![Thumbsup](images/smilies/modern/thumbsup.gif)
#### Salty
... And it seems to be the proper decision by the Judge.Most of those in the legal profession would disagree with you.
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
there are always rules. you follow them or you don't.
Jackass Smith has no authority. never did.
tell me ..what does this sound like? a "by the book" investigation of "Evil Lord Trump" by the "Virtuous DemonRat Party" or a sham political prosecution?
fyi the Democratic party will now be referred to as the VDP ...
Virtuous DemonRat Party
without any clear LEGAL mandate Smith is what he's always been .. a political hack and ...
wait for it ...
wait .........
a CRIMINAL for bringing an unauthorized prosecution
BAHHABAAHAAAAAAA
send his hackass butthole back to the Hague for prosecution for treason
BAHHHAAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
The Attorney General has the ability to appoint a special counsel to assist an existing ATTORNEY GENERAL. It cannot appoint one to REPLACE or ACT as one because all Attorney generals are nominated and approved by the Senate. Without that, they have no power VESTED in them.
I love it when Democrats step on a rake. Originally Posted by texassapper
But the Supreme Court WILL have to rule on it, so I guess Massie and Meese ARE smarter than all the democrats who forgot to read the Constitution.
It's clear that Garland the traitor did not have the AUTHORITY to appoint a private citizen to act as an Attorney General.
hee hee...Originally Posted by texassapper
... And it seems to be the proper decision by the Judge.
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again