Trumped!

... a link you posted for the proposition that the Clinton Administration didn't have "intelligence" confirmation that WMD's were in Iraq and Iraqis had a WMD development program?

Why would I want to look at it? Because you posted it?

That reason enough to ignore it!!!! That's pretty fucking simple!

You don't even need your grandkids ... Predator Bill lays it out!

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...s/clinton.html

"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors." December 16, 1998. Originally Posted by LexusLover

The link was to The Donald's speech in Poland, no matter how hard you try to spin it.
some of you old guys really slip fast. Need new glasses?

Who's cherry picking? So you're admitting you made up the story about Trump not believing the intel on NK... This is why you have no cred.

You're a flip-flopping fake news faggot! Originally Posted by lustylad

You ignorant fuck.

Who is telling Trump the Russiams are a problem?

Is it the same intel community that is telling him NK is a big problem?

Why yes it is.

Yet he cherry picks what to believe.

Fucking LexyLiar has already regurgitated shock n awe.

Wow , we still haven't been able to put that Genie back in the bottle....yet you two numbnuts want Donald Trump to destabilize that part of the world.

You ignorant fuck.

Who is telling Trump the Russiams are a problem?

Is it the same intel community that is telling him NK is a big problem?

Why yes it is.

Yet he cherry picks what to believe.

Fucking LexyLiar has already regurgitated shock n awe.

Wow , we still haven't been able to put that Genie back in the bottle....yet you two numbnuts want Donald Trump to destabilize that part of the world. Originally Posted by WTF

And it was the same intel community that told W43 that there was WMDs in Iraq you fuckwad. Playing devils advocate can bite you in the ass when you don't pay attention. But you're a dumb Snitch dick detective.

And it was the same intel community that told W43 that there was WMDs in Iraq you fuckwad. Playing devils advocate can bite you in the ass when you don't pay attention. But you're a dumb Snitch dick detective. Originally Posted by bambino

So the intel community was wrong about wmd's, Russia hacking but right about North Korea getting ready to nuke us. Because that is wtf LexyLiar and lustyhomo are scared of!

Military experts (not lemmings) are recommending a military engagement with NK would be a disaster. Originally Posted by bamscram

Yes. For South Korea.

Truth is, China wants things to stay just like they are. They could care less if NK has the Bomb, they know they can't use it.

China does not want a Democratic Korea next door.

Yes. For South Korea.

Truth is, China wants things to stay just like they are. They could care less if NK has the Bomb, they know they can't use it.

China does not want a Democratic Korea next door. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Would we want China or Russia to say have military bases in Mexico?

But China b36tter get used to it because LexusLover is ready to go all Shock n Awe on NK's ass!



.

You ignorant fuck.

Who is telling Trump the Russiams (sic) are a problem?

Is it the same intel community that is telling him NK is a big problem?

Why yes it is. Originally Posted by WTF

So fagboy, who exactly is this so-called "intel community"? You only know what the MSM spoon-feeds you. For 8 months, the Trump-hating media has been telling us over and over again it was the solemn consensus of "17 intelligence agencies" that the Rooskis interfered with our election.

Now lookee what I stumbled on at the end of a New York Times story last week...

"Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community."

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/06/2...is-allies.html

Daayyuumm! Did the NYT get it wrong for the past 8 months? That's what happens when you don't fact-check your DNC talking points!

North Korea is about as much of a threat as Iraq was back in 2003. How soon you chickenhawks forget Originally Posted by WTF

And pray tell, what will it take for him to be considered a BIG threat?? Putting a nuke on San fran? Seattle?? Guam?

And pray tell, what will it take for him to be considered a BIG threat?? Putting a nuke on San fran? Seattle?? Guam? Originally Posted by garhkal

WTF is always playing Monday Morning Quarterback.

If he's wrong about NK, who will be on Eccie to hold his feet to the fire about being WRONG AGAIN? He still has to outlive his Zimmerman/Martin prediction that Zimmerman would be convicted "of something" in the trial over the death of Martin. WTF continues to pretend to be an expert and the only "argument" he has is ... someone is a "liar" .... which reminds me of recess on public school grounds with the standard ignorant, immature response: "you're a liar"! He even posts a picture of a house he claims to have built, then tries to retreat by "asking" how anyone knows if he actually posted it ... like someone was using his account!

Then he threatens "outing" for repeating what he said, then it's a threat of violence ... even recently asserting he was going to knock out someone's teeth .....

WTF is always playing Monday Morning Quarterback.

If he's wrong about NK, who will be on Eccie to hold his feet to the fire about being WRONG AGAIN? He still has to outlive his Zimmerman/Martin prediction that Zimmerman would be convicted "of something" in the trial over the death of Martin. WTF continues to pretend to be an expert and the only "argument" he has is ... someone is a "liar" .... which reminds me of recess on public school grounds with the standard ignorant, immature response: "you're a liar"! He even posts a picture of a house he claims to have built, then tries to retreat by "asking" how anyone knows if he actually posted it ... like someone was using his account!

Then he threatens "outing" for repeating what he said, then it's a threat of violence ... even recently asserting he was going to knock out someone's teeth ..... Originally Posted by LexusLover

SnitchFuck couldn't kick Asswipes ass. And that would be pretty easy. But if he had your RW info, he would rat you out in a heartbeat!

Yes. For South Korea.

Truth is, China wants things to stay just like they are. They could care less if NK has the Bomb, they know they can't use it.

China does not want a Democratic Korea next door. Originally Posted by Jackie S

There are a shitload of American civilians, and military personnel there.

And pray tell, what will it take for him to be considered a BIG threat?? Putting a nuke on San fran? Seattle?? Guam? Originally Posted by garhkal

No country is going to nuke this country....unless this country attacks them first. That includes North Korea. It also included Iraq.

Do we want any country getting nukes? No. Why? Because we then can not control them. So then, why doesn't any country that does not want to be controlled, want one?

If we'd quit meddling in others affairs...they'd have no need for nukes.

So how about the NYT's and Donald Trump accurately saying that all relevant agencies investigating the hacking in the 2016 elect came to the same conclusion that it was the Russians. Why is Trump trying to discredit these conclusions? .

Daayyuumm! Did the NYT get it wrong for the past 8 months? That's what happens when you don't fact-check your DNC talking points! Originally Posted by lustylad

Let's dig a little deeper Miss Level Playing Field...

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/06/u...a-fbi-nsa.html

President Trump said on Thursday that only “three or four” of the United States’ 17 intelligence agencies had concluded that Russia interfered in the presidential election — a statement that while technically accurate, is misleading and suggests widespread dissent among American intelligence agencies when none has emerged.


The reason the views of only those four intelligence agencies, not all 17, were included in the assessment is simple: They were the ones tracking and analyzing the Russian campaign. The rest were doing other work....

...Mr. Trump was also correct about inaccurate news reports. Some, including an article in The New York Times, incorrectly reported that all 17 American intelligence agencies had endorsed the assessment....

...But there is no evidence that significant uncertainty or dissent exists across the intelligence community, simply because not all 17 were involved in the assessment of Russian interference.

WTF is always playing Monday Morning Quarterback.
..... Originally Posted by LexusLover

Actually...I was the one who made a prediction. That is not Monday morning Quarterbacking.
That my prediction turned out wrong does not mean I Monday morning QB'd.

Monday morning Quarterbacking is wtf you did AFTER the trial.

You are to chicken shit to make a real prediction.

Yours are like "I need to kill him before he kills me!"

That is more a justification than a prediction.

If he's wrong about NK, who will be on Eccie to hold his feet to the fire about being WRONG AGAIN?

..... Originally Posted by LexusLover

Under your train of thought....I could walk up and blow your gay brain out and then claim you were going to kill that crybaby, bambino and lustyladyboy hates for babies to be killed so he would agree that I was justified in killing you.

Then he threatens "outing" for repeating what he said, then it's a threat of violence ... even recently asserting he was going to knock out someone's teeth ..... Originally Posted by LexusLover

Threatens outing?

You linked repeatedly to a two year old thread that you thought linked to my personal information.

OK....as beautiful a city as Pissburg is, I'm not flying up to knock out lustylad's teeth so he can charge extra to blow your hypocritical ass.

17 intelligence agencies. that is alot of agencies for intelligence work.

when you look below those numbers, I question some of these agencies are considered intelligence agencies due to the type of work they do.

these are the 17 listed.

................