Racist Fetterman Vandalized a Black Owned Business

Proof. Where is it? For a crime to be convicted, you need to have a few things.

1. Charges
2. Proof of a crime
3. Conviction or admission

You got zero.

Same moral compass I have is the one you conservative cuck types have been using above to claim Trump's innocence.

Cept Trump has been charged and there has been proof. Fetterman was never even charged. Glad none of you are attorneys

Proof. Where is it? For a crime to be convicted, you need to have a few things.

1. Charges
2. Proof of a crime
3. Conviction or admission

You got zero.
Originally Posted by eyecu2

Again - Racist Fetterman admitted he broke the law and vandalized a black owned business.

But you go on pretending this didn't happen or is perfectly ok for anyone to do

It is really pathetic that you continue making excuses for Racist Fetterman breaking the law. And just like Racist Fetterman, you can't admit you are wrong.

Since Eyecu must like pics - here is Racist Fetterman caught dead to rights on camera vandalizing a Black Owned Business

eyecu, I hope you have the integrity to give an honest answer to this. Had you seen a news report that a Republican candidate had vandalized a sign on a business owned by a black person, would you be accusing that candidate of racism? If you are being honest, you know darn well you would, or at least you would not be looking at the nuance or details of the case.

Wow - Donna Brazil - another blow to Racist Fetterman

Donna Brazil: "You've got to be on the ground. You've got to be in the community. You've got to be like Dr. Oz, the other night in North Philadelphia talking to black preachers, talking to black families about crime."

Watch

https://twitter.com/i/status/1578460651336376320

Did he vandalize the sign because they were black?

Did he vandalize the sign because they were black? Originally Posted by HDGristle

Obviously not. Just because the owner was black has nothing to do with him supposedly changing the lettering to "not". It had everything to do with the fact that this nuisance bar was becoming notorious for shootings and bad actors. The hypocrites on the right here don't realize has zero to do with race, but 100% to do with integrity and a desire to have a safe neighborhood.

And for the record I'm not disputing this supposed vandalism, but trying to put it into context as to what was actually done. Was it done with a sharpie marker, or did he simply move a few letters around on a marquee sign? I've yet to see any news source stating what happened.

The video captures a person standing in front of a doorway or a building. It doesn't show anything nefarious, nor does it show them pulling out any item of destruction. When someone accuses someone of vandalism, and you see no act, or some nefarious action, or a item that would facilitate the same vandalism, it's hard to draw the same conclusion of vandalism. Additionally all you see is a fuzzy large human in the video, there is absolutely no positive mechanism of identification that is Fetterman.

Again I'm not suggesting he has innocence, but this video doesn't prove shit, as it shows him touching nothing, or using any tool, or any other item to deface property, and it's hard to even determine who the heck the person in the video is, enough that almost 100% would have some sense of reasonable doubt, unless the dude copped to it.

It's just another ruse from our conservative friends here to try to control a narrative that has nothing to do with politics, because Dr Oz offers very little alternative from being yet another talking head, carpetbagger from TV.

Absolutely not the kind of guy we need representing Pennsylvania

eyecu, I hope you have the integrity to give an honest answer to this. Had you seen a news report that a Republican candidate had vandalized a sign on a business owned by a black person, would you be accusing that candidate of racism? If you are being honest, you know darn well you would, or at least you would not be looking at the nuance or details of the case. Originally Posted by Smarty1

Sadly the devil is always in the details, and I for one want to make sure I understand if someone was accused of a crime, why did they do it? Similar to a spouse that was abused, and then police found her with a gun over top of the husband's body, would she be simply a murderer, or would she have some level of detail that would provide a reasonable question to the obvious death. Assuming fetterman did admit to defacing this property, does it rise to the level of vandalism? Does writing on a dollar bill become defacing, or vandalism? I realize that you may think nuance doesn't play A part in these kinds of actions, but I believe it plays a huge part.

Was Kyle Rittenhouse a murderer, or was he a zealous protector of someone's property? - it's all in the details.

Did he vandalize the sign because they were black? Originally Posted by HDGristle

You would have to ask him. But given he is brain damaged, he will be unable to answer. The bottom line is Racist Fetterman:

1. knew it was a black owned business,
2. he knew he was committing a criminal act against this black owned business
3. he was caught dead to rights on camera vandalizing this black owned business

Not the only racist incident Racist Fetterman was caught doing

I wasn't talking to you, berry. But your opinion is duly noted.

You haven't even made a prima facie case for racial animus, because you don't have anything to present and connect the wrong dots, as is tradition.

I wonder why that is?

To be clear, I am talking to you now, sport

It's amazing to watch the usual shitposting suspects here trip all over themselves to make excuses for a racist libtard who broke the law

But no matter their lame attempts to spin this, the fact remains that Racist Fetterman broke the law and vandalized a black owned business in his town when he was mayor

Show the racial animus

We'll continue to wait

Meanwhile Fetterman has risen in the 538 polls.. plus 6.6% over Oz.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/

If Racist Fetterman was a Republican, we’d be having non-stop coverage of his racist violence and refusal to debate but because he has a D after his name, the libtard media ignore it

They'd show the racial animus, too. Why can't you?