Zimmerman was just following orders?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Jesus! it isn't even Monday morning yet, Corpy! give it a fucking rest!
I guess i thought the context of the discussion concerned a guy who was in fact, as proven in a court of law getting beat up by a 17 year old who weighed 40lbs less than he did, so he had to kill him with the gun he was carrying.... Originally Posted by Doove
Interesting. Perhaps you can tell me what part of my comment that you quoted was factually inaccurate.There you go, accurate now.
I'll wait. Originally Posted by Doove
Nope, any dream of a career in law enforcement is basically over. The trial showed he did not follow orders and policy which lead to the shooting. Police will want nothing to do with him Originally Posted by BigLouieWhat "order" did Zimmerman not follow, BL? How is it you can construe that a suggestion from a dispatcher (who has absolutely no legal authority: zilch) "Okay, we don't need you to do that" is an "order", BL?
Nope, any dream of a career in law enforcement is basically over. The trial showed he did not follow orders and policy which lead to the shooting. Police will want nothing to do with him Originally Posted by BigLouie
Nope, any dream of a career in law enforcement is basically over. The trial showed he did not follow orders and policy which lead to the shooting. Police will want nothing to do with him Originally Posted by BigLouieHmmm, put that way, maybe he should go to work for the IRS or some other federal agency, he'd fit right in.
you do realize that if martin would of killed zimmerman, he could of used self defense as a reason and the verdict could of been the same for him also, before people start slapping each other on the back, you're allowed to use deadly force if you think you will suffer bodily harm or death, and you don't have to show any wounds much less even been touched, really it would of been easier for martin to get off on self defense, since it's documented with the 911 call that zimmerman was following martin, not illegal at all, Originally Posted by dreamvacationdatesJust out of curiousity Dream, if it HAD happened that way, TM killing GZ with his pistol that he wrested away from him in the struggle, and the Police not arresting him for the shooting, do you think Sharpton, et al and the media would have made such a fuss as to MAKE the District Attorney bring TM to trial like they did with GZ?
you do realize that if martin would of killed zimmerman, he could of used self defense as a reason and the verdict could of been the same for him also, before people start slapping each other on the back, you're allowed to use deadly force if you think you will suffer bodily harm or death, and you don't have to show any wounds much less even been touched, really it would of been easier for martin to get off on self defense, since it's documented with the 911 call that zimmerman was following martin, not illegal at all, but since no one saw the initial contact he could of easily claimed that zimmerman instigated the fight, and to defend himself he had to kill him, since he had no weapon he had to use any means at his disposal,
So you see it could of easily been the other way around. as long as you kill that person and no one see it, you have reasonable doubt which means not guitly..and a affirmative defense since it only take your view at the time of the incident, both would of had the same view so both would of been justify to kill the other.
There is a old mafia proverb
Three can keep a secret if two are dead.
here's somthing else you can chew on.
there's the truth
and there is what you can prove.
Also, Zimmerman is young and has some issues, which means he's going to fuck up/slip up eventually, just like OJ, and the fates won't be so merciful next time. Originally Posted by dreamvacationdates
Just out of curiousity Dream, if it HAD happened that way, TM killing GZ with his pistol that he wrested away from him in the struggle, and the Police not arresting him for the shooting, do you think Sharpton, et al and the media would have made such a fuss as to MAKE the District Attorney bring TM to trial like they did with GZ? Originally Posted by RedLeg505True! This Zimmerman-Martin incident would have remained a local -- not national -- issue: just like all of the shootings in Chicago that continue to be ignored by the lib-retard media and race-baiters.
you do realize that if martin would of killed zimmerman, he could of used self defense as a reason and the verdict could of been the same for him also, before people start slapping each other on the back, you're allowed to use deadly force if you think you will suffer bodily harm or death, and you don't have to show any wounds much less even been touched, really it would of been easier for martin to get off on self defense, since it's documented with the 911 call that zimmerman was following martin, not illegal at all, but since no one saw the initial contact he could of easily claimed that zimmerman instigated the fight, and to defend himself he had to kill him, since he had no weapon he had to use any means at his disposal,Yep, FL law applies to all of the citizens in FL. (?)
So you see it could of easily been the other way around. as long as you kill that person and no one see it, you have reasonable doubt which means not guitly..and a affirmative defense since it only take your view at the time of the incident, both would of had the same view so both would of been justify to kill the other. Originally Posted by dreamvacationdates
if the undercover cop that Zimmerman attacked in 2005 had shot and killed him these knuckleheads would be yammering police brutality Originally Posted by CJ7Maybe, but you know what is worst, you won your case, but everyone that testifiy in you behalf, say's your a pussy, weak person, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag, now that got to be depressing, hell if he didn't have a gun he might have to worry about the local elementary school bully taking his lunch money.