Please...let's get one thing clarified. I control the purse strings, the narrative of all my relationships, and what I want yall to think. ;-) The Why? will always be an interesting question. ;-)^ PMXCC ok sweetie but the OP would do well to avoid you. You're another one of those nutty as hell penny pinching tricks. Weird as fuck prancing around looking for discounts. The proof is in your response. Guys like you prey on girls just starting out trying to exploit their inexperience and naievety. I maintain they should charge you fuckers for pics and vids. Those should be extras...and yall caught up in writing the reviews for 1 of 3 reasons. 1.) you're cheap as fuck and only want a discount. 2) you can use the power of a negative review as possible extortion or threats to hurt the girl 3.) some of you truly think you're Reality Kingz or Bang Bro's next star.The hobby baller speaketh. lol.
I reckon you and most like you write as a #1 or #2. Soon I'm going to submit a change recommendation to Dearhunter and St. C to possibly help prevent tricks like you from lording it over new and inexperienced gals with the review process. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
This thread is not a good look for the OP, imo. She should have just left it alone and put her nose to the grindstone racking up yes reviews. Originally Posted by pxmccThis is nothing but a "prey on you statement" and to me is only used by tricks that like to prey and take advantage of people. Why should she leave it alone? Because the offender is your "friend". Yea right....fuck outta here with that nonsense. If a guy writes a bad review the lady should be able to defend herself. Telling her to keep her mouth shut is the worst thing possible because it allows a perception of her to remain when there is a 50/50 chance the reviwer is telling a lie. Her not saying anything also encourages people like you to try to shit on them with the hopes they'll be too scared to call you out. Like I said I could peep you had fundamental character issues.
This is nothing but a "prey on you statement" and to me is only used by tricks that like to prey and take advantage of people. Why should she leave it alone? Because the offender is your "friend". Yea right....fuck outta here with that nonsense. If a guy writes a bad review the lady should be able to defend herself. Telling her to keep her mouth shut is the worst thing possible because it allows a perception of her to remain when there is a 50/50 chance the reviwer is telling a lie. Her not saying anything also encourages people like you to try to shit on them with the hopes they'll be too scared to call you out. Like I said I could peep you had fundamental character issues.That's not it at all. The issues raised by Skittlez' review were never even addressed by the OP. I have no issue with a gal having her say, whoever the hobbyist may be. Posts like these should be reserved for rebuttals, and her post rebuts nothing. The no stands as it was.
Carry on. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
Then maybe your boy should have taken your advice and STFU and not wrote the review? The problem I have after reading her rebuttal is how dare he write a bad review when he's trying to essentially fuck for free by spending $120 on an Indy. Seems he was only there to take advantage of her newness so to speak. The only acceptable bad reviews in cases like this is if the provider puts your health or safety at risk. Sounds like he's just upset she didnt give him special treatment that he didnt pay for...and then to write the review a month later? seems like he's trying to be braggadocious about the fact he can hurt her anytime he feels like with a bad review. Aint nothing cool, original, or authhentic about his covert strong arm tactics.
Look, I've had bad sessions where it was best to stfu, and that's exactly what I did. Running your mouth is not always your best option. Not everyone is aware of that, apparently... lol. Originally Posted by pxmcc
Then maybe your boy should have taken your advice and STFU and not wrote the review? The problem I have after reading her rebuttal is how dare he write a bad review when he's trying to essentially fuck for free by spending $120 on an Indy. Seems he was only there to take advantage of her newness so to speak. The only acceptable bad reviews in cases like this is if the provider puts your health or safety at risk. Sounds like he's just upset she didnt give him special treatment that he didnt pay for...and then to write the review a month later? seems like he's trying to be braggadocious about the fact he can hurt her anytime he feels like with a bad review. Aint nothing cool, original, or authhentic about his covert strong arm tactics. Originally Posted by Sistine ChapelHe did not force her to offer her Rev Special. We live in a (mostly) free country.
I don't know why these dumbass Johns need to take pictures and video record their sessions with whores. Originally Posted by WolfWhistleFrom some of your self-reporting it appears it would be smart of the providers you see to video (and audio) record their sessions with you. And I'll repeat ... based on YOUR SELF-REPORTING not their posted complaints on the board.
Skittles, thresh and all those cheap stake penny pinhing dudes think they are doing these ladies a favor by taking pics and bargaining for rates LMAOAt least we live in a (mostly) free country, where providers and hobbyists can (mostly) make up their own minds as to what they feel comfortable doing and not doing. You think hobbyists with pics are the only thing potentially dicey in this game? Not even close.
And then they go ahead and pimp them out like they own them
They are a danger to the ladies with all those pics collected Originally Posted by Back2HoustonHobby
