First of all, I didn't throw the word around, I was just recapping your ridiculous statement, Furthermore it's not even important that I define it in my post. Your only goal is to make a big deal about nothing, and again you have no point.you stated ..
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
I threw the word Socialism around. I only used it twice in my original post. Actually I used it in two different context, Socialist and Socialism. Don't try and interpret my words to fit your ridiculous point. In fact you don't have a point. .His point, and I agree with it, is that you don't understand the traditional meaning of the word socialist.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
His point, and I agree with it, is that you don't understand the traditional meaning of the word socialist.You vented your frustration out on my post. I guess that's fine since that is what is done in this forum. Actually I understand Socialism quite well as a matter of fact. There is nothing in my original post that would indicate that I don't have an understanding. Because all I stated is that Hillary Clinton's political Ideology is based on Socialism. This is known because she admits to that fact. Contrary to how my post became misinterpreted, I actually wasn't putting her down, but commending her for being straight foreword about her political views.
It's become a catch-phrase, the new substitute for the word "communist" now that that word no longer has the boogie-man connotations it once had and because young people don't have any reason to be afraid of it anymore.
Another word that gets thrown around here a lot is "tyranny" but, like "socialism", it's pretty clear that the folks who use the term have no clue what it really means.
The drama queens like it because they think it lends credence to their whiney-ass complaining about those who disagree with them politically. It's a tea party catch phrase that the tea party nitwits like to use because they think it somehow ties them in to the people they imagine to be their revolutionary forebears, the founding fathers. Which is absurd but, that's the way people like the Professor think. Whirly'tard too.....that's why has a signature line that says "Yearning to breathe free....." or whatever it is.....I do remember he had "breathe" spelled "breath" for a long time until I corrected him on it and he changed it late one night when he thought nobody would notice. Point being, Whirly'tard and the Professor's and the rest of the whackadoos' sense of self-importance is inflated when they get to use words like these....even though the words have utterly no connection to reality to life as we know it.
Obama isn't a socialist. We don't live under a tyrannical government. And we are as free a nation as has ever existed in the history of mankind. Whirly floats around on his boat (or at least leads you to believe he does) and then wants everybody to believe he exists under the yoke of tyranny and "yearns to breathe free......"
What a fucking tool.
No offense to the OP, most of this ain't directed at you.
Words mean things. Socialism has a definition. Tyranny has a definition. A lot of posters on here don't appear to understand that. Originally Posted by timpage
Because all I stated is that Hillary Clinton's political Ideology is based on Socialism. This is known because she admits to that fact. Contrary to how my post became misinterpreted, I actually wasn't putting her down, but commending her for being straight foreword about her political views.As usual, there are two sides to every story!
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
As usual, there are two sides to every story!Whatever, I think they dug in their heels to prove something that was never intended.
One side only contains comments they want you to hear.
The other side contains comments that were actually said!
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...no-red-menace/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...failing-grade/
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/marxist.asp
http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/gov...ton_quotes.htm Originally Posted by bigtex
You vented your frustration out on my post. I guess that's fine since that is what is done in this forum. Actually I understand Socialism quite well as a matter of fact. There is nothing in my original post that would indicate that I don't have an understanding. Because all I stated is that Hillary Clinton's political Ideology is based on Socialism. This is known because she admits to that fact. Contrary to how my post became misinterpreted, I actually wasn't putting her down, but commending her for being straight foreword about her political views.I'm not frustrated. And, however unwittingly, you prove my point.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Because all I stated is that Hillary Clinton's political Ideology is based on Socialism. This is known because she admits to that fact. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Whatever, I think they dug in their heels to prove something that was never intended.If you actually believed that Horse CACA that you have been spouting, you are one gullible MOFO.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
If you actually believed that Horse CACA that you have been spouting, you are one gullible MOFO.Whatever your objection is to my original post and however you want to interpret the words used you go right ahead, cause I really don't give a dam. Cause I don't need anyone's approval.
If so, you must be related to Trendy and/or the Idiot Twins (JD and IB). Originally Posted by bigtex
Whatever your objection is to my original post and however you want to interpret the words used you go right ahead, cause I really don't give a dam. Cause I don't need anyone's approval. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisinUnlike you, I am content to let the experts separate fact from fiction.
