Alfred E Neuman for POTUS!!!

SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
You're in denial. You need to come with about ten more examples, because we came up with more than ten examples without breaking a sweat.

The right has had enough of being insulted by the supercilious and hypocritical left.

The current dim-retard governor of Virginia won the election by painting his Republican adversary as a red-neck racist, and look at who the fuck was caught wearing black face in college -- and that lying, hypocritical POS is still in office.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Since Trump took office, or take it back earlier to when he first started campaigning to be POTUS, there have probably been MILLIONS of articles written about him or news reports/discussions on him. A very small handful have made comparisons between him and Hitler. Probably less than .0000001%.

Your statement:

"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."

Simply not true, or even close to it.
It's hell to have short term memory...from one post to the next!!
You sure it's not .00000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000001%
If you're going to feign memory lose might as well go BIG.
Can we classify you now as a BULLSHITER??
Your percentage is <1 article in 10 MILLION!!
  • oeb11
  • 05-15-2019, 09:48 AM
SR -Quote - Since Trump took office, or take it back earlier to when he first started campaigning to be POTUS, there have probably been MILLIONS of articles written about him or news reports/discussions on him. A very small handful have made comparisons between him and Hitler. Probably less than .0000001%.



Show some factual support for that number - or admit is just a personal opinion fabrication.

Look at the posts - including from some on vacation - labeling Trump and non-DPST's as nazi hitlers -on this forum.
You are on an untenable argument.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Since Trump took office, or take it back earlier to when he first started campaigning to be POTUS, there have probably been MILLIONS of articles written about him or news reports/discussions on him. A very small handful have made comparisons between him and Hitler. Probably less than .0000001%.

Your statement:

"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."

Simply not true, or even close to it.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Even MSNBC has admitted to what you choose to disingenuously and dishonestly ignore:

Pundits and candidates alike are now accusing Donald Trump of being a fascist or neo-Nazi. Some are even comparing him to Adolf Hitler...

There are three qualities to Trump’s presidential campaign that invoke parallels to Nazism.

(MSNBC)
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
It's hell to have short term memory...from one post to the next!!
You sure it's not .00000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000001%
If you're going to feign memory lose might as well go BIG.
Can we classify you now as a BULLSHITER??
Your percentage is <1 article in 10 MILLION!! Originally Posted by bb1961
Is there a point you made there? My point is the number of references to Trump/Hitler made either in news media is so rare it can barely be counted. Yes it happens. Is it significant? No.
  • oeb11
  • 05-15-2019, 10:57 AM
A post today in another thread made the comparison.

SR- do not take a cue from the DPST leadership re the Collusion narrative - Leftist comparisons to Hitler and Nazi are a favorite DPST ploy -

How about- rather than being in Denial - admit it happens, and perhaps consider a statement that those comparisons are not appropriate.



Not any more appropriate than comparing Pelosi to Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Kim.

Perhaps????
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Even MSNBC has admitted to what you choose to disingenuously and dishonestly ignore: Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Did you happen to notice that the article names NO ONE specifically!! I read both the NY Times and the local newspaper today and although there are several articles on Trump, not one compared him to Hitler.

And do you still stand by your "almost everyone" statement? I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.

"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
A post today in another thread made the comparison.

SR- do not take a cue from the DPST leadership re the Collusion narrative - Leftist comparisons to Hitler and Nazi are a favorite DPST ploy -

How about- rather than being in Denial - admit it happens, and perhaps consider a statement that those comparisons are not appropriate.

Not any more appropriate than comparing Pelosi to Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Kim.

Perhaps???? Originally Posted by oeb11
A post by someone in a hooker board forum is not even worth mentioning. It has happened several times before by certain individuals.

I said it happens but so infrequently as to not even be a factor in campaign rhetoric. If people want to compare Pelosi to Lenin, Staling, Mao, and Kim I have no problem with it. Read what is written/said and don't automatically dismiss the comments.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Did you happen to notice that the article names NO ONE specifically!! I read both the NY Times and the local newspaper today and although there are several articles on Trump, not one compared him to Hitler.

And do you still stand by your "almost everyone" statement? I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.

"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
The point is that even MSNBC recognizes what you won't admit. The references and comparisons are so ubiquitous (meaning specific references are not needed) that even a lib-retard outfit like MSNBC concedes what is common knowledge to all who are intelligent and willing to see reality and truth.
Leave speed alone...he's on a BSing role.
I just saw he now has 23 candidates to choice from to beat Trump....decisions...decisions .
  • grean
  • 05-15-2019, 02:06 PM
It is a self defense mechanism - they are brutally hateful towards him so he must fight back. We are in a cold civil war so we can't be nice guys to the liberals who want to enslave us. Originally Posted by friendly fred
Let's be honest. He completely brought it on himself. He won the election and then kept on talking out of his ass about anyone and everyone who wasn't in step with him.

Had he just learned to nor tweet about every thought that went into his head, he would not have to be so up in arms.
lustylad's Avatar
...there have probably been MILLIONS of articles written about him or news reports/discussions on him. A very small handful have made comparisons between him and Hitler. Probably less than .0000001%. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
The references and comparisons are so ubiquitous... that even a lib-retard outfit like MSNBC concedes what is common knowledge to all who are intelligent and willing to see reality and truth. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Speedy, you need to pick your fights more carefully!

The constant left-wing media refrain that Trump is as dangerous as Hitler has been so ubiquitous that I even started a thread about it:

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2290597

As you can see, the WSJ made fun of this crazy, hysterical narrative. The WSJ doesn't usually bother to write editorials ridiculing opinions that are held and expressed by only a tiny, tiny sliver of journalists.

They cited specific examples of Trump-Hitler comparisons made by leading media publications - Vox, the Atlantic, WaPo. And that was over a year ago.
Speedy, you need to pick your fights more carefully!

The constant left-wing media refrain that Trump is as dangerous as Hitler has been so ubiquitous that I even started a thread about it:

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2290597

As you can see, the WSJ made fun of this crazy, hysterical narrative. The WSJ doesn't usually bother to write editorials ridiculing opinions that are held and expressed by only a tiny, tiny sliver of journalists.

They cited specific examples of Trump-Hitler comparisons made by leading media publications - Vox, the Atlantic, WaPo. And that was over a year ago. Originally Posted by lustylad
They are comparing Trump to Hitler, lol. Hitler was supposedly responsible for killing Six Million People and Trump has insulted Six Million People, who by the way probably deserved it. To Liberals thats a valid comparison, lol.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Did you happen to notice that the article names NO ONE specifically!! I read both the NY Times and the local newspaper today and although there are several articles on Trump, not one compared him to Hitler.

And do you still stand by your "almost everyone" statement? I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.

"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
today the Trump-Hitler narrative is wearing thin. they tried it before and after the election, for two years. they had to move on because none of their grave and dire predictions came true.

in fact the media overwhelmingly did compare Trump to Hitler. but guess what?

they are still doing it

note the date on this article ..

Updated 4:04 PM ET, Wed March 20, 2019


that's not last year or two years ago. Barely two months ago ..

Top House Democrats compare Trump's rise to Hitler's

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/20/polit...son/index.html


you WILL see more of this. They will dust off the "Hitler!" chat any day now .. oh snap! here's Beto the Bozo .. doing it now!!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwu0fxPCjS8


by the way ... Beto had to "reset" his campaign. we all know what that means yeah?

his campaign is floundering right out of the gate.


BAHHAHAHAAHAHAAAAa
Does the left really want their first openly gay candidate to be named ' Booty-Keg ' ?
Kind of like picking two puppets without genitals which are operated by someone with a hand up their ass to be icons of gay couples.