whats stupid is constantly repeating an acronym of which no one knows the meaning Originally Posted by nevergaveitathoughtWhat’s stupider is the WDNDs inability to look in the mirror and ask themselves why they hate everyone in their country. Heroes, villains, examples, everybody but Trump and his crime family.
What’s stupider is the WDNDs inability to look in the mirror and ask themselves why they hate everyone in their country. Heroes, villains, examples, everybody but Trump and his crime family.its dumber than hell to change an acronym when no one even knew the meaning of the original acronym
That’s stupiders, but exactly what the WSNDs do. Originally Posted by HoeHummer
Well.. logic dictates that if the protesters were violating curfew.. so was Rittenhouse. Can't have one without the other. Originally Posted by Grace PrestonYeah but Rioters are criminals they don't care about the Law. Rittenhouse was there originally to help a friend secure his business from the Mayhem. At the end of the day that kid will walk.
He's guilty. Cut his fuckin' head off! And the police who let him walk by and drive home. All of them.Nothing Peaceful about it. Violence causes problems and violence solves it, Rittenhouse proved that. As the Police are being restricted by Liberal idiots that run cities, the Patriotic Americans will line the streets with laundry for them. Expect it.
He murders a peaceful protester and goes home. Systemic law enforcement racism. Case in point.
Suck it.
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
i would rather rescue these people from the dark side
but they have given themselves over to a hardened heart and a willfully closed mind
they have been taught wrongly but well
how any sane individual can not see self defense in rittenhouse's actions is inexplicable and can only be explained by some harbored corrupt self interest Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
There IS self defense in his actions--I'm on the way out to a lease but ..will think about and reply as time allows
But from a legal perspective, he has 3 big issues.
1. In Wisconsin, him carrying a rifle that he wasn't legal to carry under law, can negate self defense.
2. As is so often said about other law breakers "Well.. if he hadn't broken the law, he wouldn't have had any problems". He chose to be there.
3. With the exception of the guy who got shot in the arm-- who had a gun? The original claim was that the first guy threw a molotov cocktail at him.. but that was proven to be a..... plastic bag. The second guy did come at him with a skateboard-- but that was AFTER he killed the first guy. With 1 and 2 above-- it does make a solid "self defense" claim much more difficult.
I still think he's ultimately walk on murder charges-- though he's likely to get some lesser charges before its all said and done (mostly linked to the possession of a firearm-- and perhaps discharge of that firearm). The only wildcard is that there are some claims that he had made social media posts about going to kill some protesters. If that can be proven... we're at another level. Originally Posted by Grace Preston
9500 - is blinded by racist, marxist leftist narrative, rhetoric, and LSM Lies.Oh give 95 a break he only uses one brain cell at a time, lol.
I hope he does find a place with no Police force for protection from OBLM/ antifa mobs and terrorists.
Perhaps 9500 might learn to see reality a it is, rather than as a XiNN tv broadcast. Originally Posted by oeb11