You can't teach an old dog new tricks when he thinks the old tricks are just so gosh-darned awesome.

I've had all 3 kinds of doubles.#3 is brilliant. Gotta remember that one for future reference!
1) All about me. The ladies did not interact.
2) Full-blown 3-way, everybody doing everybody.
3) I also recently did a "split double". Two ladies are roommates at an incall. I had seen both of them at searate times. I scheduled a session with one of them, then took them both out to lunch, then came back and had a session with the other.
#3 was a unique experience in itself, gives the older guy some recovery time that a normal session wouldn't have. But #2 is a LOT of fun. Originally Posted by ezman
I feel incredibly bad now that I've started a thread that's gone down this path. I never meant for this to turn into a thread about the client. I only mentioned the experience as an explanation to my question.
I had a good time with the client. He obviously got exactly what he wanted, which was by no means bad or weird in my opinion. I just wouldn't have classified that as "wanting doubles."
Having only done one, I was more interested in an opinion as to what guys were truly looking for when they asked for doubles. I know I had a great first (and second) experience, but they were obviously incredibly different.
I didn't think the client was weird, nor did I judge him for his preference. While trying to decide if it was something I wanted to continue to offer I wanted a better idea as to the types and likelihood I'd run into each.
I like playing with guys and now I like playing with girls (with more limitations). The session went well and I never meant to make it sound like it didn't. He was happy, I was happy, I assume Sophie was happy. I just left confused.
I didn't think google would have great answers to a question like that. I thought a forum would be the appropiate venue for my question. However, I obviously handled it wrong. I should have left out the explanation and just gone for a poll or something along those lines. I never realized the conversation would become about him. I just wanted opinions on the fantasy behind doubles.
I love to play. Period. I also understand that my desires, during this, come second (normally they get handled along the way which is all the better). That I'm perfectly fine with. If I agree to see you, and you've explained the circumstances, then I play by those. I would meet him again. He had fun, I had fun, but just not in the way I expected.
I truly never meant for this to turn into what it did. I apologize to anyone that was offended along the way (it bothers me immensely as well). I'll search harder on google next time...
Also, as an unimportant side point, I wasn't looking for the session to be all about Sophie and I either. In my personal life, all my experiences the girls never touched even though the guy wanted it. Just as the appeal (if it exists) for the guy is the exotic (though obviously the details of why it is seem to vary) it was the same for me. I loved the time with the guy, just unexotic (which most of the time I prefer anyways).
I truly am sorry. I never meant for this to happen. Originally Posted by MaddietheCoed
Big Jake said: I like one chick doing the dishes and one cleaning the bathroom.+1!
Sterling,
You want to unleash Jules on poor innocent Maddie? Well that will be a real education for her, to say the least. Originally Posted by Sensual Sophia