They're coming (and they said it would never happen)

CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 12-29-2012, 11:53 AM
OK then, its not ANY politician.


correct ... hes the ONLY politician to place a Permanent Ban on guns
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
But not all guns, is that right, CBJ7? Which ones were banned, and which ones were allowed? Simple question. Why are you avoiding it?
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 12-29-2012, 12:12 PM
it matters what guns to a constitutionalist such as yourself?
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Just asking, CBJ7. If you don't know, you don't know.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 12-29-2012, 12:22 PM
Just asking, CBJ7. If you don't know, you don't know. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

some 18 or 19 different models that fit the definition of assault weapons ... specifically, I cant name them all ..

the 94 legislation excluded any assault weapons and clips made before 1994, and kept them legal to own .. to the best of my knowledge, those are now included in the 04 legislation Romney passed and are now illegal.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
How is Romney's ban different from what Clinton passed, and what Obama will likely pass?
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 12-29-2012, 01:07 PM
How is Romney's ban different from what Clinton passed, and what Obama will likely pass? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

willards ban was PERMANENT (the 94 laws had a sunset clause) and included weapons that the 94 legislation didnt


why are you asking stupid questions that Ive already answered?
Just asking, CBJ7. If you don't know, you don't know. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
That never stopped you from blurting out a StupidOldFart response to a question that you know absolutely nothing about!

why are you asking stupid questions that Ive already answered? Originally Posted by CJ7
Perhaps it is because he is a StupidOldFart!
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Okay this should be simple. What Romney passed only affected Massachusetts which does not have 2nd amendment protection on the state level. What Obama will be trying to do runs completely counter to the US Constutition which he swear an oath to protect.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 12-29-2012, 02:50 PM
Massachusetts is exempt from the constitution?


and you carry a handgun to class ?


well, teach ... youre dismissed.
Okay this should be simple. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Ut oh, that should eliminate JD, StupidOldFart, I B Lying&Crying, Whirly and Joe the Bloehard from the conversation.

Next topic?
Stevie, stevie, stevie... The Brady Bill brought us the instant background check. The Assault Weapon Ban was another bill. Ronald Reagan was supporting the Brady Bill three years (check the date) before the AWB was passed. No assault weapon was used the day that Reagan and Brady were shot. It was a .22 caliber revolver. When the AWB was signed the house, the senate, and the White House were controlled by democrats. You know the party that tried to disarm black people with weapon bans in the 1860s, 1870s, and 1880s. It makes it too hard for the white democrat racist to lynch an innocent black person if they have guns. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Idiot! The articles were clearly about TWO SEPARATE BILLS, both of which REAGAN SUPPORTED!
LexusLover's Avatar
...Massachusetts which does not have 2nd amendment protection on the state level. What Obama will be trying to do runs completely counter to the US Constutition which he swear an oath to protect. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
uh.... the 2nd amendment applies to the State via the 14th amendment ...

McDonald v. Chicago, 561 US 3025 (2010)
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
So what if the bills have a sunset clause. It is still a ban. And, CBJ7, you still haven't told me how Romney's bill is different from what has been law, and what is being proposed.

Besides, couldn't the Massachusetts legislature reverse the ban at any time? Then it wasn't permanent.

Gawd, it's such a simple question.
Gawd, it's such a simple question. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
As I clearly stated earlier, that eliminates you!

Please pay closer attention!