The Art of Slow Sensual Lovemaking

I LOVE 2 hour sessions. They just give you enough time to explore each other in a non-rushed way - and at my age I need the 2 hour sessions to get 2 Os for myself. So not completely unselfish. Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged
Yes, I agree. Two Hour sessions are great, and I am considering having this as a minimum - still working on some new menu changes...we'll see!
pyramider's Avatar
My two minutes is slow love making. Foes slow love making include nap time?
My two minutes is slow love making. Foes slow love making include nap time? Originally Posted by pyramider
Nap time only when we're finished devouring eachother!
Eva, I like your attitude and approach to this thing of ours!
FU_CC's Avatar
  • FU_CC
  • 01-07-2014, 01:28 AM
Eva, I like your attitude and approach to this thing of ours! Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged

really,

btw ... how many days tax payer unite to steal from cjohnny54 dug, poison, microwave military weapon, etc....?
Eva, I like your attitude and approach to this thing of ours! Originally Posted by watchoutthegameisrigged

NTFunGuy's Avatar
I think the art of slow, passionate love making is extremely sexy and sensual, and can be a very powerful experience. Unfortunately I think this may be even more mythical than a unicorn. A lost art form per se. There has to be that mental connection that transcends just the physical attraction. This is something that is gained over time through mutual understanding and trust. I feel many providers would prefer not to take it to this level. Maybe they feel that it crosses some imaginary line that is too intimate or personal. It requires some level of personal, emotional investment.
MOCHAakaMOCHA's Avatar
1hr barely touches the surface imo of slow and sensual but it's a decent start ..... greatly prefer 90mins and longer (much longer) dates. I've gotten quite a few dinner and clock-free dates recently (and looking forward to a few more throughout the spring) and they're the imo the best.
Oh wow...this thread is back in circulation