I'm shocked and shaken, but still standing...

So a guy writes about a bad experience and he's a sadist troll who hates women? This is pure comedy , this place.

OHmyGOD Originally Posted by OHmyGOD
No Sir, you have every right to say what your experience was, as long as you did, in fact, experience it. As I was reading thru the threads some people stated that often reviews are fake. Marcianna herself stated that she was shocked over the last 2 negative reviews because she was in the hospital visiting someone and wasn't seeing clients lately, or whatever, something to that effect. She said the reviews were fake, and didn't know who the heck these guys were. Others chimed in and said some people just like to make life difficult and mess with their livelihood. I agreed that yes, there are people in the world like that.

Sir, I never said true hobbyists don't have a right to write a truthful review. I do not think, nor did I ever say that the hobbyisits were sadist. I explained that some people will in fact post fake/bogus/negative reviews because they hate women and want to mess with their financial livelihood.

I clearly explained what a sadist was, which is someone who purposly tries to hurt another for no reason. If you met a provider and the experience was bad or inadequate for whatever reason, then coming here or anywhere and stating your view of the experience is NOT a sadist. It is your truthful version of events. Placing bogus/nasty/negative/fake reviews does hurt the provider. So when you decide to hurt someone for no reason other than the simple pleasure of hurting another, you are a sadist.

Let me update my statistics here. Eccie is 25% providers, 25% genuine hobbyists, 30% vicarious onlookers/troll and 20% women hater/sadists.

I myself, am a provider and a vicarious onlooker as I like to partake in the conversations with the Eccie audience. Being a vicarious onlooker is harmless. I mean, I stated I am here in the wee hours of the morning because there is nothing on TV except infomercials and soft porn so I come here to interact with the Eccie audience. So to the lonely fellows who like to chat or interact, live vicariously thru others, no harm in that we are all curious- so keep on keeping on as Bob Dylen once said.

To the Sadists who come here to hurt women, get help! Try to figure out why you wish to hurt others. I'm not a sexist in anyway so I will acknowledge the fact that it goes both ways. So vice versa I'm sure there are females who fall into the scam-a-man or troubled on-the-lam category. Once they flake off/run off or don't provide said services they come on here and post an alert on the dude. My point is, if you have a reason to bash someone, fine, use your RIGHTS and speak up.

Don't come here if you are a sadist. Thank you
LovingKayla's Avatar
Wait. Wait. Wait.


I can edit pics? W T F memo asshole.....
continued edited pics posted today
http://dallas.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...rl-35/12674326
novacain's Avatar
KittyLamour's Avatar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ur0g-R7ZODY Originally Posted by novacain
Nova, I totally agree with you. The insanity should have stopped a long time ago. I wish I never posted that alert and none of this would have happened, I just thought it was important to let other providers know a thief. Look at what all it got me. Ridiculous. I am sorry to say, if there's a next time if I can't post the alert anonymously I will not post. So many hobbyists I talk to lately say that they only read reviews they choose not to get involved because of the drama. Meaning they no longer post. That's sad because I felt safe from feeling like I belonged in the community. I no longer feel this way. This whole experience has made me absolutely sick. Not to mention crippled me financially. It's wrong. When reviews are obviously intended to hurt someone rather than objectively enlighten the community....should they be allowed to remain in reviews. I personally don't think so. It's like a constant wound every time I see "My Reviews" under my verified provider status. I was proud to be a part of the ECCIE community. Now I am constantly ashamed through no fault of my own doing.
KittyLamour's Avatar
The absolute only thing edited on those pictures is color vibrancy and they have a frame added to them. What is wrong with making dull pictures taken with a web cam more vibrant and easier to see by my intended audience. I am including before editing and after editing attachments to once again prove my photos are accurate representations of myself.
continued edited pics posted today
http://dallas.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...rl-35/12674326 Originally Posted by OHmyGOD
Attached Images File Type: jpg Snapshot_20110307_89.jpg (116.8 KB, 215 views) File Type: jpg Snapshot_20110307_89-1.jpg (104.2 KB, 209 views) File Type: jpg Snapshot_20110310_80.jpg (117.0 KB, 210 views) File Type: jpg Snapshot_20110310_80-1.jpg (74.5 KB, 213 views) File Type: jpg Snapshot_20110310_310-2.jpg (74.3 KB, 214 views) File Type: jpg Snapshot_20110310_310-1.jpg (79.4 KB, 214 views) File Type: jpg Snapshot_20110307_100.jpg (123.7 KB, 214 views) File Type: jpg Snapshot_20110307_100-1.jpg (128.8 KB, 215 views)
Iaintliein's Avatar
Virtually all digital photos need some post processing (what is being called editing in this thread); color, noise, contrast etc. By the time film was on the wane this sort of stuff was accomplished automatically even at corner film developers. Pro labs also did dodging and burning that you can now do at home.

As an amatuer (but very avid) user of photoshop, my opinion is these images were poorly post processed (a better term than "edited"), probably because they were very low resolution to start with as evidenced by the amount of noise and compression artifacts in the originals. Noise and the software algorithms to get rid of it, both take away detail similar to blurring.

People here complain often about "professional" photos, but, in my opinion, low resolution, grainy, poorly lit, over compressed point ant shoots can be just as misleading. There are some excellent quality and reasonably priced professional photographers here at eccie, and I've never, ever read someone say Raven or the other pro's here produced anything but accurate photos.

Shoot at the highest resolution you can, do your post processing (except sharpening), decrease the image size for posting, then sharpen.

I don't think the lady's intention was to mislead with the photos unless they are way out of date, I think they were technically poor to start with.
shooter6.5's Avatar
in the above post.

You put up a new add today. Give it hell and knock em dead-and remember, no matter who you are or what you do-ya will not please everyone.

You need to write the staff and have this thread closed. Get away from it and move on.
This thread is still going, seriously?
this has gone on long enough...