OP is a fake handle, Old-T.Really? What a shock!
Everyone here knows that.
Originally Posted by Toyz
Was the OP's post about "sides" or a practice in place of speculating about the medical condition of a member without actually naming him?As is usually the case, a post typically can be read at more than one level.
Toyz and gang are running around quite freely insinuating that ***** ******* is having some sort of melt down and needs medical attention.
People have complained for a long time about rules being unfairly applied when they really did not understand those rules and why some people couldn't be held accountable in the manner they believed they should. Now these same people are way across the line themselves.... Originally Posted by Whispers
As is usually the case, a post typically can be read at more than one level.Nobody want to deal with you in National any more? Proof??? Or just shut up!
Given the nature of this forum the past little while I read the OP I. A bit broader context (as I am often want to do). I read it as, in an only slightly generalized way, a complaint that two individuals are undermining the value/credibility of the board. While I understand the OP's point, my reply was that the usefulness and credibility is being trashed by a clear uncivil war among two sides, yet the OP only condemns one of those sides. And oddly, the side that has made far fewerr pablumizing posts.
While I agree that the one side is stepping across the delineated bounds more often, I believe the other side--exemplified by SL's spam attacks--is equally detrimental to the usefulness of this forum. Probably more so.
Thus my generalization from the OP's rather narrow statement to a broader commentary on the lawless gun toting world that is the Austin forum. Originally Posted by Old-T
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=3]If you think that ones funny, check this one out! This is from the fake OPs original post...I didn't read it that way Toyz.... Your ignorance continues to shine....
[i]"If this is allowable it seems to reason that next we could see people beginning to out other people by first building a reference to someone in all one's comments that he is an Internet Warrior and then beginning discussion about him like " I have this friend that works at XXXXXXXX as in the position of XXXXXXXXX and he is addicted to posting on ECCIE.Com as an Internet Warrior. If you don't believe me drive by XXX XXXXXXXX RD and you will see him sitting at his computer 24/7 logged onto ECCIE."
He is actually predicting the future and wanting something enforced off of something that has not happened! Originally Posted by Toyz
I didn't read it that way Toyz.... Your ignorance continues to shine....Did anyone expect you to see it any other way? Since you most likely wrote it...LOL
I think he's presenting a hypothetical way someone might first refer to someone as .... hmmm... say... "The Ignorant One" a few dozen times the way you have referred to SL and his "meltdown".......... and then start a thread that they have this really ignorant friend that lives at {RL Address} and works at {real life company} and use the precedent you are setting in your medical questions threads and posts to out someone...... but of course to hide behind the fact that they never really use the members name.... Originally Posted by Whispers
I didn't read it that way Toyz.... Your ignorance continues to shine....Seems your the only one saying 2 + 2 =5. Who are you trying to out? That's against the rules...
I think he's presenting a hypothetical way someone might first refer to someone as .... hmmm... say... "The Ignorant One" a few dozen times the way you have referred to SL and his "meltdown".......... and then start a thread that they have this really ignorant friend that lives at {RL Address} and works at {real life company} and use the precedent you are setting in your medical questions threads and posts to out someone...... but of course to hide behind the fact that they never really use the members name.... Originally Posted by Whispers
Seems your the only one saying 2 + 2 =5. Who are you trying to out? That's against the rules... Originally Posted by budman33I KNOW!
I didn't read it that way Toyz.... Your ignorance continues to shine....
I think he's presenting a hypothetical way someone might first refer to someone as .... hmmm... say... "The Ignorant One" a few dozen times the way you have referred to SL and his "meltdown".......... and then start a thread that they have this really ignorant friend that lives at {RL Address} and works at {real life company} and use the precedent you are setting in your medical questions threads and posts to out someone...... but of course to hide behind the fact that they never really use the members name.... Originally Posted by Whispers