Should MrHappy remain our moderator?

There.. Use it Originally Posted by bladtinzu

As I said.... they'll still morons.... so be it

Mr. Giz, I am curious. What was.the."sleazy way this was started" are you referring to? Whats your take?

Well I'm going to keep my opinion's to myself. I will say MrH is in a difficult position now. If he responds to question's, then he will be eaten alive by board members. If he puts in his resignation as MOD, then he somewhat admits to some of the allegiations being made against him. So I imagine he's awaiting word from Administration about his status now.

Mr. Giz, I am curious. What was.the."sleazy way this was started" are you referring to? Whats your take? Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

I wish I could tell you! Rules!
The coward knows who they are.

hmmm. I suspected when I asked that was going to be the answer. I understand.

hmmm. I suspected when I asked that was going to be the answer. I understand. Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

If anyone deserves blame it should be me.I started the moderator abuse thread in response to what was told to me by people I trusted. The idea was to get any who felt they had a legitimate complaint to come forward, and to air an issue in general knowledge and discussion in private. Any who feel that was sleazy, due to personal animosity or for the sake of some nefarious plot is entitled to their opinion.
The thread did not produce a witness. It did cause the surfacing of opinions and statements from a fair number of people who had knowledge of what was being talked about. Also open to conjecture. To date my thread has not been closed. Ihave not been censured or pointed, nor despite the obvious lack of corroboration has anyone come forward to tell me I was wrong.
Hindsight is always 20/20. The Monday morning quarterback will always call the plays better than those on the field the day before. At the time it seemed the right course. Some will think I pilloried an innocent, some will say I did the right thing. Some will call me sleazy. Many will just wish the whole thing hadnt started in the first place. I know I wish I had never felt it necessary.

Nothing against the rules there, and is in fact being discussed. Giz says he can't discuss it because it was against the rules, which leads me to believe that he is nodding to something else.

If anyone deserves blame it should be me.I started the moderator abuse thread in response to what was told to me by people I trusted. The idea was to get any who felt they had a legitimate complaint to come forward, and to air an issue in general knowledge and discussion in private. Any who feel that was sleazy, due to personal animosity or for the sake of some nefarious plot is entitled to their opinion.
The thread did not produce a witness. It did cause the surfacing of opinions and statements from a fair number of people who had knowledge of what was being talked about. Also open to conjecture. To date my thread has not been closed. Ihave not been censured or pointed, nor despite the obvious lack of corroboration has anyone come forward to tell me I was wrong.
Hindsight is always 20/20. The Monday morning quarterback will always call the plays better than those on the field the day before. At the time it seemed the right course. Some will think I pilloried an innocent, some will say I did the right thing. Some will call me sleazy. Many will just wish the whole thing hadnt started in the first place. I know I wish I had never felt it necessary. Originally Posted by Mr.Chan

Mr.Chan
With all due respect, I must disagree with you. It was not you that started this mess. You simply asked questions that needed to be asked.
I think the majority of members have a good idea and this poll reflects the same, where and how this sleazy mess truly started.

If anyone deserves blame it should be me.I started the moderator abuse thread in response to what was told to me by people I trusted. The idea was to get any who felt they had a legitimate complaint to come forward, and to air an issue in general knowledge and discussion in private. Any who feel that was sleazy, due to personal animosity or for the sake of some nefarious plot is entitled to their opinion.
The thread did not produce a witness. It did cause the surfacing of opinions and statements from a fair number of people who had knowledge of what was being talked about. Also open to conjecture. To date my thread has not been closed. Ihave not been censured or pointed, nor despite the obvious lack of corroboration has anyone come forward to tell me I was wrong.
Hindsight is always 20/20. The Monday morning quarterback will always call the plays better than those on the field the day before. At the time it seemed the right course. Some will think I pilloried an innocent, some will say I did the right thing. Some will call me sleazy. Many will just wish the whole thing hadnt started in the first place. I know I wish I had never felt it necessary. Originally Posted by Mr.Chan

You are not the sleazy party, Chan..... I only wish you knew more. . . .
This whole thing started with sleaze.... and hasn't improved since then!

. . . . I think the majority of members have a good idea. . . where and how this sleazy mess truly started. Originally Posted by megustalatina

I doubt that, quite seriously!

You are not the sleazy party, Chan..... I only wish you knew more. . . .
This whole thing started with sleaze.... and hasn't improved since then!

I doubt that, quite seriously! Originally Posted by MrGiz

I'm not doubting you Giz, but the "I only wish you knew more" statement sounds like righteous indignation. Please enlighten me or us, if you cannot or choose not to then pardon my skepticism of your knowledge on the subject. PM me if you would like.

To fan away doubt cast, blame the smoke on the wind.

I'm not doubting you Giz, but the "I only wish you knew more" statement sounds like righteous indignation. Please enlighten me or us, if you cannot or choose not to then pardon my skepticism of your knowledge on the subject. PM me if you would like. Originally Posted by jim1995

It's far from righteous. . . but this incredibly dysfunctional place has "so-called rules", which are the only "true" thing in place.... I am not going to fuck myself over such sleaze, as exists within this very thread! They know who they are!

Ya know what? I've been enlightened. . . perhaps, the "sleaze" word has scared the initial dog whistle blower from stepping up and confidently expressing their charges.

Please feel free. . . free. . . free to be so brave.... now, that you have a legion of ignorance behind you!
Please present your case!

Rules prevent telling all there is about how it began, but some of it is in plain sight under Coed Discussion. A challenge to the mod was issued just a few days before Christmas and that thread has become the most read thread in recent history.