Romney tops Obama

Another figure pulled out of your ass. There are more than that on Medicare amd Medicaid now. WHAT IN THE WIDE WIDE WORLD OF SPORTS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

Its really tough trying to keep up with you bubba.

I got it from one of you guys that posted that number earlier.

I am having to keep up with at least 5 progressives/liberals. You are having a tough time keeping up with me that is classic.

Obama's very vulnerable because of the way the electoral college works.

Obama has to win every battleground state in order to be re-elected, and that's not gonna happen.

All the Republicans have to do is avoid nominating someone whose a complete idiot, and they will pick up two or three battleground states they didn't get before.

Face it eveyone.

Someone like Romney would sweep the floor with Obama given the poor economy and the former Obamamaniacs that are now independents.

I got it from one of you guys that posted that number earlier.

I am having to keep up with at least 5 progressives/liberals. You are having a tough time keeping up with me that is classic.
Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

Not because you're providing so much information. Trust me. In fact, I'd suggest you change your name and handle to something more indicative of your posting prowess:



From now on, you're YOGI!

All the Republicans have to do is avoid nominating someone whose a complete idiot, and they will pick up two or three battleground states they didn't get before. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

You might be right, TAE. But what are the chances?

Face it eveyone.

Someone like Romney would sweep the floor with Obama given the poor economy and the former Obamamaniacs that are now independents. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

What I want to know is, what's so poor about the economy? We've had nothing but growth since Obama was elected. Other than unemployment, which by the way has come down if ever so slightly, we've just about recovered from the recession.

As for unemployment, I am curious to know what the GOP might have done different. I mean, do they even have a plan? It's one thing to gripe about the other guy, but what is *their* plan? I haven't heard one yet.

My take is that we all better get used to higher unemployment, at least until employers start bringing the jobs back that they already sent to China and India in the last ten years. Best I can tell is we are well on our way to being a third world country, and the GOP wants us all working in the service industry for less than minimum wage with no benefits. We have no where to go but down once the unions are wiped out.

"Literally, if we took away the minimum wage—if conceivably it was gone—we could potentially virtually wipe out unemployment completely because we would be able to offer jobs at whatever level." —Michele Bachmann, 1/26/05

000000000111010101010122210101 0

000000000111010101010122210101 0 Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

What the fuck is that? TRINARY code? I think Booth got it right... you are the product of a comedy writer's pen, aren't you, Yogi?

twinkles....

"Obama leads all potential Republican challengers by double-digit margins, the poll showed. He is ahead of his closest Republican rival, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, by 13 percentage points -- 51 percent to 38 percent."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/pl_nm/us_usa_campaign_poll

This one shows a different story Sharp.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._tracking_poll

By the way, there is no such thing as different levels of being a Mormon. With the Mormon church, you're either in or your out, and it's not like mainstream Chrisitianity where you can take what's most convenient for you and throw thes rest out and still get away with it. Mormons pay 10% of their income to the church as a requirement, not an option. When I say Mormons believe something, it means ALL MORMONS believe something, including good ole' Mitt.

The Mormon religion is pretty fucked up. I do know some that are not as hard core. I am not saying that they don't believe some of it. Mitt is not my pick, but anything is better than Obama as far as wanting less Government. My choice is Herman Cain, but he probably will not get the nomination.

This one shows a different story Sharp.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._tracking_poll Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

That one shows almost nothing. 50% approve, 49% disapprove to some degree.

but there were some nuggets in there>

Rasmussen’s final 2010 projections were published in the Wall Street Journal. Scott Rasmussen noted that “it would be wise for all Republicans to remember that their team didn't win, the other team lost. Heading into 2012, voters will remain ready to vote against the party in power unless they are given a reason not to do so.”

Americans I think will vote against incumbents because we don't trust any of these career politicians.

For the second week in a row, a generic Republican candidate edges President Obama 45% to 42% among Likely U.S. Voters in a hypothetical 2012 election matchup, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...dential_ballot