rude reviews...

I just gotta get in on this.
First, seems like a fair amount of ROS info is now public, what a surprise.

I thought the review itself was fine, informative, I can use it for decision making.
A couple of digs, but that's not a rare thing. Gen even gave some of Lnn's side of the story as well.

Lnn, you'll be fine.
I like the way you stand up for yourself.
But I have to agree with the ladies about price negotiation/haggling, it usually set's a bad tone. Let this be a lesson learned.
I don't think this wound up in the category of haggling or even negotiating, he asked, she accepted, simple as that. But I can see it setting a bad tone on Lnn's part, even though it may not have.
All who said one less than positive review won't hurt are right.
In fact, it's a lot like some old south Texas county judge once said - 'all publicity is good, some is just better than others'.

Originally Posted by txman123

Thank you txman. That's a pretty fair assessment and why i'm not sure why this got so blown out of proportion how it did. I don't mind Leslie expressing her thoughts on the situation from her view. She's trying to protect her reputation and brand. I'm not perfect. She's not perfect. Nobody on here is. Even though i don't agree with the premise behind this thread, I'm actually glad Leslie posted her rebuttal. It was pretty revealing about some things on here lol. And even as you said, this wasn't really a haggling situation, but it's interesting to observe some of the guys that accuse/criticize me for haggling, yet in other threads those same guys either excuse haggling or flat out admit they're hagglers and have numerous other posts complaining about provider rates. That's pretty funny lol.

This whole thread makes me want to see Leslieann 33% more than I did before.

This whole thread makes me want to see Leslieann 33% more than I did before.

Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

Lol what are you waiting for my man? Go do it. She's a 'cutie with a booty'

Leslie, one of the absolute standards on this board is, a provider loses when she rants about a review. Stop - don't start another rant about how unfair that is. The reason they lose is, they show their worst side. Every time, without fail.

Is it possible the guy is working an agenda? Yes. But MOST of the time, guys are simply reporting on their experience (you know, "Escort Client Community Information Exchange"?). When you carp about a date, it immediately paints you as a slacker bitch. But hey, if you're okay with that, why complain?

How much chemistry can someone get on a first time visit for 30 minutes? Originally Posted by pyramider

You're horny, she's receptive, that's about as much chemistry as it takes. Kind of like matches and gasoline.

You're horny, she's receptive, that's about as much chemistry as it takes. Kind of like matches and gasoline. Originally Posted by Poppa_Viagra

I agree.

The donation she receives that she also sets, should be enough chemistry for a provider to give a guy a good time. If a provider HAS to have chemistry to perform, then she is not going to be long in this business. Especially since she has to get to know them to have this spark, so she has to see him at least a couple of times to see if it kicks in. By the way guys, you still have to pay her the required donation rate so she can see if there is this chemistry so she maybe perform for you better another time, of which you also have to pay then as well!