Since you continue to make such a big deal out of this and you have now outed the details and when you were so clearly in violation, I dug it out of the archives too. Upon the offer to extend your 2 weeks of PA over to his handle, those five words were "Don't do me any favors". So I didn't.
Originally Posted by Chica Chaser
Sorry, no. You offered and i responded with this. In full:
On Monday, September 1, 2014 3:45 PM, Doove wrote:
"Fine. I'll make a mental note of the dogged rigidness in your insistence on adherence to the strictest of strict interpretations of the rules. As well as your justification of a ban irrespective of the level of the transgression.
I guess if i wanna get away with breaking the rules, i need to go around accusing providers of using illicit drugs. Or having an STD. Instead of........causing potential harm to absolutely nobody.
Again, noted."
Nowhere in there did i say "don't do me no favors".
Yet, at that point you rescinded the offer. You're lying, plain and simple.
Only after the offer was rescinded did i say this:
"Ain't looking for any favors. I'm looking for you to do what you should have done; issue me some points and be done with it."
So not only are you lying about what i said and when, you're taking what i did say out of context.
When you need to do that, i think it's pretty clear you've lost the argument. In spite of what all your butt buddies want to claim.
Go ahead, obfuscate all you want, but we both know what was said;
We do now.
I can read as well as you can.
Apparently not.
Thats the best part of it all, PA that he bought under a multiple handle and got busted for it
Yeah, as if that's the entire story. Multiple handle blah blah blah.
I noticed you never responded to my hypothetical when i offered you the chance under your Camouflage handle. Tell me the person in my
hypothetical should be banned. Go ahead.
