-trotting, "fact-finding" junkets to see who comes back with the better tan...and they get pensions for this shit?!?

I don't care if this guy is confirmed or not...but Geezus...do your fucking JOBS and quit inventing excuses to not WORK.

Is it any surprise a Mussolini-wannabe candidate has Repube voters in a frenzy? Mad as hell, indeed.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Angry? A little, Bambi. More like sick and tired of these congress welfare fucks serving decades and doing 20 minutes of actual work, all paid for with our tax dollars. That, and smiling while getting lobbyist cash up their ass, globe-trotting, "fact-finding" junkets to see who comes back with the better tan...and they get pensions for this shit?!?

I don't care if this guy is confirmed or not...but Geezus...do your fucking JOBS and quit inventing excuses to not WORK.

Is it any surprise a Mussolini-wannabe candidate has Repube voters in a frenzy? Mad as hell, indeed.
Originally Posted by Prolongus
The Senate did all they were required to do by the Constitution. They advised Odumbo not to make a nomination, because they weren't going to give consent. End of story: "Elections have consequences."
lustylad's Avatar
Angry? A little, Bambi. More like sick and tired of these congress welfare fucks serving decades and doing 20 minutes of actual work, all paid for with our tax dollars. That, and smiling while getting lobbyist cash up their ass, globe-trotting, "fact-finding" junkets to see who comes back with the better tan...and they get pensions for this shit?!?

I don't care if this guy is confirmed or not...but Geezus...do your fucking JOBS and quit inventing excuses to not WORK.

Is it any surprise a Mussolini-wannabe candidate has Repube voters in a frenzy? Mad as hell, indeed. Originally Posted by Prolongus
Lol! Sounds like Prolapse is a closet il Duce sympathizer. No love for the political class.

The Hildabeast set a record for miles logged on the taxpayers' dime as SOS. Did she do any real work? Oh yeah, she protected our people in Libya!
Because your ilk are pathetically making an issue out 8 months, eatbibeau, when your ilk was hypocritically pushing to block appointments for 18 months. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
It's a simple question, IB. What arbitrary number of months is okay to to hold up a vote on a nomination? And how did you come to that completely arbitrary number? Why couldn't one also use that arbitrary definition to require all SCOTUS vacancies to remain open until the next election?

The fact of the matter remains that if they hold up a vote on a nomination for 8 months, they will have done something that has definitely not been done in the last 100 years.

You can pretend all you want that others currently serving have done this, but it just isn't true.
The Republicans are currently in charge, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, and will be until at least next January, you ridiculously moronic jackass. Regardless of what happens in the election, the Republicans still have a lame-duck session before any new president takes office, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. In the event the Republicans do capture additional Senate seats, they can damn well tell a dim-retard president to take his nominees and go to hell, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.




+1

"[C]urrently [Hildabeast has a FBI investigation and] at least 38 lawsuits, including one filed by The Associated Press." Originally Posted by I B Hankering
How do you know republicans will be in charge dildo breath? They may go down with Trump. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
What will your ilk do if Hillary is elected, and nominates a real liberal??? Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Other than your ridiculous meltdown you have no answers chicken dick.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/1...act-god-or-fbi