You're softening a bit, Sean. I like that. Originally Posted by TinManWell, not to put too fine a point on it, but this is essentially what I've been saying all along.
For example:
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1058520031
You're softening a bit, Sean. I like that. Originally Posted by TinManWell, not to put too fine a point on it, but this is essentially what I've been saying all along.
HAY GUYZ IS THIS DUMPSTER FIRE STILL BURNING? Originally Posted by snarlProbably.. but I hear there are some great medical advances in antibiotics. So there's hope.
Seriously, tho, sean... any pretense of you simply having a casual interest in this thing was lost a couple posts ago. Now, it's just getting kind of crazy lol!It's past the obsession point a long time ago for the OP, get some help dude.
Attachment 585439 Originally Posted by Y0yoY0
looking more and more like I was correct about her framing his costume wearing ass.....if they hadn't decided that she was crazy....they'd charge her and put her in jail Originally Posted by Tony GambinoAnd where does it say that they determined she was crazy? And just because charges have not been filed at this time does not mean that they wont be filed at a later date.
vi is a predator not a victim, shes dangerous and almost sent this silly costume wearing suitor to a long prison sentence because he stopped having feelings for her because she was bare backing everyone that gave her some cash....... Originally Posted by Tony GambinoYou have no evidence whatsoever to base this idiotic claim.
In the realm of established facts;Sean you are 100% correct, thank you.
1) !VI! met the pimp before she began sex work
2) !VI! left the pimp not the other way around Originally Posted by sean rider
Probably has something to do with her posting videos of her fucking clients on pornhub. Originally Posted by TinManIt has already been well established that someone else posted those videos.
How many pimps start up a legitimate LLC with the girls they're allegedly pimping, with the girl (Vi) being the sole member and actively marketing the business? She apparently was the brains behind that operation, which is another reason to doubt her status as "victim" with no control over her affairs. Originally Posted by TinManIts !VI! not Vi, and the whole LLC thing is irrelevant and nothing but a complete misunderstanding.
My mistake. She was the managing member of the LLC, as well as its spokesperson. Doesn't sound like such a victim to me. Originally Posted by TinManAgain that is not relevant to the trial. !VI! is 110% completely innocent of all these ridiculous and silly accusations that you people are making.
I don't have a dog in these various side fights, but looking up Federal Court records is hardly stalking. 99+% of all court records in the US are public. There are strong compelling policy reasons for that. It's one of the few things -- along with the Seventh Amendment -- that keeps prosecutors in check and keeps them from abusing the incredible power our system vests them with. Originally Posted by TexTushHogyou are correct, public records keep our justice system mostly on the up and up.......