Comey Defends Decision Not To Recommend Indictment of Hillary

It comes down to this.

She asked for a secure email and was told she didn't need it. She was sent emails that were not marked classified and forwarded them. Later they were marked as classified. She did not break the law. I keep hearing how she should have been more careful, how about the fuckers that said she did not need a secure email because she did not have the clearance. Who sent her the fucking emails? Apparently whom ever sent them had the credentials to have them but they sent them to an unsecured email. WTF? I got it, they did not break the law because they were not marked classified at the time is that it? GOP logic. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

If the above is correct, she's not qualified to be POTUS. Affirmative Action is an inappropriate "program" to be implemented with the office of the POTUS.

This country has had that for almost 8 years now. Hasn't worked out.

You're lib-retarded clown. Powell used secure State Department computers to receive and transmit classified information, and Rice didn't use email at all. And you are lying Kool Aid sotted minion when you suggest that Rice and Powell set up an insecure server to conduct 100% of their State Department business: they didn't.

Odumbo and others certainly would have been implicated in any investigation. They knew and didn't report hildebeest's violations of the law, and knowing and not doing anything about it is also a violation of the law. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Don"t feel the need to respond to a 12 year old that call people names when they know they are wrong. Rice didnt use email give me a fucking break. You guys came up with some stupid shit to pin on Hillary and lost. man up!

" The State Department found that emails handled on private email accounts associated with Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice contain "information classified at the Secret or Confidential levels.'" Former Secretary Powell responded that those identified emails were not marked "'Confidential at the time and they were sent as unclassified,'" seemingly underscoring Secretary Clinton's defense that "the State Department is classifying documents too aggressively"

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/03...f-state/209044

...... seemingly underscoring Secretary Clinton's defense that "the State Department is classifying documents too aggressively"............ Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Now, Junior, go read the regs ..... and Executive Order by Obaminable!!!!

..... on who is RESPONSIBLE for DOS document classification!

Then once you're educated on that point ..... ponder this one ......


... Why would you want to give her MORE AUTHORITY over MORE AGENCIES when she can't even handle ONE AGENCY and make sure it doesn't screw up???

Because you want to vote for the First Female President!!!!!! ....

... even if she is an incompetent, brain damaged, screw up!!!!!!

Now, Junior, go read the regs ..... and Executive Order by Obaminable!!!!

..... on who is RESPONSIBLE for DOS document classification!

Then once you're educated on that point ..... ponder this one ......


... Why would you want to give her MORE AUTHORITY over MORE AGENCIES when she can't even handle ONE AGENCY and make sure it doesn't screw up???

Because you want to vote for the First Female President!!!!!! ....

... even if she is an incompetent, brain damaged, screw up!!!!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Your argument makes no sense. If they were not marked classified when she got them how the hell would she know if they would be later.
Besides the made up bullshit the Conservatives have tried to pin on her she has done an outstanding job. Trump on the other hand is a walking fuck up. How many law suits has he lost in just the past few months? He has been involved in how many? Trump has no ability to run anything, let alone a country. Explain how a classified email was sent her unsecured email and by whom? I don't see anyone else being named in the suit. It takes more than person to send and receive an email. I never said I was voting for her by the way.

Don"t feel the need to respond to a 12 year old that call people names when they know they are wrong. Rice didnt use email give me a fucking break. You guys came up with some stupid shit to pin on Hillary and lost. man up!

" The State Department found that emails handled on private email accounts associated with Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice contain "information classified at the Secret or Confidential levels.'" Former Secretary Powell responded that those identified emails were not marked "'Confidential at the time and they were sent as unclassified,'" seemingly underscoring Secretary Clinton's defense that "the State Department is classifying documents too aggressively"

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/03...f-state/209044 Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You'd be the lib-retard with a twelve year old's mentality trying to defend an indefensible, lying bitch.

Email Scandal Spin: No, Hillary, Powell and Rice Didn't 'Do It Too'


(2) Hildebeest blames this controversy on the issue of retroactive classification, which Powell complains about, too. This gripe may apply to some of Hillary's emails, and to both of Powell's, but Hillary is being deeply disingenuous here. The nonpartisan IC Inspector General has determined that a number of her classified emails were absolutely classified at the time they originated, including top secret and beyond-top-secret intelligence. There was nothing "retroactive" about these classifications. News organizations have also confirmed that scores of her emails were, in fact, classified at the time. It was her duty to identify and protect highly sensitive information, regardless of markings, a responsibility she acknowledged and swore to uphold upon assuming office:

(3) "See? Condi and Colin did it, too!" relies on a thoroughly bogus equivalency. Above all else, neither Rice nor Powell set up and used a recklessly unsecure private emails server on which they conducted all of their official business, against "clear cut rules" implemented in 2005. (A former CIA director and Secretary of Defense have each stated that her vulnerable server was likely penetrated by foreign powers like the Russians and Chinese). This review identified ten -- total -- emails that have now been assigned retroactive, low-level classification levels. Only two of them went to then-Secretary of State Powell, with the others going to Rice's aides, and both of those are now classified at the lowest level ("confidential"). As mentioned above, hildebeest's server contained 1,600 classified emails and counting, including the most sensitive level of intelligence in existence (SAP, beyond-top-secret). There is no comparison between the conduct of hildebeest and that of her immediate predecessors. Beyond her exclusive use of an improper and unsecure server, hildebeest was personally and specifically warned about the vulnerability of her email scheme in 2011, when a State Department security expert sounded the alarm over foreign hackers seeking to infiltrate US secrets by targeting high-ranking officials' private emails. Hildebeest carried on with her arrangement anyway.

Hildebeest mishandled hundreds upon hundreds of classified emails, which held state secrets at the highest classification levels....

Unlike Powell and Rice, hildebeest exhibited ongoing gross negligence by exposing reams of sensitive and classified intelligence to foreign governments. Hildebeest ignored her sworn duty to safeguard secrets, "marked and unmarked," and declined to alter her behavior after she was admonished of an explicit vulnerability pertaining to personal email use. And unlike Powell and Rice, hildebeest has consistently lied about this scandal.

(Townhall)

Powell said he never kept the emails in his possession when he left the State Department. Unlike hildebeest, Powell's emails remained in government computer servers.

An aide to Rice, who now teaches at Stanford University, said that Rice herself never used email -- not even a personal email account -- during her tenure.

(CNN)

You'd be the lib-retard with a twelve year old's mentality trying to defend an indefensible, lying bitch. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Hey captain name caller, Rice had her aides do it for her. same fucking thing, as for Powell he did it admits he did it and said find them yourself. Why don't you tell us exactly what law she broke.

Hey captain name caller, Rice had her aides do it for her. same fucking thing, as for Powell he did it admits he did it and said find them yourself. Why don't you tell us exactly what law she broke. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Ask Comey, shit-for-brains. Comey said if anybody else did what hildebeest did it would as a minimum lead to administrative actions including dismissal and could lead to prosecution for violations of federal laws and regulations.

Ask Comey.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Here is what Comey said in the link in post # 1, explaining why he did not recommend an indictment. There was no intent.

In trying to explain his decision to lawmakers, Comey told a House panel that two things matter in such a criminal probe, “What did the person do ... and when they did it — did they know they were doing something that was unlawful?”
“When I look at the facts we gathered here ... I see evidence of great carelessness, but I do not see evidence sufficient to establish that Secretary Clinton or those with whom she was corresponding both talked about classified information on email and knew when they did it that they were doing something that was against the law,” he said earlier this month. “No reasonable prosecutor would bring this case.”
He has called Clinton and her aides “extremely careless” for their handling of classified information, and he has acknowledged that U.S. law makes it a crime to exhibit “gross negligence” in dealing with such sensitive material. But testifying before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Comey said the Justice Department has used the law only once in the statute’s 99-year existence — in a case involving espionage.

Here is what Comey said in the link in post # 1, explaining why he did not recommend an indictment. There was no intent.

In trying to explain his decision to lawmakers, Comey told a House panel that two things matter in such a criminal probe, “What did the person do ... and when they did it — did they know they were doing something that was unlawful?”
“When I look at the facts we gathered here ... I see evidence of great carelessness, but I do not see evidence sufficient to establish that Secretary Clinton or those with whom she was corresponding both talked about classified information on email and knew when they did it that they were doing something that was against the law,” he said earlier this month. “No reasonable prosecutor would bring this case.”
He has called Clinton and her aides “extremely careless” for their handling of classified information, and he has acknowledged that U.S. law makes it a crime to exhibit “gross negligence” in dealing with such sensitive material. But testifying before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Comey said the Justice Department has used the law only once in the statute’s 99-year existence — in a case involving espionage. Originally Posted by flghtr65

Here's what Comey said, flighty:

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.

(FBI)

Oh, IBOla...

WAAAHHHH. WAAAAHHHHH. WAAAHHHH.

Trump says he's a winner?

Horse shit.

Hillary gets pounded day in and day out and emerges victorious. Every time.

Your arguments with yet another newcomer reveal how universally ridiculed you are.

Go back to the barn!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!

Oh, IBOla...

WAAAHHHH. WAAAAHHHHH. WAAAHHHH.

Trump says he's a winner?

Horse shit.

Hillary gets pounded day in and day out and emerges victorious. Every time.

Your arguments with yet another newcomer reveal how universally ridiculed you are.

Go back to the barn!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

So, that's why 67% of the population believe hildebeest is a bigger liar and more dishonest than Trump, isn't that correct, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM?

Ask Comey, shit-for-brains. Comey said if anybody else did what hildebeest did it would as a minimum lead to administrative actions including dismissal and could lead to prosecution for violations of federal laws and regulations.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Here's what Comey said, flighty: Originally Posted by I B Hankering

So, that's why 67% of the population believe hildebeest is a bigger liar and more dishonest than Trump, isn't that correct, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Hey Dumbass nobody thinks that except for a few dildos that are still clinging onto the dream that Trump could win. It is a fact that he is the biggest liar ever to run for President. I already posted this link but you ignored it.
https://infogr.am/05d33198-eeb3-4636-a8b5-fc4b3898f7f5

Hey Dumbass nobody thinks that except for a few dildos that are still clinging onto the dream that Trump could win. It is a fact that he is the biggest liar ever to run for President. I already posted this link but you ignored it.
https://infogr.am/05d33198-eeb3-4636-a8b5-fc4b3898f7f5 Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You'd be the dumbass, because, as cited in the CBS poll, 2 out of 3 Americans believe hildebeest is the bigger liar, dumb-ass. Your dumb-ass would be that "#Grubered" one out of three that is stupidly oblivious to facts, dumb-ass.

You'd be the dumbass, because, as cited in the CBS poll, 2 out of 3 Americans believe hildebeest is the bigger liar, dumb-ass. Your dumb-ass would be that "#Grubered" one out of three that is stupidly oblivious to facts, dumb-ass. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I don't give a shit what poll you found to ride in on, the fact is he is a bigger liar than she. Hey I just realized he has said he is better at everything than anyone else. in this case he is right. You do realize the poll was at the RNC convention.
'In a CBS News poll, taken after last weeks Republican convention"

Here are the latest Polls by the way.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...nton-5491.html

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...llege_map.html

Texas could even swing to Clinton this election. It moved three points closer under Obama. This could be the election that tips the scales.

I don't give a shit what poll you found to ride in on, the fact is he is a bigger liar than she. Hey I just realized he has said he is better at everything than anyone else. in this case he is right. You do realize the poll was at the RNC convention.
'In a CBS News poll, taken after last weeks Republican convention"

Here are the latest Polls by the way.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...nton-5491.html

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...llege_map.html

Texas could even swing to Clinton this election. It moved three points closer under Obama. This could be the election that tips the scales. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

The CBS poll still showed that a greater number of Americans, 2 out of 3, believe hildebeest is a liar, and the more she lies, the more Americans she'll alienate, dumb-ass, and Texas ain't going for hildebeest, dumb-ass.