Obama has been out of office since January 20, 2017. I am much more concerned on what Trump will do concerning Syria than argue about what Obama did or did not do in Syria... Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXLet's see... Bush was out of office for at least 6 years before Obama eased up on blaming his predecessor for everything bad that happened on his watch. Yet you want us to ignore how the Syrian mess originated and grew to its current catastrophic dimensions under Obama's spectacularly inept foreign policy stewardship?
Let's see... Bush was out of office for at least 6 years before Obama eased up on blaming his predecessor for everything bad that happened on his watch. Yet you want us to ignore how the Syrian mess originated and grew to its current catastrophic dimensions under Obama's spectacularly inept foreign policy stewardship?Actually Al queda/ISIS grew out of the 2003 Bush invasion! So Bush is not out of the woodshed just yet!
We're less than 100 days into a new administration, and you want us to zip it and not ask any questions that might make Dems uncomfortable, like - "how the fuck did the new POTUS inherit such a godawful mess?"
Can you say double standard? Originally Posted by lustylad
Actually Al queda/ISIS grew out of the 2003 Bush invasion! So Bush is not out of the woodshed just yet!
Hell we can trace much of it back to Carter and Reagan arming the rebels in Afghanistan.
Imho minding our own business would pay off in the long run. Nation building is a costly proposition Originally Posted by WTF
you can trace it back to about 607 A.D. Originally Posted by nevergaveitathoughtTell that Snowflaking, neoconic , liberal nation building , baby loving lustyladyboy.
And still, you haven't learned a thing. You're just a card-carrying member of the War Resisters League, who is too much of a fucking simpleton to acknowledge there are times in our history when military force is necessary and morally justified. The world is constantly changing, but your knee-jerk, simple-minded, unnuanced reaction never changes. Originally Posted by lustyladI have no problem with you gathering up all your money, arms and friends to go fight for Syrian babies. Just quit taking from my SS and Medicare to do so.
you can trace it back to about 607 A.D. Originally Posted by nevergaveitathoughtFagboy thinks any Muslim who ever had a jihadist thought is a progenitor of ISIS.
Which is wtf is gonna happen to Trump by taking out Assad.
Does anyone remember when Hillary was sending emails to her staff in late 2011 instructing them to make sure the media gave her proper "credit" for eliminating Qaddafi?
Less than a year later, she was in damage-control mode over Benghazi! Originally Posted by lustylad
Which is wtf is gonna happen to Trump by taking out Assad. Originally Posted by WTFNope. Pay attention. Here's what Secretary Rex Tillerson said yesterday:
No matter wtf happens over there, we will be blamed ... so just let my pal Assad keep gassing babies to death. Originally Posted by WTFFTFY, fagboy. We already put you down on the "moral depravity" side. Instead of being ashamed, you act obscenely proud of it. Why else would you keep bringing it up?
Nope. Pay attention. Here's what Secretary Rex Tillerson said yesterday:So we say he must go and the Syrian people will determine his fate...the Syrian rebels we arm!
"...we’ve seen what violent regime change looks like in Libya and -- and the kind of chaos that can be unleashed. And, indeed, the kind of misery that it enacts on its own people. I think what we’re hopeful is through this Syrian process... we can navigate a political outcome in which the Syrian people, in fact, will determine Bashar al-Assad’s fate."
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/full-tra...ation-april-9/
? Originally Posted by lustylad
Yep, those were the good ole days when Obama negoiated with the Russian (?) to rid Syria of ALL their weapons of mass destruction. Russia said Okay, and Syria said OK, and Obama said Oh boy and told us all that the crisis was over. . Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn[/QUOTE]
Apparently EVA doesn't keep up...Remember back in the day when you told us that the Rebel's were the one's with sarin gas?
http://www.kansascity.com/2013/09/05/4458751/russia-releases-100-page-report.html
Russia release 100 page report on rebels possession of chemical weapons.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/russians-rebels-used-sarin-in-aleppo/
Russians: Rebels used Sarin in Aleppo. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn