"Dude"? Ok. I'll roll with that. (haha!)
This is a discussion about a provider hypothetically becoming impregnated.
You're arguing that because you "have to wear a condom" that the provider "should have to be on the pill".
To me, that's just funny.( ridiculous funny, not haha funny)
Sure, it's in everyone's best interest that both sides take whatever precautions necessary to prevent such a pregnancy
but for you to say that they "have to be on the pill", is just silly.
How is anyone going to enforce this rule? How are you going to demand that any provider do anything; what, The Pill Police??
Asking her for her medical records???
Yeah, that'll work.
That's as ridiculous as saying that they "have to tell you if they've got an infectious
medical condition", or that "have to tell you if they've got a dependency issue".
They should have to disclose this too. Are you so naive to believe that information such as this is freely and willingly disclosed? Do you think that it ever will be??
Same thing with your pill argument; it's not gonna' happen.
Maybe in a perfect world. But if it were a perfect world, this entire discussion would be moot.
.
Originally Posted by Termite
Did I say they MUST? No. I said, that they SHOULD.
Did I say they should disclose their medical records? NO.
It is kind of like saying all guys should have a hobby phone. It isn't REQUIRED to hobby, but it ain't too smart not to have one.
You like to take things out of context...