Grew up in the UK ?They keep picking fights and asking us to bail them out. Go figure.
They may explain a lot of what is eating at your ass.
One side of my ancestry had little education, yet in 1886 he was smart enough to flee that country. Originally Posted by rioseco
They keep picking fights and asking us to bail them out. Go figure.I'm sure they would be curious to hear this, seeing as how they fought the good fight for two years while we couldn't be bothered to join the fight at all.
No wonder the English girls like American dick. Originally Posted by LexusLover
I'm sure they would be curious to hear this, seeing as how they fought the good fight for two years while we couldn't be bothered to join the fight at all. Originally Posted by UnderConstructionYea, what was his name .... oh, yea .... "NEVER" Chamberlain ....
______LL is an Idiot______You didn't do to well on the fill-in-the-blank tests in high school, did you?
Ask and ye shall receive! (That was easy enough) Originally Posted by bigtex
That's obviously auto correct you fucking idiot. You take issue with that because you think it makes your ignorant argument more credible. It doesn't, but that's fine with me. Auto correct would not do what you claim Hillary and there was no argument attached to that observation.Firstly, Obama didn't turn cops into villains. Cops were villains way before Obama came along. Zimmerman was told to quit following Martin, but he kept going because like you, he thought he knew better. And he ruined his life and is I'm sure wishing now that he had taken that operator's advice. They did edit the call and that was wrong. The sad thing is, they didn't need to. He was a racist all on his own without any help. It's also sad how cut and dry you think everything in Ferguson was. I understand it from a psychological point of view; it's uncomfortable, you need to square it away in your mind as being someone's fault, so of course it's the bad black man's fault. He deserved to die, in your mind. He could have tasered him. But he wasn't wearing a taser. Why? Because he said they weren't comfortable. I bet he wishes he could make that decision over again...
Im talking about idiots like you, who will argue all day and any which way, as long as it supports their party's political agenda. You are a classic example of a brainwashed idiot. I'm a conservative, I don't have a party in either the democrats or republicans. What is "my party's" political agenda?
Again you show how ignorant you really are. Define "criminal act"? do you think possession of marijuana is a good enough reason for some one to lose their life over? You are a huge fucking DOLT, if you think that there is no difference between a criminal act and murder. Most gun related deaths DO happen over petty squabbles like drug deals gone bad, drunken arguments. Yes, they are also criminal acts but not every crime is punishable by death. You've been watching too much Faux news. A drug deal gone bad is not exactly a squabble. It is a crime and depending on the amount it either a felony or misdemeanor. I really have no idea where you come with the death punishment thing. Do you?
Firstly, that's obviously not true. Secondly, if you think you're getting under my skin by shitting on democrats then you are, once again, guilty of being ignorant (story of your life, isn't it?). I am not a democrat and don't identify myself with one party over another. I vote for ideas. I think both parties are evil. But would I want to be slapped by Satan's right hand (republicans) over his left hand (democrats)? Hell fucking no. Everyone knows Satan wipes with his right.
In my case having a lying, cheating and spying government that wants to give blacks, womens, gays and other minorities their basic fucking rights is better than a lying, cheating and spying government that doesn't. That is pretty much the only reason I vote democrat. You're a liberal plain and simple. Are you a socialist? That remains to be seen. Now you advance a religious argument???? Wow! Satan? Do you even know where the term's right wing and left wing come from? As for those basic fucking rights, they have them and have for some time. We have people who want more and that is the problem. The democrats are willing to sell their souls (ooooo, a religious reference) for the votes.
Well look at that! JD idiot thinks he knows better than someone who's actually lived there! The arming of police has been one of the biggest debate issues in UK for the past few decades. So don't trivialize it if you don't know jackshit about it. Apparently, while we were busy killing ourselves over dems vs repubtards, they were busy focusing on the real issues. Police disarmament was in direct response to public fear of the police being too powerful and becoming a "Marshall" Law instrument. It stems from back in the old days, when the imperial army used to maintain order with firearms, in very similar fashion to what our cops do now in the good old USA. Only Ireland police carry firearms. In the rest of the UK, only special firearms units carry weapons so they can also respond appropriately when needed to a terror threat. Yeah you can go to jail for 20 years for punching a cop but you also get to live for the remaining 40. Classic brainwashed republican. I bet you are one of those "white-trash" republicans that lives in a trailer but doesn't want the government to raise taxes on the rich.
Obviously, the only ones who need education here are you and LLIdiot. No, I only spent about four or five months in England some years ago. I'm not a limey, my mother's family got out in 1775. Of course, you missed the salient point; you shoot a cop in this country and you claim racism and get off with a few years. You punch a cop in England and you go down hard. Huge difference that maybe you're not so sure of. Say something British for us. My home is a three bedroom house by the way with a full basement and I don't want the government to raise taxes on anyone because they just waste the money.[/QUOTE]
Wonder what we were talking about? You can go have some bangers and mash or maybe some spotted dick.
Anyway, it would appear that Obama's chickens have come home to roost. Three times he went up against the police in this country based solely on race (Gates, Zimmerman, and Brown). He turned the cops into the villians and of course some idiot will think that shooting a villian is okay. Holder followed suit along with their toady the governor of Missouri. The officer was guilty from the beginning despite the evidence. Eventually even the Justice Department had to admit that the evidence was not there but they just couldn't let it go. They had to come up with a cobbled together report that accused the police department (once again) of being the bad guys. No wonder someone got shot and now the White House is embarassed. Where did this start? The media again. They changed the 911 call to accuse George Zimmerman of racism. The have an agenda and the truth (or even fairness) be damned.
One final note; if you are truly English then you know about the importance of Marshal in English history. Only one "L" in that name. Originally Posted by shanm
When was it proved that Zimmerman didn't stop following Martin as advised, you "#Grubered" Odumbo Minion?
Firstly, Obama didn't turn cops into villains. Cops were villains way before Obama came along. Zimmerman was told to quit following Martin, but he kept going because like you, he thought he knew better. And he ruined his life and is I'm sure wishing now that he had taken that operator's advice. They did edit the call and that was wrong. The sad thing is, they didn't need to. He was a racist all on his own without any help. It's also sad how cut and dry you think everything in Ferguson was. I understand it from a psychological point of view; it's uncomfortable, you need to square it away in your mind as being someone's fault, so of course it's the bad black man's fault. He deserved to die, in your mind. He could have tasered him. But he wasn't wearing a taser. Why? Because he said they weren't comfortable. I bet he wishes he could make that decision over again...
http://www.dailydot.com/politics/darren-wilson-taser/
As for your family getting out, I guess they waited to see which way the tide would turn before they made a decision... Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
"[A]fter calling the police and reporting what he believed was Martin's suspicious behavior, the 911 dispatcher told Zimmerman he didn't need to continue to follow Martin. It's worth noting that the dispatcher had no legal authority to tell Zimmerman what to do and even if Zimmerman continued following Martin, it wouldn't be a crime. Regardless, Zimmerman says he obeyed and began walking back to his truck to meet with a police officer when Martin confronted and then attacked him shortly afterwards. While it's impossible to prove one way or the other with the evidence available, Zimmerman's story is consistent with the facts presented at trial."
http://townhall.com/columnists/johnh...9838/page/full
When was it proved that Zimmerman didn't stop following Martin as advised, you "#Grubered" Odumbo Minion? Originally Posted by I B HankeringYou didn't highlight this part
You didn't highlight this partNotice how that "highlighted" phrase undercuts your lying claim, and not mine, you "#Grubered" Odumbo Minion. Meanwhile:
While it's impossible to prove one way or the other with the evidence available
The bottom line is that Zimmerman was a nosy motherfucker. He stuck it in where it didn't belong and ended up killing a kid that didn't need to die. He wasn't robbing someone, he wasn't doing anything but walking. As the following indicates, he had reason to be scared. He's walking to a friend's and he's being followed by this guy. I would wonder what the fuck was going on too.
"Since Martin was being followed by someone he didn't know, it would be perfectly understandable if he was alarmed by that and worried about his safety." Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
Zimmerman's story is consistent with the facts presented at trial.
