Will The Israeli CryBibi survive to serve another term?

let me rephrase that .. i'd PAY him to do it. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
LATE BREAKING NEWS:

Wacky The Wacko Kid would pay to go down on Chuckie Poo.

Not that it really matters but Wacky has my permission.

What goes on between two consenting adult males is none of my business.

Go for it, Wacky!!!!!!!!!
  • DSK
  • 03-16-2015, 10:28 PM
damn right! they had their chance for a Palestinian state and refused it in 1948 when the British were dis-mantling their empire. Why? because they didn't get Jerusalem. Sorry Palestinians but the one and only true claim to Jerusalem belongs to the Israelites.

let's see Asshole Rider disagree with that? he can't and he won't. otherwise he'd have to refuse the very existence of Israel. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
You are aware that Ishmael's pappy tried to sacrifice his ass up on that rock on the Temple Mount known as the Dome of the Rock, which is why the followers of Mohammed claim the place, too?
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
damn right! they had their chance for a Palestinian state and refused it in 1948 when the British were dis-mantling their empire. Why? because they didn't get Jerusalem. Sorry Palestinians but the one and only true claim to Jerusalem belongs to the Israelites.

let's see Asshole Rider disagree with that? he can't and he won't. otherwise he'd have to refuse the very existence of Israel. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Waco, you're a good guy, but this is just beer-battered bullshit. The Palestinians lived there 2000 years. The international community had no right to take it away from them.
Waco, you're a good guy, but this is just beer-battered bullshit. The Palestinians lived there 2000 years. The international community had no right to take it away from them. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
First, not a good guy. Second, we're agreeing way too much lately. Total horseshit on wakkko's part. Look at what he's saying; Palestine wasn't happy to have the UK's old scraps as they dismantled their empire and finally stepped into the current time period. Of course that's after they left death and turmoil and countries in disarray all across the globe, because of course, the sun never set on the British Empire. Greedy pricks. The US and UK played a huge role in giving that land to Israel and it's been trouble since day one. There hasn't been a moment's peace since 1948.
  • shanm
  • 03-16-2015, 11:22 PM
First, not a good guy. Second, we're agreeing way too much lately. Total horseshit on wakkko's part. Look at what he's saying; Palestine wasn't happy to have the UK's old scraps as they dismantled their empire and finally stepped into the current time period. Of course that's after they left death and turmoil and countries in disarray all across the globe, because of course, the sun never set on the British Empire. Greedy pricks. The US and UK played a huge role in giving that land to Israel and it's been trouble since day one. There hasn't been a moment's peace since 1948. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
Agreed. Seems like COIdiot has been talking way too much sense lately. Not like his usual self at all! They must have either taken him off the medication, or just put him on it.


Still the Manchurian candidate betrays his common sense sometimes by doing stuff like calling Wakkko KKKid "a good guy".
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Hmmm . . . And here I was wondering what was wrong with you guys.
  • shanm
  • 03-17-2015, 12:19 AM
Hmmm . . . And here I was wondering what was wrong with you guys. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
You're just too much fun to fuck with man. Plus you do say some paranoid shit sometimes.

I mean, it was you who called Wakkko KKKid a good guy. Was that a temporary moment of insanity or do you really believe that? Wakkko is by far the most perverse, racist, ignorant asshole on this thread, and that's including IB.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
You're just too much fun to fuck with man. Plus you do say some paranoid shit sometimes.

I mean, it was you who called Wakkko KKKid a good guy. Was that a temporary moment of insanity or do you really believe that? Wakkko is by far the most perverse, racist, ignorant asshole on this thread, and that's including IB. Originally Posted by shanm
Picky, picky, picky. I like Waco. I don't agree with him, but he's funny. He pisses off people I like seeing pissed off.
  • DSK
  • 03-17-2015, 08:36 AM
First, not a good guy. Second, we're agreeing way too much lately. Total horseshit on wakkko's part. Look at what he's saying; Palestine wasn't happy to have the UK's old scraps as they dismantled their empire and finally stepped into the current time period. Of course that's after they left death and turmoil and countries in disarray all across the globe, because of course, the sun never set on the British Empire. Greedy pricks. The US and UK played a huge role in giving that land to Israel and it's been trouble since day one. There hasn't been a moment's peace since 1948. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
You are correct. They had the right intentions, but without the buy in from the Palestinians, it has created monumental turmoil.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Picky, picky, picky. I like Waco. I don't agree with him, but he's funny. He pisses off people I like seeing pissed off. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
You LIKE seeing others pissed off?

does that have anything to do with the fact that you're often pissed on through your glory hole in the Salina bus station men's room?
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
So some of you want to talk about history (if you know any of it) instead of the current affair of a sitting US president spending taxpayer money and resources to affect the election of a parlimentary democracy. This runs against everything that Obama has talked about (hypocrite), it is against US interests, and it is likely to be illegal (though no one is going to charge Obama).
So some of you want to talk about history (if you know any of it) instead of the current affair of a sitting US president spending taxpayer money and resources to affect the election of a parlimentary democracy. This runs against everything that Obama has talked about (hypocrite), it is against US interests, and it is likely to be illegal (though no one is going to charge Obama). Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Start your own thread on that topic. This thread is about whether Bibi will retain the Israeli Prime Minister position.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
And your tax dollars are being spent by Obama operatives trying to defeat Netanyahu. Obama claimed that he didn't want to imbalance the election and then he has a campaign team on the ground. Are you all right with the US government fixing elections?

I also have to say that I'm surprised that Tampon knew about the parlimentary form of government. He's right (one time out of many), the Knesset is elected by direct voting and they then vote for their new (or old) leader. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Which of my tax dollars are being spent on the Israeli campaign, JDIdiot?

I don't seem to recall you saying how much of my money was being directly spent on the campaign . Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
I'm still waiting for an answer to that question, JDIdiot...

Tick fucking tock!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
BREAKING NEWS:

Bibi's going to have to pull some real shenanigans if the election ends up in a tie... Right now, NYT reports it's too close to call.



http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/18/wo...rzog.html?_r=0
Latest news states he is tweeting a win, or is that bleating a win.